Cited by 45Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality ControlAcute Myocardial Infarction ResearchHeart Failure Treatment and Management

Biological and Analytical Variation of Clinical Biomarker Testing: Implications for Biomarker-guided Therapy

Wu, Alan H. B.·2013·Current Heart Failure Reports

Abstract

Testing for serum-based biomarkers are essential for diagnosis, risk stratification, and management of patients with cardiovascular disease. All biomarker assays have inherent analytical variability (coefficient of variance CVA), ranging from 5-20 %. There are also variances within a subject over time (CVI) and between subjects (CVG). Variances are determined by experimentation under controlled conditions on healthy subjects. Once measured, the index of individuality (II), reference change value (RCV), and number of samples to establish a homeostatic set point can be calculated. These attributes affect how results of biomarker tests are interpreted in routine clinical practice such as cardiac troponin for acute coronary syndromes, the natriuretic peptides, galectin-3 and sST2 for heart failure, lipids and lipoproteins for primary cardiovascular disease risk, and liver function tests and skeletal muscle biomarkers for detecting complications from statin use.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11897-013-0156-6

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wu, A. H. B.
Affiliations
San Francisco General Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
Wu, Alan H. B.
Venue
Current Heart Failure Reports
Published
2013-09-15
Volume
10
Issue
4
Pages
434-440
ISSN
  • 1546-9530 (ISSN-L)
  • 1546-9549
OpenAlex
W2071887213
Cited by
45
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 3
FWCI
0.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Current Heart Failure Reports (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Acute Myocardial Infarction Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Failure Treatment and Management
Keywords
serum biomarkers, analytical variability, within-person variability, between-subject variability, coefficient of variation, reference change value, index of individuality, homeostatic set point, cardiac troponin, acute coronary syndrome, natriuretic peptides, galectin-3, soluble ST2, heart failure, cardiovascular risk, statin-induced myopathy, liver function tests, biomarker-guided therapy
MeSH terms
Cardiovascular Diseases, Diagnostic Techniques, Cardiovascular, Diagnostic Tests, Routine, Humans, Reference Values, Troponin, Biomarkers, Drug Monitoring, Risk Assessment, Acute Coronary Syndrome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review