Cited by 27Respiratory Support and MechanismsChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) ResearchObstructive Sleep Apnea Research

Early failure of noninvasive ventilation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with acute hypercapnic respiratory failure

Ko, Byuk Sung, Ahn, Shin, Lim, Kyung Soo, Kim, Won Young, Lee, Yoon-Seon, Lee, Jae Ho·2015·Internal and Emergency Medicine

Abstract

Noninvasive ventilation (NIV) in the management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients with acute hypercapnic respiratory failure is considered a first-line therapy. However, patients who fail NIV and then require invasive mechanical ventilation have been found to have higher mortality than patients initially treated with invasive mechanical ventilation. We tried to find parameters associated with early NIV failure (need for intubation or death <24 h of starting NIV) in patients presenting to the ED with acute exacerbation of COPD. A retrospective analysis was conducted of the medical records of 218 patients with acute exacerbation of COPD visiting Asan Medical Center and managed with NIV during their stay in the ED from January 2007 to December 2013. NIV was successful in 200 (91.7%) and 18 (8.3%) had early NIV failure. Of the variables obtained before NIV treatment, heart rate (≥120/min: OR 2.5, 95% CI 1.2-7.0) and pH (7.25-7.29: OR 2.1, 95% CI 1.0-8.8; <7.25: OR 11.7, 95% CI 3.5-38.6) were significant factors associated with early NIV failure. Of the variables obtained after 1 h of NIV treatment, heart rate (≥120/min: OR 7.5, 95% CI 2.3-24.3) and pH (7.25-7.29: OR 4.7, 95% CI 1.5-15.1; <7.25: OR 20.9, 95% CI 5.4-61.2) were still significant. The presence of tachycardia and severe acidosis before NIV treatment and persistence of tachycardia and severe acidosis after 1 h of NIV treatment were associated with early NIV failure.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11739-015-1293-6

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ko, B. S., Ahn, S., Lim, K. S., Kim, W. Y., Lee, Y.-S., & Lee, J. H.
Affiliations
Asan Medical Center (KR)
Corresponding author
Ahn, Shin
Venue
Internal and Emergency Medicine
Published
2015-09-04
Volume
10
Issue
7
Pages
855-860
ISSN
  • 1828-0447 (ISSN-L)
  • 1970-9366
OpenAlex
W1234751227
Cited by
27
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1
FWCI
2.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Internal and Emergency Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research
Keywords
non-invasive ventilation, NIV failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, COPD exacerbations, hypercapnic respiratory failure, tachycardia, acidosis, risk factors, emergency department, invasive mechanical ventilation
MeSH terms
Aged, Blood Gas Analysis, Female, Humans, Hypercapnia, Intensive Care Units, Male, Middle Aged, Respiration, Artificial, Respiratory Insufficiency, Retrospective Studies, Multivariate Analysis, Logistic Models, Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive, Noninvasive Ventilation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review