Cited by 75Mobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsBlood Pressure and Hypertension StudiesTelemedicine and Telehealth Implementation

Smartphone Applications for Hypertension Management: a Potential Game-Changer That Needs More Control

Parati, Gianfranco, Torlasco, Camilla, Omboni, Stefano, Pellegrini, Dario·2017·Current Hypertension Reports

Abstract

Purpose of the review This review article will summarize available data on mobile applications for the management of hypertension, by highlighting their potential for clinical use, the current limitations and the yet pending issues to be addressed in future studies. Recent findings The number of available applications related to arterial hypertension and their usage by smartphone owners is constantly increasing. However, most applications lack standardization and scientific validation, and security flaws could be an important, yet still underrated, issue. Small studies showed that treatment strategies based on telemonitoring of home blood pressure with mobile applications could improve blood pressure control, but there are no data on strong outcomes and the high heterogeneity of available studies severely limits the possibility of reaching a definitive conclusion on the impact of such strategies. Smartphone applications for arterial hypertension represent a great chance to improve management of this condition. Results from small studies are promising, but there is a strong need for large, long-term, well-designed clinical trials, before these potential solutions might be reliably applied in real-life patients' care.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11906-017-0743-0

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Parati, G., Torlasco, C., Omboni, S., & Pellegrini, D.
Affiliations
  • IRCCS Istituto Auxologico Italiano (IT)
  • Italian Institute of Telemedicine (IT)
  • University of Milano-Bicocca (IT)
Corresponding author
Parati, Gianfranco
Venue
Current Hypertension Reports
Published
2017-05-13
Volume
19
Issue
6
Pages
48-48
ISSN
  • 1522-6417 (ISSN-L)
  • 1534-3111
OpenAlex
W2613206852
Cited by
75
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 2
FWCI
1.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Current Hypertension Reports (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • BOA (University of Milano-Bicocca) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
Keywords
antihypertensive therapy, mobile health apps, mobile application, home blood pressure monitoring, remote patient monitoring, blood pressure control, app validation, security vulnerabilities, digital health
MeSH terms
Smartphone, Blood Pressure, Blood Pressure Determination, Humans, Hypertension, Telemedicine, Mobile Applications

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review