Why do farmers prefer oil palm? Lessons learnt from Bungo District, Indonesia
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
State-sponsored land reform settlers, often with mixed-farming backgrounds, are typically brought to forest frontiers without viable economic alternatives but to become part of commodity chains such as beef or palm oil.
“In this regard, it becomes meaningful that state-sponsored land reform settlersoften themselves with mixed-farming backgroundstypically are brought to forest frontiers without viable economic alternatives but to become part of commodity chains such as beef or palm oil (Russo Lopes and Bastos Lima, 2022; see also Feintrenie et al., 2010).”
From Beyond the “supply chain” framing: Cattle ranching as a vanishing mediator of deforestation and dispossession in the Brazilian and Colombian Amazon (2026) · cites this paper as Feintrenie et al., 2010
Locals are frequently absorbed to a limited degree in new economic activities partly as a co-optation strategy to placate resistance and win them over.
“Locals frequently are absorbed (to a limited degree) in the new economic activities partly as a co-optation strategy, to placate resistance and win them over (Feintrenie et al., 2010;McCarthy et al., 2012).”
From Beyond the “supply chain” framing: Cattle ranching as a vanishing mediator of deforestation and dispossession in the Brazilian and Colombian Amazon (2026) · cites this paper as Feintrenie et al., 2010
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Bastos Lima, M. G., & López, J. (2026) · World Development · doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2026.107532
- Authors
- Feintrenie, L., Chong, W. K., & Levang, P.
- Affiliations
- Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (FR)
- Institut Agro Montpellier (FR)
- Corresponding author
- Feintrenie, Laurène
- Venue
- Small-scale Forestry
- Published
- 2010-07-01
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 379-396
- ISSN
- 1873-7617 (ISSN-L)
- 1873-7854
- OpenAlex
- W2067712101
- Cited by
- 335
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 13 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 42 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 28 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 10
- FWCI
- 10.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Small-scale Forestry (publishedVersion)
- Agritrop (Cirad) (submittedVersion)
- CGSPace A Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (Consultative Group for International Agricultural Research) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Oil Palm Production and Sustainability
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agricultural Innovations and Practices
- Keywords
- oil palm, smallholder farmers, farmer preferences, livelihood impacts, joint ventures, land tenure conflicts, rubber, rice, Jambi
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review