Cited by 736Educational Environments and Student OutcomesSchool Choice and PerformanceGlobal Educational Policies and Reforms

Creating Effective Teaching and Learning Environments: First Results from TALIS

Open access
OECD·2009·TALIS

Abstract

This publication is the first report from the OECD’s Teaching and Learning International Survey (TALIS). It provides quantitative, policy-relevant information on the teaching and learning environment in schools in 23 countries.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1787/9789264068780-en

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Informal dialogue to improve teaching is predominantly recognised as a central professional learning activity with a high teacher participation rate in the OECD (2009) report.

    “Considering that even in the OECD ( 2009) report (p.57), 'Informal dialogue to improve teaching' is predominantly recognised as a central professional learning activity with a high teacher participation rate, this raises an intriguing question.”

    From Unveiling teachers’ professional agency and decision-making in professional learning: the illusion of choice (2025) · cites this paper as OECD (2009)

    The available Introduction passage discusses teacher appraisal and feedback, but not informal dialogue as a professional learning activity or its participation rate. Searches for the quoted phrase and for teacher participation in informal dialogue found no passage addressing the claim; no passage from p. 57 was available. (LLM, conf=0.72)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
OECD
Corresponding author
OECD
Venue
TALIS
Publisher
OECD
Published
2009-07-21
ISSN
  • 2312-962X (ISSN-L)
  • 2312-9638
OpenAlex
W3175690966
Cited by
716
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 43 · 2024: 33 · 2023: 51 · 2022: 38 · 2021: 46 · 2020: 49 · 2019: 63 · 2018: 85 · 2017: 30 · 2016: 54 · 2015: 47 · 2014: 46 · 2013: 49 · 2012: 29
FWCI
29.78
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Teaching and learning international survey (publishedVersion)
  • CyberLeninK (CyberLeninka) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Digital Access to Libraries (Université catholique de Louvain (UCL), l'Université de Namur (UNamur) and the Université Saint-Louis (USL-B)) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Educational Environments and Student Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Education › School Choice and Performance
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Global Educational Policies and Reforms
Keywords
teaching and learning environment, school climate, teacher attitudes, student attitudes, school leadership, school facilities, teacher well-being, education policy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review