The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Using video representations of teaching in practice-based professional development programs
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform
Shulman, L. (1987) · Harvard Educational Review · doi:10.17763/haer.57.1.j463w79r56455411 · Cited by 16,787
Redefining teaching, re-imagining teacher education
Grossman, P., Hammerness, K., & McDonald, M. (2009) · Teachers and Teaching · doi:10.1080/13540600902875340 · Cited by 1,759 · cited 2×
“tions, analyzing students’ correct and incorrect solution strategies, and eliciting further thinking (Grossman et al. 2009; Kazemi and Hubbard 2008).”
Background
Cited by
Teachers’ perceptions and uptake of professional development overtime
Koellner, K., Seago, N., Riske, A., Placa, N., & Carlson, D. (2024) · International Journal of Educational Research Open · doi:10.1016/j.ijedro.2023.100308 · Cited by 7
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Borko, H., Koellner, K., Jacobs, J., & Seago, N.
- Venue
- ZDM
- Published
- 2010-12-29
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 175-187
- ISSN
- 1615-679X (ISSN-L)
- 1863-9690
- 1863-9704
- OpenAlex
- W2048550362
- Cited by
- 233
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 16.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
