Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses of Time-Use, Productivity, and Labor Outcomes Among Unpaid Cancer Caregivers
Open accessAbstract
PURPOSE: Unpaid caregivers provide essential support for people with cancer, yet the economic burden of this labor is not well quantified. This study provides pooled estimates of caregiving time and productivity outcomes to better understand the impact of unpaid caregiving on caregivers' economic well-being. METHODS: We systematically searched PubMed and EBSCO databases in June 2025 for peer-reviewed studies reporting primary or secondary data on six prespecified caregiver outcomes related to labor and time-use. Eligible studies focused on adult cancer care and included precision measures. After screening 3,904 records and reviewing 106 full-text articles, 59 studies from 16 countries were included in the meta-analyses. Where required for comparability, outcomes were standardized to a 35-hour work week and 250 workdays per year. RESULTS: Caregivers provided an estimated 45 hours of unpaid care each week (95% CI, 31 to 58). Among employed caregivers, working hours declined by 13% (95% CI, 9 to 18). Caregivers were absent for 5% of working days (95% CI, 4 to 6) and experienced a 24% loss in workplace productivity (95% CI, 20 to 28). In addition, 30% reported reduced job responsibilities (95% CI, 24 to 37) and 1% exited employment (95% CI, –3 to 5). Burdens were greater among caregivers of people with advanced cancer and during palliative care. Women consistently reported greater labor and productivity impacts than men. CONCLUSION: Unpaid caregivers of people with cancer face substantial time- and labor-related burdens that may affect their financial stability and long-term well-being. These findings highlight the need for supportive polices and workplace practices that protect caregiver well-being and economic security throughout the cancer care continuum. They also offer essential evidence to inform policies and interventions that protect caregiver well-being, economic stability, and long-term participation in the workforce.
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
This systematic review and meta-analysis pooled 59 studies from 16 countries to estimate unpaid cancer caregivers’ time-use, productivity, and labor outcomes. It found caregivers provide about 45 unpaid hours per week, with employed caregivers showing substantial absenteeism, presenteeism, reduced work hours, and professional role reductions, especially in advanced/palliative care and among women.
Key findings
- Pooled unpaid caregiving time was 44.7 hours per week (95% CI, 30.9 to 58.4; 35 studies, 59 data points); the abstract rounds this to 45 hours (95% CI, 31 to 58). Care hours were higher for advanced cancer (64.4 hours [95% CI, 37.9 to 90.9]) than early/intermediate-stage disease (33.0 hours [95% CI, 26.5 to 39.5]).
- Among employed caregivers, reduced working hours were 13.5% (95% CI, 8.7 to 18.3; 9 studies), absenteeism was 5.0% of workdays (95% CI, 4.1 to 5.8; 15 studies), presenteeism was 24.3% (95% CI, 20.4 to 28.2; 12 studies), and professional role reduction was 30.2% (95% CI, 23.8 to 36.6; 5 studies).
- Change in employment was infrequently reported (3 studies); the text’s pooled estimate was -1.1% (95% CI, -4.8 to 2.5), indicating uncertainty whether job loss outweighs employment gain. The abstract reports 1% exited employment (95% CI, -3 to 5), and Table 1 reports 1.1% (95% CI, -2.6 to 4.8).
- Burdens were greater among caregivers of people with advanced cancer and during palliative care. Women consistently reported greater labor and productivity impacts than men; the median study sample was 60.8% women, and seven studies disaggregated outcomes by caregiver sex.
Methods
- Systematic search of PubMed and EBSCO on June 9, 2025, following PRISMA 2020; 3,904 records were screened, 106 full-text articles reviewed, and 59 studies from 16 countries met criteria for meta-analysis. Eligible studies reported primary or secondary data on six prespecified caregiver outcomes; cost-of-illness modeling studies, paid caregivers, and caregivers for youth/adolescents were excluded.
- Outcomes were harmonized where needed to a 35-hour workweek and 250 workdays per year. Multiple related effect sizes within a study were collapsed into a single study-level estimate using inverse-variance weighting; precision measures were derived when not reported. Quality/risk of bias was assessed with a structured MetaQAT-based tool.
- Random-effects inverse-variance meta-analyses were conducted in Stata 19, with DerSimonian-Laird tau² estimation. Continuous outcomes were pooled as means and binary/percentage outcomes as proportions, with 95% CIs; heterogeneity was assessed with tau², I², H², and Cochran’s Q. Prespecified subgroup analyses examined caregiver sex, cancer site, cancer stage, treatment phase, geographic region, and WHO region.
Limitations
- The paper states high statistical heterogeneity for most pooled outcomes, varied measurement tools/reference periods/analytic approaches, and that standardized 35-hour workweeks and 250-day work years may not represent all regions. It also notes that collapsing multiple estimates may mask within-study variation, that individual-level determinants beyond sex were not systematically examined, and that the evidence base is skewed toward Western/high-income countries (only 8 of 59 studies outside Europe and North America; LMIC represented by China, Nigeria, Türkiye, and Uganda).
- The paper states possible biases within component studies, including recall bias, survivorship bias, and response/recruitment bias; publication bias/small-study effects were identified for absenteeism (Egger test P < .001) and presenteeism (P = .0016), but not for unpaid caregiving hours (P = .8693).
- Evident from the text: abstract, results text, and Table 1 report inconsistent employment-change estimates and rounding; no studies came from the Eastern Mediterranean or South-East Asian regions; only the Americas provided measurements of every outcome; some site-specific estimates relied on single studies; and sex-difference estimates had considerable CI overlap.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
11 of 27 cited sources checked · 5 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured
- Findingcitation
One multisite US study reported variation in caregivers' professional role reduction by cancer site, with the highest rates among caregivers for hematologic (46%) and colorectal cancers (45%), and lower rates among those caring for patients with breast (36%) or prostate cancers (20%).
“One multisite study in the United States reported variation in caregivers' professional role reduction by cancer site, with the highest rates among caregivers for hematologic (46%) and colorectal cancers (45%), and lower rates among those caring for patients with breast (36%) or prostate cancers (20%).21”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [21] source
The Methods (Data sources and Analyses; page not provided) describe two US surveys and an analysis of caregivers’ employment changes by cancer site. The Results (Extended employment changes; page not provided) report overall rates of 25% and 29%, but our copy does not report the claimed hematologic, colorectal, breast, or prostate rates or establish their ranking. (LLM, conf=0.78)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Studies from LMIC and non-Western countries remain underrepresented in large databases like PubMed and EBSCO.
“Although large databases like PubMed and EBSCO make efforts to index publications of diverse languages and geographic origins, studies from LMIC and non-Western countries remain underrepresented.35”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [35] source
Section 2.2 reports that only 2.7% of Nigerian biomedical journals were indexed in PubMed/MEDLINE, supporting a narrower version of the underrepresentation claim. The paper’s broader findings concern African journals in Web of Science, Scopus, and CrossRef; the cited passages do not establish underrepresentation in EBSCO or the claimed indexing efforts by PubMed and EBSCO. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Findingown data
The pooled estimate of unpaid caregiving time among unpaid cancer caregivers was 44.7 hours per week (95% CI, 30.9 to 58.4).
“Caregivers provided an estimated 45 hours of unpaid care each week (95% CI, 31 to 58).”
- Also stated in: § Weekly Hours of Unpaid Care · plain
“The pooled estimate for unpaid caregiving time was 44.7 hours per week (95% CI, 30.9 to 58.4).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § Weekly Hours of Unpaid Care · plain
- Findingown data
Absenteeism was higher among caregivers of patients diagnosed at advanced stages (10.6%; 95% CI, 6.4 to 14.9) than among caregivers of patients with intermediate (5.0%; 95% CI, 3.8 to 6.3) or early-stage cancers (2%; 95% CI, 2.0 to 2.0).
“Absenteeism was higher among caregivers of patients diagnosed at advanced stages (10.6%[95% CI, 6.4 to 14.9]) compared with intermediate (5.0% [95% CI, 3.8 to 6.3]) and early-stage cancers (2% [95% CI, 2.0 to 2.0]).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Among employed caregivers, the pooled rate of reduced working hours was 13.5% (95% CI, 8.7 to 18.3).
“Among employed caregivers, working hours declined by 13% (95% CI, 9 to 18).”
- Also stated in: § Reduced Working Hours · plain
“The pooled rate of reduced working hours among employed caregivers was 13.5% (95% CI, 8.7 to 18.3), with very high heterogeneity (I 2 > 98%).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § Reduced Working Hours · plain
- Findingown data
Presenteeism was somewhat higher among caregivers supporting patients with advanced-stage cancer (26.2%; 95% CI, 19.1 to 33.2) than among those caring for individuals with early- or intermediate-stage disease (23.2%; 95% CI, 18.0 to 28.3), with high overlap in CIs.
“Caregivers supporting patients with advanced-stage cancer had somewhat higher presenteeism (26.2% [95% CI, 19.1 to 33.2]) than those caring for individuals with early-or intermediate-stage disease (23.2% [95% CI, 18.0 to 28.3]), with high overlap in CIs.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The pooled presenteeism rate was 24.3% (95% CI, 20.4 to 28.2).
“and experienced a 24% loss in workplace productivity (95% CI, 20 to 28).”
- Also stated in: § Presenteeism · hedged
“The pooled presenteeism rate was estimated at 24.3% (95% CI, 20.4 to 28.2), with substantial heterogeneity (I 2 > 91.8%).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § Presenteeism · hedged
- Findingown data
The pooled rate of reduced professional role or responsibilities was 30.2% (95% CI, 23.8 to 36.6).
“In addition, 30% reported reduced job responsibilities (95% CI, 24 to 37)”
- Also stated in: § Reduced Professional Role or Responsibilities · plain
“with the overall pooled estimate amounting to 30.2% (95% CI, 23.8 to 36.6).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § Reduced Professional Role or Responsibilities · plain
- Findingown data
Care hours were higher for caregivers supporting individuals with advanced cancer (64.4 hours per week; 95% CI, 37.9 to 90.9) than for early- or intermediate-stage disease (33.0 hours per week; 95% CI, 26.5 to 39.5).
“Care hours were higher for caregivers supporting individuals with advanced cancer (64.4 hours [95% CI, 37.9 to 90.9]) compared with early-or intermediate-stage disease (33.0 hours [95% CI, 26.5 to 39.5]).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The pooled caregiver absenteeism rate was 5.0% of workdays (95% CI, 4.1 to 5.8).
“Caregivers were absent for 5% of working days (95% CI, 4 to 6)”
- Also stated in: § Absenteeism · plain
“The pooled caregiver absenteeism rate was 5.0% of workdays (95% CI, 4.1 to 5.8), with very high heterogeneity (I 2 > 98%).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § Absenteeism · plain
- Findingown data
The body of literature identified by the analysis skews strongly toward high-income, Western countries.
“Like previous systematic reviews of the subject, the body of literature identified by our analysis skews strongly toward high-income, Western countries.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingreasoning
Estimated weekly care hours in Africa are particularly high.
“Estimated weekly care hours in Africa are particularly high, a finding which may point toward differences in culture, health system resources for outpatient care, or caregiver labor markets and opportunity costs.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingreasoning
These biases are partially mitigated.
“These biases are partially mitigated.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
No evidence of asymmetry was detected for unpaid caregiving hours (P 5 .8693).
“No evidence of asymmetry was detected for unpaid caregiving hours (P 5 .8693).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Pooled estimates varied across phases of the cancer care continuum.
“Pooled estimates varied across phases of the cancer care continuum.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
Comparison groups in 19% of studies control for confounding but not sampling, response, or recall bias.
“Comparison groups in 19% of studies control for confounding but not sampling, response, or recall bias.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Pooled estimates indicate that caregivers provide over 40 hours of unpaid care per week.
“Pooled estimates indicate that caregivers provide over 40 hours of unpaid care per week, reflecting considerable time commitment and economic sacrifice.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Only 11 studies (19%) included a comparison group from the general population or caregivers for other chronic conditions to enhance the validity of their findings.
“However, only 11 studies (19%) included a comparison group from the general population or caregivers for other chronic conditions to enhance the validity of their findings.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
This review reflects the evidence base's persistent Western and high-income skew.
“Fourth, this review reflects the evidence base's persistent Western and high-income skew.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
Several studies reported multiple related estimates (eg, by cancer stage, treatment phase, or demographic subgroup).
“Second, several studies reported multiple related estimates (eg, by cancer stage, treatment phase, or demographic subgroup).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
No studies were included from the Eastern Mediterranean or South-East Asian regions.
“To begin, no studies were included from the Eastern Mediterranean or South-East Asian regions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingreasoning
The ability to compare caregiver outcomes by the care recipient's cancer site remains limited.
“Despite the breadth of literature included in this analysis, the ability to compare caregiver outcomes by the care recipient's cancer site remains limited.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Among studies of primary data, 20% used unvalidated collection tools, primary bespoke caregiver surveys.
“Among studies of primary data, 20% used unvalidated collection tools, primary bespoke caregiver surveys.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Heterogeneity across studies for unpaid caregiving time was substantial (I2 > 99%).
“Heterogeneity across studies was substantial (I 2 > 99%), reflecting variation in study populations, cancer types, and measurement approaches.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingnone given
The Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire was the only validated instrument used by multiple studies to measure productivity loss.
“The Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire was the only validated instrument used by multiple studies to measure productivity loss, while the most frequently cited secondary data source was the US Medical Expenditure Panel Survey.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
All studies met the quality criteria for relevance, reflecting clear descriptions of study contexts, target populations, and outcomes.
“All studies met the quality criteria for relevance, reflecting clear descriptions of study contexts, target populations, and outcomes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Reduced work hours are highest during pretreatment and diagnosis, declining throughout the active treatment, maintenance and monitoring, and palliative care phases.
“Reduced work hours are the highest during pretreatment and diagnosis, declining throughout the active treatment, maintenance and monitoring, and palliative care phases.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
Information on caregiver occupation was rarely reported.
“Information on caregiver occupation was rarely reported.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Caregivers in this meta-analysis were predominantly female, with the median study sample consisting of 60.8% women.
“Caregivers in this meta-analysis were predominantly female, with the median study sample consisting of 60.8% women.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The pooled estimate for reduced work hours is 13.5% (95% CI, 8.7 to 18.3).
“| Reduced work hours | 9 | 16 | 13.5 (8.7 to 18.3) |”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The pooled estimate for rate of professional role reduction is 30.2% (95% CI, 23.8 to 36.6).
“| Rate of professional role reduction | 5 | 12 | 30.2 (23.8 to 36.6) |”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The pooled estimate for absenteeism rate is 5.0% (95% CI, 4.1 to 5.8).
“| Absenteeism rate | 15 | 20 | 5.0 (4.1 to 5.8) |”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The pooled estimate for presenteeism rate is 24.3% (95% CI, 20.4 to 28.2).
“| Presenteeism rate | 12 | 17 | 24.3 (20.4 to 28.2) |”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The pooled estimate for change in employment is 1.1% (95% CI, -2.6 to 4.8).
“| Change in employment | 3 | 9 | 1.1 (-2.6 to 4.8) |”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The pooled estimate for weekly care hours is 44.7 (95% CI, 30.9 to 58.4).
“| Weekly care hours | 35 | 59 | 44.7 (30.9 to 58.4) |”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Evidence consistently shows that women provide a disproportionate share of unpaid caregiving.
“Despite women's growing labor force participation, evidence consistently shows they provide a disproportionate share of unpaid caregiving.3”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [3] source
- Premisecitation
The nature and intensity of caregiving vary by cancer site, disease stage, and patient health status.
“The nature and intensity of caregiving vary by cancer site, disease stage, and patient health status. 2”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [2] source
- Premisecitation
Findings from the World Ovarian Cancer Coalition's Every Woman Studies show that, for ovarian cancer, a higher proportion of patients report requiring and receiving unpaid support in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) compared with high-income countries.
“Findings from the World Ovarian Cancer Coalition's Every Woman Studies show that, for ovarian cancer, a higher proportion of patients report requiring and receiving unpaid support in low-and middle-income countries (LMICs) compared with high-income countries.8”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [8]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
US caregivers for colorectal and hematological cancers relinquish professional responsibilities more often than caregivers for breast and prostate cancer.
“de Moor et al 21 reported that US caregivers for colorectal and hematological cancers relinquish professional responsibilities more often than caregivers for breast and prostate cancer.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites de Moor et al 21
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Study design and conductown data
For all three outcomes, interpretation was limited by substantial between-study heterogeneity (I 2 > 90%).
“For all three outcomes, interpretation was limited by substantial between-study heterogeneity (I 2 > 90%).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductown data
Absenteeism and presenteeism estimates in the pretreatment and terminal phases were based on a small number of studies, resulting in imprecise pooled estimates.
“Absenteeism and presenteeism estimates in the pretreatment and terminal were based on a small number of studies, resulting in imprecise pooled estimates.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationcitation
The gendered disparity in labor outcomes is largely upheld by comparison groups within individual studies.
“Nonetheless, the gendered disparity in labor outcomes is largely upheld by comparison groups within individual studies.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationnone given
Economic and professional consequences of unpaid caregiving disproportionately affect women, particularly those with lower levels of education or earning potential.
“Economic and professional consequences of unpaid caregiving disproportionately affect women, particularly those with lower levels of education or earning potential.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Different caregiver recruitment methods may introduce response biases.
“Beyond recall bias and survivorship bias, different caregiver recruitment methods may introduce response biases.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Study design and conductreasoning
This review provides limited insight into individual-level determinants of caregiver burden beyond sex.
“Third, this review provides limited insight into individuallevel determinants of caregiver burden beyond sex.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Study design and conductnone given
Outcomes were harmonized to ensure comparability across studies.
“Outcomes were harmonized to ensure comparability across studies.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationnone given
Caregiver time use and labor force participation vary geographically, reflecting differences in culture, health systems, labor markets, social policy, and cancer burden.
“Caregiver time use and labor force participation vary geographically, reflecting differences in culture, health systems, labor markets, social policy, and cancer burden.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Among older women in the United States, those with more education and income are more likely to retire and provide informal care.
“Dentinger and Clarkberg 32 report that among older women in the United States, those with more education and income are more likely to retire and provide informal care.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Dentinger and Clarkberg 32
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Study design and conductnone given
Caregiver age, education level, income, and type of employment were not systematically examined.
“Caregiver age, education level, income, and type of employment were not systematically examined but warrant further investigation, as emerging evidence suggests their importance.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Male caregivers in Canada devote fewer hours to care than their female counterparts.
“Cuthbert et al 23 likewise find that male caregivers in Canada devote fewer hours to care than their female counterparts.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Cuthbert et al 23
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
Evidence from the United States indicates variation by socioeconomic status.
“However, evidence from the United States indicates variation by socioeconomic status.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The Western Pacific regional estimate likely suffers from the opposite effect, as one of the three contributing studies was conducted during pretreatment and reported low care hours.
“The Western Pacific regional estimate likely suffers from the opposite effect, as one of the three contributing studies was conducted during pretreatment and reported low care hours.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Job loss is higher among caregiving wives than caregiving husbands.
“Another Canadian study by Jeon and Pohl 20 estimates that job loss is higher among caregiving wives than caregiving husbands.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Jeon and Pohl 20
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationreasoning
The African estimate is potentially elevated because both time-use data points extracted from African studies survey caregivers during patients' active treatment, a relatively high-burden phase of care.
“However, this estimate is also potentially elevated because both time-use data points extracted from African studies survey caregivers during patients' active treatment, a relatively high-burden phase of care.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 27
- May combine two claims. 43
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationKamal et al show that employed caregivers reduce working hours and experience other forms of productivity loss.
“Meanwhile, Kamal et al 7 show that employed caregivers reduce working hours and experience other forms of productivity loss.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [7] source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationHutchinson et al estimated across 11 counties that patients with ovarian cancer receive an average of 800 hours of unpaid care per year.
“Hutchinson et al 6 estimated across 11 counties that patients with ovarian cancer receive an average of 800 hours of unpaid care per year.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [6] source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationA Canadian labor market study found that female caregivers were 73% more likely than men to leave the labor force and five times more likely to reduce working hours.
“A Canadian labor market study found that female caregivers were 73% more likely than men to leave the labor force and five times more likely to reduce working hours.5”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [5] source
The Abstract Results report that, after adjustment for labor-market roles, women were 73% more likely than men to leave the labor market and more than five times more likely to work part-time due to informal care. The fivefold figure applies specifically to working part-time, not to every form of reduced working hours. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationFemale caregivers consistently reported higher caregiving time and greater adverse labor and productivity outcomes, including absenteeism, presenteeism, reduced working hours, job loss, and weekly hours of unpaid care, than male caregivers.
“Women consistently reported greater labor and productivity impacts than men.”
- Also stated in: § Differences in Labor and Productivity Outcomes by Sex · plain
“Seven studies disaggregated outcomes by caregiver sex, with female caregivers consistently reporting higher caregiving time and greater adverse labor and productivity outcomes including absenteeism, presenteeism, reduced working hours, job loss, and weekly hours of unpaid care.20,[22][23][24][25][26][27]”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 3 sources checked- cites [20] source
The regression results report larger relative earnings losses for women (5.9%) than men (3.4%), but similar employment reductions of about 2.4 percentage points. The Discussion also describes the gender difference as only slight. Our copy does not establish the claimed differences in caregiving time, absenteeism, presenteeism, job loss, or unpaid-care hours. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [22] source
The Results and Discussion (page not provided) report a significant reduction in employment among wives of cancer survivors, but no significant employment effect among husbands. They do not establish that women consistently experienced greater impacts: other employment outcomes for wives were not significantly worse, and the study did not measure absenteeism, presenteeism, or unpaid caregiving time. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [23] source
- Also stated in: § Differences in Labor and Productivity Outcomes by Sex · plain
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationResearch on the economic burden of cancer caregiving remains limited and concentrated in high-income, Western countries.
“Despite increasing attention, research on the economic burden of cancer caregiving remains limited and concentrated in high-income, Western countries.7”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [7] source
The ‘Effect of Cancer Treatments on Caregiver Work Productivity’ section reports that 16 of 62 reviewed studies evaluated caregiver productivity, supporting a limited evidence base for that aspect of caregiving costs. ‘Overall Study Characteristics’ lists countries for the review as a whole, including several outside the West, but does not establish that caregiver-specific economic-burden research was concentrated in high-income Western countries. The review is also limited to treatment-related work productivity rather than the full economic burden of caregiving; page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationEvidence in LMIC is sparse, and estimates from lower-income settings may understate severity because diagnoses come later, survival is lower, caregiving durations are shorter, and weak data systems preclude long-term follow-up.
“Evidence there is sparse, and estimates from lower-income settings may understate severity because diagnoses come later, survival is lower, caregiving durations are shorter, and weak data systems preclude long-term follow-up.29”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [29] source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductreasoningAll authors codeveloped a structured risk-of-bias and quality assessment based on the MetaQAT framework to evaluate relevance, reliability, applicability, and validity.
“Because included studies used diverse observational designs, all authors codeveloped a structured risk-of-bias and quality assessment based on the MetaQAT framework to evaluate relevance, reliability, applicability, and validity.13”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [13] source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductcitationThe review followed PRISMA 2020 guidelines.
“We followed guidelines from the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (2020).10”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [10] source
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe pooled estimate for change in employment status was -1.1% (95% CI, -4.8 to 2.5), indicating uncertainty whether caregiver job loss outweighs employment gain.
“and 1% exited employment (95% CI, -3 to 5).”
- Also stated in: § Change in Employment Status (job loss) · hedged
“The over pooled estimate was -1.1% (95% CI, -4.8 to 2.5), indicating uncertainty whether caregiver job loss outweighs employment gain.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Also stated in: § Change in Employment Status (job loss) · hedged
May combine two claims.
Findingnone givenStudies conducted in Europe estimate that weekly hours of care, reduced work hours, and rates of absenteeism are higher than those found in the Americas.
“Studies conducted in Europe estimate that weekly hours of care, reduced work hours, and rates of absenteeism are higher than those found in the Americas.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingreasoningCaregivers in the Americas demonstrate lower absenteeism and higher presenteeism than counterparts in other regions.
“Caregivers in the Americas demonstrate lower absenteeism and higher presenteeism than counterparts in other regions, possibly because of a lack of supportive labor laws and workplace policies for caregiving.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataSample sizes were generally robust; excluding comparison groups, only six studies reported outcomes based on samples of fewer than 50 individuals.
“Sample sizes were generally robust; excluding comparison groups, only six studies reported outcomes based on samples of fewer than 50 individuals.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataEmpirical methods to measure bias were infrequently applied, with the most common approach being comparison of survey respondents and nonrespondents.
“Empirical methods to measure bias were infrequently applied, with the most common approach being comparison of survey respondents and nonrespondents.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataPresenteeism and weekly hours of unpaid care reach their highest levels during palliative care.
“Presenteeism and weekly hours of unpaid care also reach their highest levels during palliative care.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataBasic sample demographics were reported by 95% of studies, although some patient surveys of unpaid care utilization did not report caregiver age or sex.
“Basic sample demographics were reported by 95% of studies, although some patient surveys of unpaid care utilization did not report caregiver age or sex.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingnone givenAbsenteeism follows a similar trajectory to reduced work hours, but returns to peak levels during palliative care.
“Absenteeism follows a similar trajectory, but instead returns to peak levels during palliative care.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataObjective measures of caregiver burden, such as hours of care or task lists, were reported in 71% of studies, while subjective measures of caregiver burden, stress, or support were featured in 56%.
“Objective measures of caregiver burden, such as hours of care or task lists, were reported in 71% of studies, while subjective measures of caregiver burden, stress, or support were featured in 56%.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingreasoningHigh statistical heterogeneity was observed for most pooled outcomes, limiting comparability of results across cancer sites and global regions.
“High statistical heterogeneity was observed for most pooled outcomes, limiting comparability of results across cancer sites and global regions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataOnly care hours were reported across all four remaining regions, and no region other than the Americas provided measurements of every outcome.
“Only care hours were reported across all four remaining regions, and no region other than the Americas provided measurements of every outcome.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataMany studies described potential sources of sample and response bias, although 5 (12%) did not report such limitations when applicable.
“Many studies described potential sources of sample and response bias, although 5 (12%) did not report such limitations when applicable.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Findingnone givenAll secondary data sources were assessed as authoritative and reliable.
“All secondary data sources were assessed as authoritative and reliable.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingnone givenMost employed caregivers remain in the workforce, but they exhibit increased absenteeism, reduced workplace productivity, and in some cases, decreased professional responsibilities.
“Although most employed caregivers remain in the workforce, they exhibit increased absenteeism, reduced workplace productivity, and in some cases, decreased professional responsibilities.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataJust over half (52.5%) of included studies reported cancer site-specific outcome measures.
“Just over half (52.5%) of included studies reported cancer site-specific outcome measures.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingnone givenMeasurement tools, reference periods, and analytic approaches varied widely across studies, as do contextual factors like cultural norms, availability of formal care services, and labor market structures.
“Measurement tools, reference periods, and analytic approaches varied widely across studies, as do contextual factors like cultural norms, availability of formal care services, and labor market structures.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingreasoningSome site-specific estimates relied on single studies, limiting comparability because of heterogeneous study designs, samples, and measurement approaches.
“Some site-specific estimates relied on single studies, limiting comparability because of heterogeneous study designs, samples, and measurement approaches.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingnone givenEvery study was determined to have applied appropriate statistical methods and reported effect estimates with associated measures of uncertainty.
“Every study was determined to have applied appropriate statistical methods and reported effect estimates with associated measures of uncertainty.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingnone givenCare hours and rates of professional role reduction in the Americas are comparable with the Western Pacific.
“At the same time, care hours and rates of professional role reduction in the Americas are comparable with the Western Pacific.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingnone givenProspective methods were applied in 34% of studies, 22% used authoritative secondary data sources, and four-fifths of primary studies used validated instruments.
“Prospective methods were applied in 34% of studies, 22% used authoritative secondary data sources, and four-fifths of primary studies used validated instruments.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe 59 articles included in this systematic review perform well on the abbreviated quality assessment, with the average study fulfilling 12.5 of the 15 criteria.
“The 59 articles included in this systematic review perform well on the abbreviated quality assessment, with the average study fulfilling 12.5 of the 15 criteria.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataReduced working hours varied across cancer types, with pooled rates highest for lung cancer (23.0%; 95% CI, -7.7 to 53.8) and blood cancer (17.1%; 95% CI, -16.8 to 51.1) and lowest for breast cancer (7.6%; 95% CI, 1.9 to 13.3).
“Reduced working hours varied across cancer types, although subgroup estimates were imprecise because of small sample sizes.Pooled rates were the highest for lung cancer (23.0%[95% CI, -7.7 to 53.8]) and blood cancer (17.1% [95% CI, -16.8 to 51.1]) caregivers and the lowest for breast cancer caregivers (7.6% [95% CI, 1.9 to 13.3]).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataOnly eight of the 59 included studies originate from outside of Europe and North America, with China, Nigeria, Türkiye, and Uganda being the only LMIC represented.
“Only eight of the 59 included studies originate from outside of Europe and North America, with China, Nigeria, T ¨ urkiye, and Uganda being the only LMIC represented.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataEvidence of small-study effects was identified for absenteeism (Egger test P < .001) and presenteeism (P 5 .0016), suggesting possible funnel-plot asymmetry for these outcomes.
“Evidence of smallstudy effects was identified for absenteeism (Egger test P < .001)and presenteeism (P 5 .0016),suggesting possible funnel-plot asymmetry for these outcomes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingnone givenMost studies did not specify cancer type or report results for multiple cancer sites.
“Most studies did not specify cancer type or report results for multiple cancer sites.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation60% of new cancer cases occur in LMICs.
“As 60% of new cancer cases occur LMIC, there is a critical need for broader evidence that captures caregiver burden across diverse health systems, labor markets, and geographic contexts.9”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [9]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataUnpaid caregivers of people with cancer face substantial time- and labor-related burdens that may affect their financial stability and long-term wellbeing.
“Unpaid caregivers of people with cancer face substantial time-and laborrelated burdens that may affect their financial stability and long-term wellbeing.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe International Labor Organization estimated in 2018 that women perform 76.2% of unpaid care work worldwide.
“The International Labor Organization estimated in 2018 that women perform 76.2% of unpaid care work worldwide, which can restrict their access to economic opportunities and reinforce existing inequities.4”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [4]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenThe study protocol was not prospectively registered in any database.
“The study protocol was not prospectively registered in any database.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationUnpaid care hours in the United States are highest for lung cancer, ovarian cancer, and non-Hodgkin lymphoma caregivers, and lowest for breast cancer caregivers.
“Yabroff and Kim 2 reported that unpaid care hours in the United States are highest for lung cancer, ovarian cancer, and non-Hodgkin lymphoma caregivers, and lowest for breast cancer caregivers.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Yabroff and Kim 2
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataTwo authors independently screened abstracts and conducted full-text review.
“Two authors (G.A., L.M.) independently screened abstracts and subsequently conducted full-text review of 106 articles, including seven systematic reviews.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductreasoningTo avoid overweighting these studies, we applied a consistent inverse-variance collapsing procedure to derive a single study-level estimate before contributing results to the meta-analysis.
“To avoid overweighting these studies, we applied a consistent inverse-variance collapsing procedure to derive a single study-level estimate before contributing results to the meta-analysis.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataPublication bias and small-study effects were assessed for outcomes with at least 10 independent study-level effect estimates.
“Publication bias and small-study effects were assessed for outcomes with at least 10 independent study-level effect estimates.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationreasoningOur findings should be interpreted cautiously in LMIC contexts where caregiving structures, labor markets, and social protections differ from the high-income settings of most studies.
“Our findings should be interpreted cautiously in LMIC contexts where caregiving structures, labor markets, and social protections differ from the high-income settings of most studies.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationGreater productivity loss is reported among caregivers supporting patients with advanced cancer, and absenteeism and presenteeism were correlated with care hours.
“Mazanec et al 34 reported greater productivity loss among caregivers supporting patients with advanced cancer and demonstrated that absenteeism and presenteeism were correlated with care hours.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Mazanec et al 34
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Study design and conductnone givenStandardized 35-hour workweeks and 250-day work years may not be representative of labor customs in all regions.
“Furthermore, standardized 35-hour workweeks and 250-day work years may not be representative of labor customs in all regions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationUS caregivers for breast cancer reduce fewer working hours than caregivers for lung cancer, but exhibit greater presenteeism.
“Finally, Chiu et al 28 found that US caregivers for breast cancer reduce fewer working hours than caregivers for lung cancer, but exhibit greater presenteeism.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Chiu et al 28
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationHigher presenteeism is found among working caregivers with white-collar jobs and college degrees.
“For example, Keita Fakeye et al 33 find higher presenteeism among working caregivers with white-collar jobs and college degrees.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Keita Fakeye et al 33
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenPrespecified subgroup analyses were conducted when sufficient data were available.
“Prespecified subgroup analyses were conducted when sufficient data were available.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenGendered social expectations and cultural norms surrounding work, family, and caregiving likely contribute to the observed sex-based differences.
“Gendered social expectations and cultural norms surrounding work, family, and caregiving likely contribute to the observed sex-based differences.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataThe pooled estimates consistently illustrate more severe labor consequences for women compared with men, but these results should be interpreted cautiously.
“Although the pooled estimates consistently illustrate more severe labor consequences for women compared with men, these results should be interpreted cautiously because of”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenFindings of gender-based disparities in labor and productivity outcomes are consistent with evidence from the International Labor Organization and other research groups.
“Findings of gender-based disparities in labor and productivity outcomes are consistent with evidence from the International Labor Organization and other research groups.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningIt is possible that the aggregated results of this meta-analysis reflect biases within its component studies.
“Finally, it is possible that the aggregated results of this meta-analysis reflect biases within its component studies.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationFemale caregivers in the United States have higher absenteeism and presenteeism rates than their male counterparts, although men in the study sample contributed marginally higher care hours.
“Finally, Fong et al 24 conclude that female caregivers in the United States boast higher absenteeism and presenteeism rates than their male counterparts, although they also find marginally higher care hours contributed by men in their study sample.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Fong et al 24
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisereasoningComparable registries of caregivers are rare.
“Although research on cancer patients can identify and anonymize research subjects in databases of electronic medical records or insurance claims, comparable registries of caregivers are rare.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenFunnel plots were constructed to assess publication bias and small-study effects for outcomes with at least 10 independent study-level estimates.
“Funnel plots, included in the Data Supplement, were also constructed to assess publication bias and small-study effects for outcomes with at least 10 independent study-level estimates.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningNarrow CIs for European and American outcome estimates reflect the strong depth of research in these geographies, while estimates from other regions represent comparatively fewer studies and greater uncertainty.
“Narrow CIs for European and American outcome estimates reflect the strong depth of research in these geographies, while estimates from other regions represent comparatively fewer studies and greater uncertainty.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Pooled findings from high-income Western studies may not hold true in lower-income and non-Western settings.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationCaregiving husbands in the United States make smaller reductions in their work hours, and provide fewer care hours, than caregiving wives.
“Hollenbeak et al 22 find that caregiving husbands in the United States make smaller reductions in their work hours, and provide fewer care hours, than caregiving wives.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Hollenbeak et al 22
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataComprehensive regional comparisons are precluded by the evidence base's skew toward high-income, Western countries, with evidence gaps persisting for certain outcome measures across geographic contexts.
“Comprehensive regional comparisons are precluded by the evidence base's skew toward high-income, Western countries, with evidence gaps persisting for certain outcome measures across geographic contexts.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Pooled findings from high-income Western studies may not hold true in lower-income and non-Western settings.
May combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningAlthough this method ensured comparability across studies and prevented disproportionate influence from any single source, it may mask important within-study variation across phases of care or patient subgroups.
“Although this method ensured comparability across studies and prevented disproportionate influence from any single source, it may mask important within-study variation across phases of care or patient subgroups.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductreasoningRandom-effects models were chosen in advance to account for heterogeneity in study designs, populations, and measurement approaches.
“Random-effects models were chosen in advance to account for heterogeneity in study designs, populations, and measurement approaches”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenRecruitment through clinics or patients overrepresents highly engaged caregivers, while recruitment through support groups emphasizes high-burden and care-seeking individuals, and online surveys lean toward younger and higher-income demographics.
“Recruitment through clinics or patients overrepresents highly engaged caregivers, while recruitment through support groups emphasizes high-burden and care-seeking individuals, and online surveys lean toward younger and higher-income demographics.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThe associated productivity loss represents a broader social cost and contributes meaningfully to the overall socioeconomic burden of cancer.
“Although the burden of caregiving is felt most acutely at the individual and household levels, this review suggests that the associated productivity loss represents a broader social cost and contributes meaningfully to the overall socioeconomic burden of cancer.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenCancer treatment strains patients financially, and this burden compounds when a caregiving family member must reduce or forgo employment.
“Cancer treatment strains patients financially, and this burden compounds when a caregiving family member must reduce or forgo employment.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenAs life expectancy and the burden of noncommunicable diseases rise, unpaid caregiving becomes increasingly integral to health care systems worldwide.
“In conclusion, as life expectancy and the burden of noncommunicable diseases rise, unpaid caregiving becomes increasingly integral to health care systems worldwide.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThese impacts are unevenly distributed, with women providing more unpaid care and experiencing greater economic and professional consequences than men.
“These impacts are unevenly distributed, with women providing more unpaid care and experiencing greater economic and professional consequences than men.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
The paper relies on this without support.
Unpaid care may be more central to cancer care and recovery in lower-income and non-Western settings than in high-income Western settings.
“where unpaid care may be even more central to cancer care and recovery”
The paper relies on this without support.
Pooled findings from high-income Western studies may not hold true in lower-income and non-Western settings.
“pooled findings may not hold true in lower-income and non-Western settings”
The paper relies on this without support.
Time and productivity costs incurred by caregivers are overlooked by routine health expenditure reporting.
“Time and productivity costs incurred by caregivers are overlooked by routine health expenditure reporting.”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Pooled employment-change estimate has opposite signs
MajorThe results text reports a pooled change of -1.1%, whereas Table 1 reports +1.1%. This reverses the direction of the point estimate under the text's stated convention that negative values represent job loss.
“The over pooled estimate was -1.1% (95% CI, -4.8 to 2.5)”
“| Change in employment | 3 | 9 | 1.1 (-2.6 to 4.8) |”
A reported study contradicts the claim of consistently higher care time for women
MinorThe sex-disaggregated results say female caregivers consistently reported higher caregiving time, but the same section says one study found marginally higher care hours among men.
“female caregivers consistently reporting higher caregiving time and greater adverse labor and productivity outcomes including absenteeism, presenteeism, reduced working hours, job loss, and weekly hours of unpaid care.”
“although they also find marginally higher care hours contributed by men in their study sample.”
Screened-record count differs from the PRISMA figure
MinorThe text says 3,904 records were screened, but the PRISMA figure reports 3,902.
“The search identified 3,904 records for title and abstract screening.”
“Records screened (title, abstract, and keywords) (n = 3,902)”
Cites
The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews
Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., et al. (2021) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.n71 · Cited by 108,283 · see citing works
Meta-analysis in clinical trials
DerSimonian, R., & Laird, N. (1986) · Controlled Clinical Trials · doi:10.1016/0197-2456(86)90046-2 · Cited by 39,552 · see citing works
Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P. T., & Rothstein, H. R. (2009) · doi:10.1002/9780470743386 · Cited by 14,225 · see citing works
The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews
Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., et al. (2021) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.03.001 · Cited by 4,265 · see citing works
Grunfeld, E. (2004) · Canadian Medical Association Journal · doi:10.1503/cmaj.1031205 · Cited by 963 · see citing works
Lilly, M. B., Laporte, A., & Coyte, P. C. (2007) · Milbank Quarterly · doi:10.1111/j.1468-0009.2007.00504.x · Cited by 372 · see citing works
Time costs associated with informal caregiving for cancer survivors
Yabroff, K. R., & Kim, Y. (2009) · Cancer · doi:10.1002/cncr.24588 · Cited by 303 · see citing works
Informal Caregiving and Retirement Timing among Men and Women
Dentinger, E., & Clarkberg, M. E. (2002) · Journal of Family Issues · doi:10.1177/019251302236598 · Cited by 242 · see citing works
Work productivity and health of informal caregivers of persons with advanced cancer
Mazanec, S. R., Daly, B. J., Douglas, S. L., & Lipson, A. R. (2011) · Research in Nursing & Health · doi:10.1002/nur.20461 · Cited by 130 · see citing works
Demography of Informal Caregiving
Agree, E. M., & Glaser, K. (2009) · International Handbook of Population Aging · doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-8356-3_29 · Cited by 106 · see citing works
Employment implications of informal cancer caregiving
de Moor, J. S., Dowling, E. C., Ekwueme, D. U., Guy, G. P., Rodriguez, J., Virgo, K. S., Han, X., Kent, E. E., Li, C., Litzelman, K., et al. (2017) · Journal of Cancer Survivorship · doi:10.1007/s11764-016-0560-5 · Cited by 100 · see citing works
Rosella, L., Bowman, C., Pach, B., Morgan, S., Fitzpatrick, T., & Goel, V. (2016) · Public Health · doi:10.1016/j.puhe.2015.10.027 · Cited by 90 · see citing works
Health and work in the family: Evidence from spouses’ cancer diagnoses
Jeon, S.-H., & Pohl, R. V. (2017) · Journal of Health Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jhealeco.2016.12.008 · Cited by 88 · see citing works
Kamal, K. M., Covvey, J. R., Dashputre, A., Ghosh, S., Shah, S., Bhosle, M., & Zacker, C. (2017) · Journal of Managed Care & Specialty Pharmacy · doi:10.18553/jmcp.2017.23.2.136 · Cited by 82 · see citing works
Keita, M., Samuel, L. J., Drabo, E. F., Bandeen‐Roche, K., & Wolff, J. L. (2022) · Value in Health · doi:10.1016/j.jval.2022.06.014 · Cited by 82 · see citing works
A comparative study of the coverage of African journals in Web of Science, Scopus, and CrossRef
Asubiaro, T. V., & Onaolapo, S. (2023) · Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.24758 · Cited by 77 · see citing works
Demographic, health, and economic transitions and the future care burden
King, E. M., Randolph, H., Floro, M. S., & Suh, J. (2021) · World Development · doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105371 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
Indirect costs associated with metastatic breast cancer
Wan, Y., Gao, X. Y., Mehta, S., Wang, Z., Faria, C., & Schwartzberg, L. S. (2013) · Journal of Medical Economics · doi:10.3111/13696998.2013.826228 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
Working, Low Income, and Cancer Caregiving: Financial and Mental Health Impacts
Bradley, C. J., Kitchen, S., & Owsley, K. M. (2023) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.22.02537 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
The implications of cancer survivorship for spousal employment
Hollenbeak, C. S., Farley Short, P., & Moran, J. (2011) · Journal of Cancer Survivorship · doi:10.1007/s11764-011-0175-9 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Smith, P. M., Cawley, C., Williams, A., & Mustard, C. (2020) · The Journals of Gerontology: Series B · doi:10.1093/geronb/gbz026 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
A pilot examination of the impact of cancer patients' fatigue on their spousal caregivers
Passik, S. D., & Kirsh, K. L. (2005) · Palliative & Supportive Care · doi:10.1017/s1478951505050431 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Assessment of Caregivers’ Burden When Caring for Patients With Pancreatic and Periampullary Cancer
Fong, Z. V., Teinor, J. A., Yeo, T. P., Rinaldi, D., Greer, J. B., Lavu, H., Qadan, M., Johnston, F. M., Ferrone, C. R., Chang, D. C., et al. (2022) · JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/djac153 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Socioeconomic Burden of Ovarian Cancer in 11 Countries
Hutchinson, B., Euripides, M., Reid, F., Allman, G., Morrell, L., Spencer, G., Ilbawi, A., Meheus, F., Gaafar, H., & Casolino, R. (2025) · JCO Global Oncology · doi:10.1200/go-24-00313 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Self-citationTime away from work: employed husbands of women treated for breast cancer
Bradley, C. J., & Dahman, B. A. (2013) · Journal of Cancer Survivorship · doi:10.1007/s11764-012-0263-5 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Exploring Gender Differences in Self-Reported Physical Activity and Health Among Older Caregivers
Cuthbert, C., King-Shier, K., Tapp, D., Ruether, D., & Culos-Reed, S. (2017) · Oncology Nursing Forum · doi:10.1188/17.onf.435-445 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Chiu, K., MacEwan, J. P., May, S. G., Bognar, K., Peneva, D., Zhao, L. M., Yong, C., Amin, S., Bolinder, B., Batt, K., et al. (2022) · MDM Policy & Practice · doi:10.1177/23814683221113846 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Health and Work in the Family: Evidence from Spouses' Cancer DiagnosesPreprint
Jeon, S., & Pohl, V. (2016) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2733735 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Manne, S. L., Siegel, S. D., Heckman, C. J., & Kashy, D. A. (2015) · Psycho-Oncology · doi:10.1002/pon.3767 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Litzelman, K., Han, X., Zhao, J., et al. (2023) · Cancer · doi:10.1002/cncr.35070 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Gao, L., Das, N., Mudiyanselage, S. B., Winter, N., Cowdery, S., White, V., & Livingston, P. M. (2026) · Cancer Medicine · doi:10.1002/cam4.71657 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Indirect costs associated with metastatic breast cancer.
Wan, Y., Gao, X. Y., Mehta, S., et al. (2012) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2012.30.27_suppl.74 · Cited by 2
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- Hunt GG, Longacre ML, Kent EE, et al: “Cancer Caregiving in the U.S.” National Alliance for Caregiving. National Cancer Institute, 2016. https://www.caregiving.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/CancerCaregivingReport_FINAL_June-17-2016.pdf
- World Ovarian Cancer Coalition: Every Woman Study 2024. Toronto, Canada, World Ovarian Cancer Coalition. https://worldovariancancercoalition.org/our-work/ewslmic/
- International Agency for Research on Cancer: Cancer Tomorrow: Predictions of the future cancer incidence and mortality burden worldwide. Lyon, France, International Agency for Research on Cancer. https://gco.iarc.fr/tomorrow/
- Gleser LJ, Olkin I: Stochastically dependent effect sizes, in Cooper H, Hedges LV, Valentine JC (eds): The handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis (ed 2), Manhattan, NY, Russell Sage Foundation, 2009, pp 357-376
- Higgins JPT, Thomas J, Chandler J, et al (eds): Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions version 6.5 (updated August 2024). Cochrane, 2024. www.cochrane.org/handbook
- Authors
- Allman, G., Morrell, L., Meheus, F., Ilbawi, A., Soerjomataram, I., MacKay, C., Reid, F., & Euripides, M.
- Affiliations
- Independent Researcher
- Performance, Financing, and Delivery Department, WHO, Geneva, Switzerland
- Noncommunicable Disease and Mental Health Department, WHO, Geneva, Switzerland
- Centre international de recherche sur le cancer (FR)
- World Ovarian Cancer Coalition, Toronto, Canada
- ORCID
- Venue
- JCO Global Oncology
- Published
- 2026-10
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- e2600129-e2600129
- ISSN
- 2687-8941 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W7220845850
- Semantic Scholar
- b73453983454dbab53d8fce77158779554b0dc0e
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 28
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- JCO Global Oncology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (acceptedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Nursing care and research
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
- Keywords
- informal caregivers, cancer caregiving, working time reduction, absenteeism, job responsibilities, job loss, advanced cancer, palliative care, gender differences, caregiver well-being
- MeSH terms
- Efficiency, Employment, Humans, Neoplasms, Caregivers, Cost of Illness
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-14.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-14.
Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review