Cited by 97Obstructive Sleep Apnea ResearchBlood Pressure and Hypertension StudiesSleep and related disorders

Are sleep-related breathing disorders important contributing factors to the production of essential hypertension?

Silverberg, Donald S., Oksenberg, Arie·2001·Current Hypertension Reports

Abstract

About 50% of all patients with essential hypertension have obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), and another 40% of essential hypertension patients are habitual snorers, but without OSA. There is now convincing evidence that both OSA and habitual snoring are independent risk factors for essential hypertension, and that treatment of OSA will reduce the blood pressure. There is also some evidence that treatment of habitual snoring will also reduce the blood pressure. If this is the case, then we postulate a unifying hypothesis: that these two sleep-related breathing disorders (SRBD) (OSA and habitual snoring) are very common contributing factors to what is called "essential hypertension." The many epidemiologic, clinical, hematologic, biochemical, and physiologic findings seen in essential hypertension could also be due to the associated SRBD. A routine search for SRBD by asking a few simple questions of all patients (especially those with hypertension) and their bed partners could increase the number of patients detected and treated significantly. Successful treatment of SRBD would improve sleep quality and the associated excessive daytime sleepiness, and thus improve the quality of life. In addition, there is a good chance that the hypertension will improve as well.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11906-001-0040-8

Cites

60 of 60 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 61 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Silverberg, D. S., & Oksenberg, A.
Affiliations
Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center (IL)
Venue
Current Hypertension Reports
Published
2001-06
Volume
3
Issue
3
Pages
209-215
ISSN
  • 1522-6417 (ISSN-L)
  • 1534-3111
OpenAlex
W2055930891
Cited by
97
References
61
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
0.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Current Hypertension Reports (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
Keywords
essential hypertension, obstructive sleep apnea, habitual snoring, sleep-disordered breathing, hypertension risk factors, blood pressure reduction, OSA treatment, excessive daytime sleepiness, sleep quality
MeSH terms
Blood Pressure, Circadian Rhythm, Humans, Hypertension, Risk Factors, Sleep Apnea Syndromes, Snoring, Sleep Apnea, Obstructive

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review