Cited by 21Artificial Intelligence in HealthcareMetaheuristic Optimization Algorithms ResearchECG Monitoring and Analysis

Hybrid optimization enabled deep learning-based ensemble classification for heart disease detection

Jayasudha, R., Suragali, Chanti, Thirukrishna, J. T., Santhosh Kumar, B.·2023·Signal, Image and Video Processing

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11760-023-02656-2

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

2 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jayasudha, R., Suragali, C., Thirukrishna, J. T., & Santhosh Kumar, B.
Affiliations
  • GMR Institute of Technology (IN)
  • Dayananda Sagar Academy of Technology and Management (IN)
Corresponding author
Jayasudha, R.
Venue
Signal, Image and Video Processing
Published
2023-08-28
Volume
17
Issue
8
Pages
4235-4244
ISSN
  • 1863-1703 (ISSN-L)
  • 1863-1711
OpenAlex
W4386225481
Cited by
21
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 3
FWCI
4.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Signal Image and Video Processing (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Metaheuristic Optimization Algorithms Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › ECG Monitoring and Analysis
Keywords
heart disease detection, ensemble classification, deep belief network, feature fusion, congruence coefficient, overlap coefficient, hybrid optimization, early diagnosis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review