The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Hydrophobicity, solubility, and emulsifying properties of soy protein peptides prepared by papain modification and ultrafiltration
Abstract
Peptide size control is important for obtaining desirable functional properties so that these peptides can be better utilized. Proteolytic enzymatic modification of soy protein isolates (SPI), followed by ultrafiltration, is an effective way to fractionate these proteins into peptides with controlled molecular size. SPI was predenatured by mild alkali at pH 10 and heated at 50°C for 1 h prior to partial hydrolysis by papain at pH 7.0 and 38°C for 10, 30, and 60 min (PMSPI10, PMSPI30, and PMSPI60). The hydrolysate PMSPI60 was further fractionated by ultrafiltration with a stirred cell and disc membranes (100‐, 50‐, and 20‐kDa molecular weight cut‐off) into one retentate (R100) and three permeates (P100, P50, and P20). Molecular weight distribution, surface hydrophobicity (S0), protein solubility (PS), emulsifying activity index (EAI), and emulsion stability index (ESI) of the control SPI (without added papain), hydrolysates, and ultrafiltrates were investigated. Significant increases (P<0.001) in S0, PS, EAI, and ESI were observed in the hydrolysates. Peptides in the permeates had higher PS and EAI but lower S0 than the peptides in the retentate and hydrolysate. Soy protein peptides that were prepared from SPI by papain modification and ultrafiltration had lower molecular weight, higher solubility, and higher emulsifying properties. They could find use in products that require these properties, especially in the cosmetic and health food industries.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Nakai, S. (1983) · Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jf00118a001 · Cited by 421
Cited by
Progress in bio-based plastics and plasticizing modifications
Mekonnen, T., Mussone, P., Khalil, H., & Bressler, D. (2013) · Journal of Materials Chemistry A · doi:10.1039/c3ta12555f · Cited by 831
Profile and Functional Properties of Seed Proteins from Six Pea (Pisum sativum) Genotypes
Barac, M., Cabrilo, S., Pesic, M., Stanojevic, S., Zilic, S., Macej, O., & Ristic, N. (2010) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms11124973 · Cited by 368
Functional Properties of Pea (Pisum sativum, L.) Protein Isolates Modified with Chymosin
Barać, M., Čabrilo, S., Pešić, M., Stanojević, S., Pavlićević, M., Maćej, O., & Ristić, N. (2011) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms12128372 · Cited by 113
Functional properties of protein hydrolysates from pea (Pisum sativum, L) seeds
Barac, M., Cabrilo, S., Stanojevic, S., Pesic, M., Pavlicevic, M., Zlatkovic, B., & Jankovic, M. (2012) · International Journal of Food Science & Technology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2621.2012.02993.x · Cited by 82
Recent advances in soy protein extraction technology
Zhao, Y., Tian, R., Xu, Z., Jiang, L., & Sui, X. (2023) · Journal of the American Oil Chemists' Society · doi:10.1002/aocs.12676 · Cited by 70
Metadata
- Authors
- Wu, W. U., Hettiarachchy, N. S., & Qi, M.
- Venue
- Journal of the American Oil Chemists' Society
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1998-07
- Volume
- 75
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 845-850
- ISSN
- 0003-021X (ISSN-L)
- 1558-9331
- OpenAlex
- W2093383708
- Cited by
- 271
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 0.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.