Cited by 0Nursing care and researchEconomic and Financial Impacts of CancerCancer survivorship and care

Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses of Time-Use, Productivity, and Labor Outcomes Among Unpaid Cancer Caregivers

Open access
Allman, Gavin, Morrell, Lillian, Meheus, Filip, Ilbawi, Andre, Soerjomataram, Isabelle, MacKay, Clara, Reid, Frances, Euripides, Mikis·2026·JCO Global Oncology

Abstract

PURPOSE: Unpaid caregivers provide essential support for people with cancer, yet the economic burden of this labor is not well quantified. This study provides pooled estimates of caregiving time and productivity outcomes to better understand the impact of unpaid caregiving on caregivers' economic well-being. METHODS: We systematically searched PubMed and EBSCO databases in June 2025 for peer-reviewed studies reporting primary or secondary data on six prespecified caregiver outcomes related to labor and time-use. Eligible studies focused on adult cancer care and included precision measures. After screening 3,904 records and reviewing 106 full-text articles, 59 studies from 16 countries were included in the meta-analyses. Where required for comparability, outcomes were standardized to a 35-hour work week and 250 workdays per year. RESULTS: Caregivers provided an estimated 45 hours of unpaid care each week (95% CI, 31 to 58). Among employed caregivers, working hours declined by 13% (95% CI, 9 to 18). Caregivers were absent for 5% of working days (95% CI, 4 to 6) and experienced a 24% loss in workplace productivity (95% CI, 20 to 28). In addition, 30% reported reduced job responsibilities (95% CI, 24 to 37) and 1% exited employment (95% CI, –3 to 5). Burdens were greater among caregivers of people with advanced cancer and during palliative care. Women consistently reported greater labor and productivity impacts than men. CONCLUSION: Unpaid caregivers of people with cancer face substantial time- and labor-related burdens that may affect their financial stability and long-term well-being. These findings highlight the need for supportive polices and workplace practices that protect caregiver well-being and economic security throughout the cancer care continuum. They also offer essential evidence to inform policies and interventions that protect caregiver well-being, economic stability, and long-term participation in the workforce.

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

This systematic review and meta-analysis pooled 59 studies from 16 countries to estimate unpaid cancer caregivers’ time-use, productivity, and labor outcomes. It found caregivers provide about 45 unpaid hours per week, with employed caregivers showing substantial absenteeism, presenteeism, reduced work hours, and professional role reductions, especially in advanced/palliative care and among women.

Key findings

  • Pooled unpaid caregiving time was 44.7 hours per week (95% CI, 30.9 to 58.4; 35 studies, 59 data points); the abstract rounds this to 45 hours (95% CI, 31 to 58). Care hours were higher for advanced cancer (64.4 hours [95% CI, 37.9 to 90.9]) than early/intermediate-stage disease (33.0 hours [95% CI, 26.5 to 39.5]).
  • Among employed caregivers, reduced working hours were 13.5% (95% CI, 8.7 to 18.3; 9 studies), absenteeism was 5.0% of workdays (95% CI, 4.1 to 5.8; 15 studies), presenteeism was 24.3% (95% CI, 20.4 to 28.2; 12 studies), and professional role reduction was 30.2% (95% CI, 23.8 to 36.6; 5 studies).
  • Change in employment was infrequently reported (3 studies); the text’s pooled estimate was -1.1% (95% CI, -4.8 to 2.5), indicating uncertainty whether job loss outweighs employment gain. The abstract reports 1% exited employment (95% CI, -3 to 5), and Table 1 reports 1.1% (95% CI, -2.6 to 4.8).
  • Burdens were greater among caregivers of people with advanced cancer and during palliative care. Women consistently reported greater labor and productivity impacts than men; the median study sample was 60.8% women, and seven studies disaggregated outcomes by caregiver sex.

Methods

  • Systematic search of PubMed and EBSCO on June 9, 2025, following PRISMA 2020; 3,904 records were screened, 106 full-text articles reviewed, and 59 studies from 16 countries met criteria for meta-analysis. Eligible studies reported primary or secondary data on six prespecified caregiver outcomes; cost-of-illness modeling studies, paid caregivers, and caregivers for youth/adolescents were excluded.
  • Outcomes were harmonized where needed to a 35-hour workweek and 250 workdays per year. Multiple related effect sizes within a study were collapsed into a single study-level estimate using inverse-variance weighting; precision measures were derived when not reported. Quality/risk of bias was assessed with a structured MetaQAT-based tool.
  • Random-effects inverse-variance meta-analyses were conducted in Stata 19, with DerSimonian-Laird tau² estimation. Continuous outcomes were pooled as means and binary/percentage outcomes as proportions, with 95% CIs; heterogeneity was assessed with tau², I², H², and Cochran’s Q. Prespecified subgroup analyses examined caregiver sex, cancer site, cancer stage, treatment phase, geographic region, and WHO region.

Limitations

  • The paper states high statistical heterogeneity for most pooled outcomes, varied measurement tools/reference periods/analytic approaches, and that standardized 35-hour workweeks and 250-day work years may not represent all regions. It also notes that collapsing multiple estimates may mask within-study variation, that individual-level determinants beyond sex were not systematically examined, and that the evidence base is skewed toward Western/high-income countries (only 8 of 59 studies outside Europe and North America; LMIC represented by China, Nigeria, Türkiye, and Uganda).
  • The paper states possible biases within component studies, including recall bias, survivorship bias, and response/recruitment bias; publication bias/small-study effects were identified for absenteeism (Egger test P < .001) and presenteeism (P = .0016), but not for unpaid caregiving hours (P = .8693).
  • Evident from the text: abstract, results text, and Table 1 report inconsistent employment-change estimates and rounding; no studies came from the Eastern Mediterranean or South-East Asian regions; only the Americas provided measurements of every outcome; some site-specific estimates relied on single studies; and sex-difference estimates had considerable CI overlap.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/go-26-00129

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

11 of 27 cited sources checked · 5 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured

  • Findingcitation

    One multisite US study reported variation in caregivers' professional role reduction by cancer site, with the highest rates among caregivers for hematologic (46%) and colorectal cancers (45%), and lower rates among those caring for patients with breast (36%) or prostate cancers (20%).

    “One multisite study in the United States reported variation in caregivers' professional role reduction by cancer site, with the highest rates among caregivers for hematologic (46%) and colorectal cancers (45%), and lower rates among those caring for patients with breast (36%) or prostate cancers (20%).21”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [21] source

      The Methods (Data sources and Analyses; page not provided) describe two US surveys and an analysis of caregivers’ employment changes by cancer site. The Results (Extended employment changes; page not provided) report overall rates of 25% and 29%, but our copy does not report the claimed hematologic, colorectal, breast, or prostate rates or establish their ranking. (LLM, conf=0.78)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Premisecitation

    Studies from LMIC and non-Western countries remain underrepresented in large databases like PubMed and EBSCO.

    “Although large databases like PubMed and EBSCO make efforts to index publications of diverse languages and geographic origins, studies from LMIC and non-Western countries remain underrepresented.35”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [35] source

      Section 2.2 reports that only 2.7% of Nigerian biomedical journals were indexed in PubMed/MEDLINE, supporting a narrower version of the underrepresentation claim. The paper’s broader findings concern African journals in Web of Science, Scopus, and CrossRef; the cited passages do not establish underrepresentation in EBSCO or the claimed indexing efforts by PubMed and EBSCO. (LLM, conf=0.86)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Findingown data

    The pooled estimate of unpaid caregiving time among unpaid cancer caregivers was 44.7 hours per week (95% CI, 30.9 to 58.4).

    “Caregivers provided an estimated 45 hours of unpaid care each week (95% CI, 31 to 58).”
    • Also stated in: § Weekly Hours of Unpaid Care · plain
      “The pooled estimate for unpaid caregiving time was 44.7 hours per week (95% CI, 30.9 to 58.4).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    Absenteeism was higher among caregivers of patients diagnosed at advanced stages (10.6%; 95% CI, 6.4 to 14.9) than among caregivers of patients with intermediate (5.0%; 95% CI, 3.8 to 6.3) or early-stage cancers (2%; 95% CI, 2.0 to 2.0).

    “Absenteeism was higher among caregivers of patients diagnosed at advanced stages (10.6%[95% CI, 6.4 to 14.9]) compared with intermediate (5.0% [95% CI, 3.8 to 6.3]) and early-stage cancers (2% [95% CI, 2.0 to 2.0]).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    Among employed caregivers, the pooled rate of reduced working hours was 13.5% (95% CI, 8.7 to 18.3).

    “Among employed caregivers, working hours declined by 13% (95% CI, 9 to 18).”
    • Also stated in: § Reduced Working Hours · plain
      “The pooled rate of reduced working hours among employed caregivers was 13.5% (95% CI, 8.7 to 18.3), with very high heterogeneity (I 2 > 98%).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 27
  • May combine two claims. 43
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Kamal et al show that employed caregivers reduce working hours and experience other forms of productivity loss.

    “Meanwhile, Kamal et al 7 show that employed caregivers reduce working hours and experience other forms of productivity loss.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Hutchinson et al estimated across 11 counties that patients with ovarian cancer receive an average of 800 hours of unpaid care per year.

    “Hutchinson et al 6 estimated across 11 counties that patients with ovarian cancer receive an average of 800 hours of unpaid care per year.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    A Canadian labor market study found that female caregivers were 73% more likely than men to leave the labor force and five times more likely to reduce working hours.

    “A Canadian labor market study found that female caregivers were 73% more likely than men to leave the labor force and five times more likely to reduce working hours.5”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [5] source

      The Abstract Results report that, after adjustment for labor-market roles, women were 73% more likely than men to leave the labor market and more than five times more likely to work part-time due to informal care. The fivefold figure applies specifically to working part-time, not to every form of reduced working hours. (LLM, conf=0.85)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    Female caregivers consistently reported higher caregiving time and greater adverse labor and productivity outcomes, including absenteeism, presenteeism, reduced working hours, job loss, and weekly hours of unpaid care, than male caregivers.

    “Women consistently reported greater labor and productivity impacts than men.”
    • Also stated in: § Differences in Labor and Productivity Outcomes by Sex · plain
      “Seven studies disaggregated outcomes by caregiver sex, with female caregivers consistently reporting higher caregiving time and greater adverse labor and productivity outcomes including absenteeism, presenteeism, reduced working hours, job loss, and weekly hours of unpaid care.20,[22][23][24][25][26][27]”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [20] source

      The regression results report larger relative earnings losses for women (5.9%) than men (3.4%), but similar employment reductions of about 2.4 percentage points. The Discussion also describes the gender difference as only slight. Our copy does not establish the claimed differences in caregiving time, absenteeism, presenteeism, job loss, or unpaid-care hours. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [22] source

      The Results and Discussion (page not provided) report a significant reduction in employment among wives of cancer survivors, but no significant employment effect among husbands. They do not establish that women consistently experienced greater impacts: other employment outcomes for wives were not significantly worse, and the study did not measure absenteeism, presenteeism, or unpaid caregiving time. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [23] source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Research on the economic burden of cancer caregiving remains limited and concentrated in high-income, Western countries.

    “Despite increasing attention, research on the economic burden of cancer caregiving remains limited and concentrated in high-income, Western countries.7”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [7] source

      The ‘Effect of Cancer Treatments on Caregiver Work Productivity’ section reports that 16 of 62 reviewed studies evaluated caregiver productivity, supporting a limited evidence base for that aspect of caregiving costs. ‘Overall Study Characteristics’ lists countries for the review as a whole, including several outside the West, but does not establish that caregiver-specific economic-burden research was concentrated in high-income Western countries. The review is also limited to treatment-related work productivity rather than the full economic burden of caregiving; page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.82)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    Evidence in LMIC is sparse, and estimates from lower-income settings may understate severity because diagnoses come later, survival is lower, caregiving durations are shorter, and weak data systems preclude long-term follow-up.

    “Evidence there is sparse, and estimates from lower-income settings may understate severity because diagnoses come later, survival is lower, caregiving durations are shorter, and weak data systems preclude long-term follow-up.29”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductreasoning

    All authors codeveloped a structured risk-of-bias and quality assessment based on the MetaQAT framework to evaluate relevance, reliability, applicability, and validity.

    “Because included studies used diverse observational designs, all authors codeveloped a structured risk-of-bias and quality assessment based on the MetaQAT framework to evaluate relevance, reliability, applicability, and validity.13”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductcitation

    The review followed PRISMA 2020 guidelines.

    “We followed guidelines from the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (2020).10”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The pooled estimate for change in employment status was -1.1% (95% CI, -4.8 to 2.5), indicating uncertainty whether caregiver job loss outweighs employment gain.

    “and 1% exited employment (95% CI, -3 to 5).”
    • Also stated in: § Change in Employment Status (job loss) · hedged
      “The over pooled estimate was -1.1% (95% CI, -4.8 to 2.5), indicating uncertainty whether caregiver job loss outweighs employment gain.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    Studies conducted in Europe estimate that weekly hours of care, reduced work hours, and rates of absenteeism are higher than those found in the Americas.

    “Studies conducted in Europe estimate that weekly hours of care, reduced work hours, and rates of absenteeism are higher than those found in the Americas.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning

    Caregivers in the Americas demonstrate lower absenteeism and higher presenteeism than counterparts in other regions.

    “Caregivers in the Americas demonstrate lower absenteeism and higher presenteeism than counterparts in other regions, possibly because of a lack of supportive labor laws and workplace policies for caregiving.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Sample sizes were generally robust; excluding comparison groups, only six studies reported outcomes based on samples of fewer than 50 individuals.

    “Sample sizes were generally robust; excluding comparison groups, only six studies reported outcomes based on samples of fewer than 50 individuals.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Empirical methods to measure bias were infrequently applied, with the most common approach being comparison of survey respondents and nonrespondents.

    “Empirical methods to measure bias were infrequently applied, with the most common approach being comparison of survey respondents and nonrespondents.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Presenteeism and weekly hours of unpaid care reach their highest levels during palliative care.

    “Presenteeism and weekly hours of unpaid care also reach their highest levels during palliative care.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Basic sample demographics were reported by 95% of studies, although some patient surveys of unpaid care utilization did not report caregiver age or sex.

    “Basic sample demographics were reported by 95% of studies, although some patient surveys of unpaid care utilization did not report caregiver age or sex.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    Absenteeism follows a similar trajectory to reduced work hours, but returns to peak levels during palliative care.

    “Absenteeism follows a similar trajectory, but instead returns to peak levels during palliative care.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Objective measures of caregiver burden, such as hours of care or task lists, were reported in 71% of studies, while subjective measures of caregiver burden, stress, or support were featured in 56%.

    “Objective measures of caregiver burden, such as hours of care or task lists, were reported in 71% of studies, while subjective measures of caregiver burden, stress, or support were featured in 56%.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning

    High statistical heterogeneity was observed for most pooled outcomes, limiting comparability of results across cancer sites and global regions.

    “High statistical heterogeneity was observed for most pooled outcomes, limiting comparability of results across cancer sites and global regions.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Only care hours were reported across all four remaining regions, and no region other than the Americas provided measurements of every outcome.

    “Only care hours were reported across all four remaining regions, and no region other than the Americas provided measurements of every outcome.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Many studies described potential sources of sample and response bias, although 5 (12%) did not report such limitations when applicable.

    “Many studies described potential sources of sample and response bias, although 5 (12%) did not report such limitations when applicable.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Findingnone given

    All secondary data sources were assessed as authoritative and reliable.

    “All secondary data sources were assessed as authoritative and reliable.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    Most employed caregivers remain in the workforce, but they exhibit increased absenteeism, reduced workplace productivity, and in some cases, decreased professional responsibilities.

    “Although most employed caregivers remain in the workforce, they exhibit increased absenteeism, reduced workplace productivity, and in some cases, decreased professional responsibilities.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    Just over half (52.5%) of included studies reported cancer site-specific outcome measures.

    “Just over half (52.5%) of included studies reported cancer site-specific outcome measures.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    Measurement tools, reference periods, and analytic approaches varied widely across studies, as do contextual factors like cultural norms, availability of formal care services, and labor market structures.

    “Measurement tools, reference periods, and analytic approaches varied widely across studies, as do contextual factors like cultural norms, availability of formal care services, and labor market structures.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning

    Some site-specific estimates relied on single studies, limiting comparability because of heterogeneous study designs, samples, and measurement approaches.

    “Some site-specific estimates relied on single studies, limiting comparability because of heterogeneous study designs, samples, and measurement approaches.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    Every study was determined to have applied appropriate statistical methods and reported effect estimates with associated measures of uncertainty.

    “Every study was determined to have applied appropriate statistical methods and reported effect estimates with associated measures of uncertainty.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    Care hours and rates of professional role reduction in the Americas are comparable with the Western Pacific.

    “At the same time, care hours and rates of professional role reduction in the Americas are comparable with the Western Pacific.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    Prospective methods were applied in 34% of studies, 22% used authoritative secondary data sources, and four-fifths of primary studies used validated instruments.

    “Prospective methods were applied in 34% of studies, 22% used authoritative secondary data sources, and four-fifths of primary studies used validated instruments.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The 59 articles included in this systematic review perform well on the abbreviated quality assessment, with the average study fulfilling 12.5 of the 15 criteria.

    “The 59 articles included in this systematic review perform well on the abbreviated quality assessment, with the average study fulfilling 12.5 of the 15 criteria.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Reduced working hours varied across cancer types, with pooled rates highest for lung cancer (23.0%; 95% CI, -7.7 to 53.8) and blood cancer (17.1%; 95% CI, -16.8 to 51.1) and lowest for breast cancer (7.6%; 95% CI, 1.9 to 13.3).

    “Reduced working hours varied across cancer types, although subgroup estimates were imprecise because of small sample sizes.Pooled rates were the highest for lung cancer (23.0%[95% CI, -7.7 to 53.8]) and blood cancer (17.1% [95% CI, -16.8 to 51.1]) caregivers and the lowest for breast cancer caregivers (7.6% [95% CI, 1.9 to 13.3]).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Only eight of the 59 included studies originate from outside of Europe and North America, with China, Nigeria, Türkiye, and Uganda being the only LMIC represented.

    “Only eight of the 59 included studies originate from outside of Europe and North America, with China, Nigeria, T ¨ urkiye, and Uganda being the only LMIC represented.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Evidence of small-study effects was identified for absenteeism (Egger test P < .001) and presenteeism (P 5 .0016), suggesting possible funnel-plot asymmetry for these outcomes.

    “Evidence of smallstudy effects was identified for absenteeism (Egger test P < .001)and presenteeism (P 5 .0016),suggesting possible funnel-plot asymmetry for these outcomes.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingnone given

    Most studies did not specify cancer type or report results for multiple cancer sites.

    “Most studies did not specify cancer type or report results for multiple cancer sites.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    60% of new cancer cases occur in LMICs.

    “As 60% of new cancer cases occur LMIC, there is a critical need for broader evidence that captures caregiver burden across diverse health systems, labor markets, and geographic contexts.9”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [9]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    Unpaid caregivers of people with cancer face substantial time- and labor-related burdens that may affect their financial stability and long-term wellbeing.

    “Unpaid caregivers of people with cancer face substantial time-and laborrelated burdens that may affect their financial stability and long-term wellbeing.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The International Labor Organization estimated in 2018 that women perform 76.2% of unpaid care work worldwide.

    “The International Labor Organization estimated in 2018 that women perform 76.2% of unpaid care work worldwide, which can restrict their access to economic opportunities and reinforce existing inequities.4”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [4]

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    The study protocol was not prospectively registered in any database.

    “The study protocol was not prospectively registered in any database.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Unpaid care hours in the United States are highest for lung cancer, ovarian cancer, and non-Hodgkin lymphoma caregivers, and lowest for breast cancer caregivers.

    “Yabroff and Kim 2 reported that unpaid care hours in the United States are highest for lung cancer, ovarian cancer, and non-Hodgkin lymphoma caregivers, and lowest for breast cancer caregivers.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Yabroff and Kim 2

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    Two authors independently screened abstracts and conducted full-text review.

    “Two authors (G.A., L.M.) independently screened abstracts and subsequently conducted full-text review of 106 articles, including seven systematic reviews.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    To avoid overweighting these studies, we applied a consistent inverse-variance collapsing procedure to derive a single study-level estimate before contributing results to the meta-analysis.

    “To avoid overweighting these studies, we applied a consistent inverse-variance collapsing procedure to derive a single study-level estimate before contributing results to the meta-analysis.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data

    Publication bias and small-study effects were assessed for outcomes with at least 10 independent study-level effect estimates.

    “Publication bias and small-study effects were assessed for outcomes with at least 10 independent study-level effect estimates.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Our findings should be interpreted cautiously in LMIC contexts where caregiving structures, labor markets, and social protections differ from the high-income settings of most studies.

    “Our findings should be interpreted cautiously in LMIC contexts where caregiving structures, labor markets, and social protections differ from the high-income settings of most studies.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Greater productivity loss is reported among caregivers supporting patients with advanced cancer, and absenteeism and presenteeism were correlated with care hours.

    “Mazanec et al 34 reported greater productivity loss among caregivers supporting patients with advanced cancer and demonstrated that absenteeism and presenteeism were correlated with care hours.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Mazanec et al 34

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Study design and conductnone given

    Standardized 35-hour workweeks and 250-day work years may not be representative of labor customs in all regions.

    “Furthermore, standardized 35-hour workweeks and 250-day work years may not be representative of labor customs in all regions.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    US caregivers for breast cancer reduce fewer working hours than caregivers for lung cancer, but exhibit greater presenteeism.

    “Finally, Chiu et al 28 found that US caregivers for breast cancer reduce fewer working hours than caregivers for lung cancer, but exhibit greater presenteeism.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Chiu et al 28

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Higher presenteeism is found among working caregivers with white-collar jobs and college degrees.

    “For example, Keita Fakeye et al 33 find higher presenteeism among working caregivers with white-collar jobs and college degrees.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Keita Fakeye et al 33

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    Prespecified subgroup analyses were conducted when sufficient data were available.

    “Prespecified subgroup analyses were conducted when sufficient data were available.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Gendered social expectations and cultural norms surrounding work, family, and caregiving likely contribute to the observed sex-based differences.

    “Gendered social expectations and cultural norms surrounding work, family, and caregiving likely contribute to the observed sex-based differences.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    The pooled estimates consistently illustrate more severe labor consequences for women compared with men, but these results should be interpreted cautiously.

    “Although the pooled estimates consistently illustrate more severe labor consequences for women compared with men, these results should be interpreted cautiously because of”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Findings of gender-based disparities in labor and productivity outcomes are consistent with evidence from the International Labor Organization and other research groups.

    “Findings of gender-based disparities in labor and productivity outcomes are consistent with evidence from the International Labor Organization and other research groups.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    It is possible that the aggregated results of this meta-analysis reflect biases within its component studies.

    “Finally, it is possible that the aggregated results of this meta-analysis reflect biases within its component studies.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Female caregivers in the United States have higher absenteeism and presenteeism rates than their male counterparts, although men in the study sample contributed marginally higher care hours.

    “Finally, Fong et al 24 conclude that female caregivers in the United States boast higher absenteeism and presenteeism rates than their male counterparts, although they also find marginally higher care hours contributed by men in their study sample.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Fong et al 24

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisereasoning

    Comparable registries of caregivers are rare.

    “Although research on cancer patients can identify and anonymize research subjects in databases of electronic medical records or insurance claims, comparable registries of caregivers are rare.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    Funnel plots were constructed to assess publication bias and small-study effects for outcomes with at least 10 independent study-level estimates.

    “Funnel plots, included in the Data Supplement, were also constructed to assess publication bias and small-study effects for outcomes with at least 10 independent study-level estimates.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Narrow CIs for European and American outcome estimates reflect the strong depth of research in these geographies, while estimates from other regions represent comparatively fewer studies and greater uncertainty.

    “Narrow CIs for European and American outcome estimates reflect the strong depth of research in these geographies, while estimates from other regions represent comparatively fewer studies and greater uncertainty.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Pooled findings from high-income Western studies may not hold true in lower-income and non-Western settings.
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Caregiving husbands in the United States make smaller reductions in their work hours, and provide fewer care hours, than caregiving wives.

    “Hollenbeak et al 22 find that caregiving husbands in the United States make smaller reductions in their work hours, and provide fewer care hours, than caregiving wives.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Hollenbeak et al 22

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    Comprehensive regional comparisons are precluded by the evidence base's skew toward high-income, Western countries, with evidence gaps persisting for certain outcome measures across geographic contexts.

    “Comprehensive regional comparisons are precluded by the evidence base's skew toward high-income, Western countries, with evidence gaps persisting for certain outcome measures across geographic contexts.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Pooled findings from high-income Western studies may not hold true in lower-income and non-Western settings.
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    Although this method ensured comparability across studies and prevented disproportionate influence from any single source, it may mask important within-study variation across phases of care or patient subgroups.

    “Although this method ensured comparability across studies and prevented disproportionate influence from any single source, it may mask important within-study variation across phases of care or patient subgroups.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    Random-effects models were chosen in advance to account for heterogeneity in study designs, populations, and measurement approaches.

    “Random-effects models were chosen in advance to account for heterogeneity in study designs, populations, and measurement approaches”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    Recruitment through clinics or patients overrepresents highly engaged caregivers, while recruitment through support groups emphasizes high-burden and care-seeking individuals, and online surveys lean toward younger and higher-income demographics.

    “Recruitment through clinics or patients overrepresents highly engaged caregivers, while recruitment through support groups emphasizes high-burden and care-seeking individuals, and online surveys lean toward younger and higher-income demographics.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    The associated productivity loss represents a broader social cost and contributes meaningfully to the overall socioeconomic burden of cancer.

    “Although the burden of caregiving is felt most acutely at the individual and household levels, this review suggests that the associated productivity loss represents a broader social cost and contributes meaningfully to the overall socioeconomic burden of cancer.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    Cancer treatment strains patients financially, and this burden compounds when a caregiving family member must reduce or forgo employment.

    “Cancer treatment strains patients financially, and this burden compounds when a caregiving family member must reduce or forgo employment.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    As life expectancy and the burden of noncommunicable diseases rise, unpaid caregiving becomes increasingly integral to health care systems worldwide.

    “In conclusion, as life expectancy and the burden of noncommunicable diseases rise, unpaid caregiving becomes increasingly integral to health care systems worldwide.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    These impacts are unevenly distributed, with women providing more unpaid care and experiencing greater economic and professional consequences than men.

    “These impacts are unevenly distributed, with women providing more unpaid care and experiencing greater economic and professional consequences than men.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
64 of 64
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Unpaid care may be more central to cancer care and recovery in lower-income and non-Western settings than in high-income Western settings.

    “where unpaid care may be even more central to cancer care and recovery”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Pooled findings from high-income Western studies may not hold true in lower-income and non-Western settings.

    “pooled findings may not hold true in lower-income and non-Western settings”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Time and productivity costs incurred by caregivers are overlooked by routine health expenditure reporting.

    “Time and productivity costs incurred by caregivers are overlooked by routine health expenditure reporting.”
3 of 3

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Pooled employment-change estimate has opposite signs

    Major

    The results text reports a pooled change of -1.1%, whereas Table 1 reports +1.1%. This reverses the direction of the point estimate under the text's stated convention that negative values represent job loss.

  • A reported study contradicts the claim of consistently higher care time for women

    Minor

    The sex-disaggregated results say female caregivers consistently reported higher caregiving time, but the same section says one study found marginally higher care hours among men.

  • Screened-record count differs from the PRISMA figure

    Minor

    The text says 3,904 records were screened, but the PRISMA figure reports 3,902.

3 of 3

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Hunt GG, Longacre ML, Kent EE, et al: “Cancer Caregiving in the U.S.” National Alliance for Caregiving. National Cancer Institute, 2016. https://www.caregiving.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/CancerCaregivingReport_FINAL_June-17-2016.pdf
  2. World Ovarian Cancer Coalition: Every Woman Study 2024. Toronto, Canada, World Ovarian Cancer Coalition. https://worldovariancancercoalition.org/our-work/ewslmic/
  3. International Agency for Research on Cancer: Cancer Tomorrow: Predictions of the future cancer incidence and mortality burden worldwide. Lyon, France, International Agency for Research on Cancer. https://gco.iarc.fr/tomorrow/
  4. Gleser LJ, Olkin I: Stochastically dependent effect sizes, in Cooper H, Hedges LV, Valentine JC (eds): The handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis (ed 2), Manhattan, NY, Russell Sage Foundation, 2009, pp 357-376
  5. Higgins JPT, Thomas J, Chandler J, et al (eds): Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions version 6.5 (updated August 2024). Cochrane, 2024. www.cochrane.org/handbook

Authors
Allman, G., Morrell, L., Meheus, F., Ilbawi, A., Soerjomataram, I., MacKay, C., Reid, F., & Euripides, M.
Affiliations
  • Independent Researcher
  • Performance, Financing, and Delivery Department, WHO, Geneva, Switzerland
  • Noncommunicable Disease and Mental Health Department, WHO, Geneva, Switzerland
  • Centre international de recherche sur le cancer (FR)
  • World Ovarian Cancer Coalition, Toronto, Canada
Venue
JCO Global Oncology
Published
2026-10
Volume
12
Issue
10
Pages
e2600129-e2600129
ISSN
2687-8941 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W7220845850
Cited by
0
References
28
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • JCO Global Oncology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (acceptedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Nursing care and research
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
Keywords
informal caregivers, cancer caregiving, working time reduction, absenteeism, job responsibilities, job loss, advanced cancer, palliative care, gender differences, caregiver well-being
MeSH terms
Efficiency, Employment, Humans, Neoplasms, Caregivers, Cost of Illness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-14.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-14.

Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review