Cited by 18Cancer survivorship and careDigital Mental Health InterventionsMobile Health and mHealth Applications

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Development and usability testing of a web-based psychosocial intervention for women living with metastatic breast cancer: Finding My Way-Advanced

Open access
Beatty, Lisa, Koczwara, Bogda, Butow, Phyllis, Turner, Jane, Girgis, Afaf, Schofield, Penelope, Hulbert-Williams, Nicholas J., Kaambwa, Billingsley, Kemp, Emma·2021·Journal of Cancer Survivorship

Abstract

Purpose Women living with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) face significant distress and unmet needs, yet few resources have been developed for this population. The current study aimed to develop and evaluate the usability of Finding My Way-Advanced (FMW-A), a web-based self-guided psychosocial program for women with MBC.Methods FMW-A was co-designed through (a) adapting an efficacious online program for people with curatively treated cancer and (b) receiving iterative rounds of input and feedback from a multidisciplinary co-design team including consumers, clinicians, and academics. A think-aloud protocol was then implemented to test the usability of the resulting 6-module prototype, with women living with MBC accessing up to three modules with an interviewer sitting along-side. Participants were recruited until saturation of themes occurred. Data were analysed thematically.Results Participants (n=8) were, on average, 65.3 years old, mostly partnered (n=5), retired (n=6), post-secondary school educated (n=6), and with non-dependent children (n=7). Feedback fell into 6 themes. Positive feedback about FMW-A summarised the supportive and informative nature of the program, supplemented by comments about broadly relatable content. However, one size clearly did not fit all: within themes, diverging experiences emerged regarding navigability, worksheets, and layout. Participants noted that having/making time for the intervention would be important to program engagement.Conclusions Usability testing indicated participants found content helpful and relatable, and identified significant pragmatic improvements to be made prior to further testing.Implications for cancer survivors The development of FMW-A represents an important step in providing acceptable resources to support women living with MBC.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11764-021-01019-5

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • This finding aligns with previous research and emphasizes the importance of building flexibility into digital programs targeting cancer survivors, in terms of tailoring and frequency/timing of use, to ensure uptake.

    “This finding aligns with previous research [66,72,76,77] and emphasizes the importance of building flexibility into digital programs targeting cancer survivors, not only in terms of tailoring but also in terms of frequency and timing of use, to ensure its uptake by target users.”

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Beatty, L., Koczwara, B., Butow, P., Turner, J., Girgis, A., Schofield, P., Hulbert-Williams, N. J., Kaambwa, B., & Kemp, E.
Affiliations
  • Flinders University (AU)
  • The University of Sydney (AU)
  • The University of Queensland (AU)
  • UNSW Sydney (AU)
  • Swinburne University of Technology (AU)
Corresponding author
Beatty, Lisa
Venue
Journal of Cancer Survivorship
Published
2021-03-15
Volume
15
Issue
3
Pages
403-409
ISSN
  • 1932-2259 (ISSN-L)
  • 1932-2267
OpenAlex
W3136594253
Cited by
18
References
8
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3
FWCI
1.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Cancer Survivorship (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ChesterRep (University of Chester) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Edge Hill University Research Information Repository (Edge Hill University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Beat Cancer Project (1140482)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
Keywords
metastatic breast cancer, usability testing, co-design, cancer survivorship, women with cancer, program engagement, think-aloud
MeSH terms
Internet-Based Intervention, Psychosocial Intervention, User-Centered Design, Aged, Breast Neoplasms, Child, Female, Humans, User-Computer Interface

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review