The implications of cancer survivorship for spousal employment
Open accessAbstract
Background The purpose of this research was to estimate employment effects for spouses of cancer survivors who were working at the time of the cancer diagnosis. Methods Spouses of cancer survivors were drawn from the Penn State Cancer Survivor Survey. Comparable spouses of individuals without cancer were drawn from the Panel Survey of Income Dynamics. The final sample included 827 spouses of cancer survivors (542 husbands, 285 wives) and 2,766 spouses of individuals without cancer (1,459 husbands, 1,307 wives). Three employment outcomes were studied 2-6 years after diagnosis: whether working, whether working full time (35+ hours per week), and usual hours per week. We used propensity scores to match cases to controls 3:1. Results Wives of cancer survivors had a lower probability (-7.5 percentage points) of being employed 2-6 years after diagnosis (p = 0.036). They were slightly more likely to be working full time, while averaging 1.1 fewer hours per week overall, but these effects were not statistically significant. Cancer's effect on husbands was not significant for any of the employment outcomes. However, if survivor wives and husbands were working at follow-up, they had more than twice the odds of working full-time (wives OR = 2.18, p = 0.0004; husbands OR = 2.65, p = 0.012) and worked more hours per week than other spouses (wives 1.9, p = 0.041; husbands 1.5, p = 0.04). Conclusions The implications to cancer survivors and their spouses of these results is that the employment of survivor spouses, especially of wives, is somewhat reshaped by cancer in the medium to long run. However, there is little or no effect on aggregate hours worked by spouses who were employed at diagnosis.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Female caregivers consistently reported higher caregiving time and greater adverse labor and productivity outcomes, including absenteeism, presenteeism, reduced working hours, job loss, and weekly hours of unpaid care, than male caregivers.
“Women consistently reported greater labor and productivity impacts than men.”
From Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses of Time-Use, Productivity, and Labor Outcomes Among Unpaid Cancer Caregivers (2026) · cites this paper as [22]
The Results and Discussion (page not provided) report a significant reduction in employment among wives of cancer survivors, but no significant employment effect among husbands. They do not establish that women consistently experienced greater impacts: other employment outcomes for wives were not significantly worse, and the study did not measure absenteeism, presenteeism, or unpaid caregiving time. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 26
- [1]Rowland J Cancer survivorship--United States, 1971-2001 MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2004 6 25 53 24 526 9 15215740
- [2]Jemal A Clegg LX Ward E Ries LA Wu X Jamison PM Annual report to the nation on the status of cancer, 1975-2001, with a special feature regarding survival Cancer 2004 7 1 101 1 3 27 15221985
- [3]Horner MJR LAG Krapcho M Neyman N Aminou R Howlader N Altekruse SF Feuer EJ Huang L Mariotto A Miller BA Lewis DR Eisner MP Stinchcomb DG Edwards BK SEER Cancer Statistics Review 1975-2006 Bethesda, MD National Cancer Institute 2009
- [4]Short PF Vasey JJ Tunceli K Employment pathways in a large cohort of adult cancer survivors Cancer 2005 3 15 103 6 1292 301 15700265
- [5]Bradley CJ Bednarek HL Neumark D Breast cancer and women's labor supply Health Serv Res 2002 10 37 5 1309 28 12479498 PMC1464031
- [6]Bradley CJ Bednarek HL Employment patterns of long-term cancer survivors Psychooncology 2002 May-Jun 11 3 188 98 12112479
- [7]Bednarek HL Bradley CJ Work and retirement after cancer diagnosis Res Nurs Health 2005 4 28 2 126 35 15779055
- [8]Bouknight RR Bradley CJ Luo Z Correlates of return to work for breast cancer survivors J Clin Oncol 2006 1 20 24 3 345 53 16421415
- [9]Bradley CJ Neumark D Luo Z Schenk M Employment and cancer: findings from a longitudinal study of breast and prostate cancer survivors Cancer Invest 2007 2 25 1 47 54 17364557
- [10]Short PF Vasey JJ Belue R Work disability associated with cancer survivorship and other chronic conditions Psychooncology 2008 1 17 1 91 7 17429835 PMC4108285
- [11]Steiner JF Cavender TA Nowels CT Beaty BL Bradley CJ Fairclough DL The impact of physical and psychosocial factors on work characteristics after cancer Psychooncology 2008 2 17 2 138 47 17429833
- [12]Bradley CJ Bednarek HL Neumark D Breast cancer survival, work, and earnings J Health Econ 2002 9 21 5 757 79 12349881
- [13]Lauzier S Maunsell E Drolet M Coyle D Hebert-Croteau N Brisson J Wage losses in the year after breast cancer: extent and determinants among Canadian women J Natl Cancer Inst 2008 3 5 100 5 321 32 18314472
- [14]Tunceli K Short PF Moran JR Tunceli O Cancer survivorship, health insurance, and employment transitions among older workers Inquiry 2009 Spring 46 1 17 32 19489481 PMC4111898
- [15]Bradley CJ Neumark D Luo Z Bednarek HL Employment-contingent health insurance, illness, and labor supply of women: evidence from married women with breast cancer Health Econ 2007 7 16 7 719 37 17177273
- [16]Bennett JA Brown P Cameron L Whitehead LC Porter D McPherson KM Changes in employment and household income during the 24 months following a cancer diagnosis Support Care Cancer 2008 11 27 19037665
- [17]Grunfeld E Coyle D Whelan T Clinch J Reyno L Earle CC Family caregiver burden: results of a longitudinal study of breast cancer patients and their principal caregivers CMAJ 2004 6 8 170 12 1795 801 15184333 PMC419766
- [19]Lewis FM Deal LW Balancing our lives: a study of the married couple's experience with breast cancer recurrence Oncol Nurs Forum 1995 7 22 6 943 53 7567612
- [20]Short PF Mallonee EL Income disparities in the quality of life of cancer survivors Med Care 2006 1 44 1 16 23 16365608
- [22]Lechner M Some practical issues in the evaluation of heterogeneous labour market programmes by matching methods Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 2002 165 1 59 82
- [24]Coile CC Health Shocks and Couple's Labor Supply Decisions Cambridge National Bureau of Economic Research 2004 Contract No.: 10810
- [25]Van Houtven CHC NB Spousal Health Shocks and the Timing of Retirement Decisions in the Face of Forward-looking Finacnial Incentives Cambridge National Bureau of Economic Research 2010 Contract No.: 2010-7
- [26]Farley Short P Vasey JJ Moran JR Long-term effects of cancer survivorship on the employment of older workers Health Serv Res 2008 2 43 1 Pt 1 193 210 18211525 PMC2323147
- [27]Bradley CJ Neumark D Bednarek HL Schenk M Short-term effects of breast cancer on labor market attachment: results from a longitudinal study J Health Econ 2005 1 24 1 137 60 15617792
- [28]Bradley CJ Neumark D Luo Z Bednarek H Schenk M Employment outcomes of men treated for prostate cancer J Natl Cancer Inst 2005 7 6 97 13 958 65 15998948
- [29]Taskila T Lindbohm ML Factors affecting cancer survivors' employment and work ability Acta Oncol 2007 46 4 446 51 17497311
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Allman, G., Morrell, L., Meheus, F., Ilbawi, A., Soerjomataram, I., MacKay, C., Reid, F., & Euripides, M. (2026) · JCO Global Oncology · doi:10.1200/go-26-00129
- Authors
- Hollenbeak, C. S., Farley Short, P., & Moran, J.
- Affiliations
- Pennsylvania State University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Hollenbeak, Christopher S.
- Venue
- Journal of Cancer Survivorship
- Published
- 2011-03-03
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 226-234
- ISSN
- 1932-2259 (ISSN-L)
- 1932-2267
- PMC
- PMC4176691
- OpenAlex
- W2089013295
- Cited by
- 33
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3
- FWCI
- 0.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Journal of Cancer Survivorship (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Cancer Institute (R01 CA 82619, R01CA082619)
- Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R24HD041025)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Employment and Welfare Studies
- Keywords
- cancer survivorship, spousal employment, spouses of cancer patients, women's employment, full-time employment, working hours, gender differences, cancer diagnosis
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Data Collection, Employment, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Income, Male, Middle Aged, Neoplasms, Survival Rate, Case-Control Studies, Survivors, Spouses
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review