Cited by 216Science Education and PedagogyMathematics Education and Teaching TechniquesProblem and Project Based Learning

Implementation of inquiry-based learning in day-to-day teaching: a synthesis

Maaß, Katja, Artigue, Michèle·2013·ZDM

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11858-013-0528-0

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Maaß, K., & Artigue, M.
Affiliations
  • University of Education Freiburg (DE)
  • Laboratoire de Didactique André Revuz (FR)
Corresponding author
Maaß, Katja
Venue
ZDM
Published
2013-10-04
Volume
45
Issue
6
Pages
779-795
ISSN
  • 1615-679X (ISSN-L)
  • 1863-9690
  • 1863-9704
OpenAlex
W2036625619
Cited by
216
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 4
FWCI
55.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
ZDM (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Science Education and Pedagogy
  • Social Sciences › Education › Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques
  • Social Sciences › Education › Problem and Project Based Learning
Keywords
inquiry-based learning, educational implementation, dissemination of educational innovations, professional development, implementation strategies, conceptual framework, teaching materials, school context

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review