Cited by 143Blood Pressure and Hypertension StudiesNon-Invasive Vital Sign MonitoringHemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Validation of the Somnotouch-NIBP noninvasive continuous blood pressure monitor according to the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol revision 2010

Open access
Bilo, Grzegorz, Zorzi, Cristina, Ochoa Munera, Juan E., Torlasco, Camilla, Giuli, Valentina, Parati, Gianfranco·2015·Blood Pressure Monitoring

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The present study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of the Somnotouch-NIBP noninvasive continuous blood pressure monitor according to the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol revision 2010. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Systolic and diastolic blood pressures were sequentially measured in 33 adults (11 women, mean age 63.5±11.9 years) using a mercury sphygmomanometer (two observers) and the Somnotouch-NIBP device (one supervisor). A total of 99 pairs of comparisons were obtained from 33 participants for judgments in two parts with three grading phases. RESULTS: All the validation requirements were fulfilled. The Somnotouch-NIBP device fulfilled the requirements of the part 1 of the validation study. The number of absolute differences between device and observers within 5, 10, and 15 mmHg was 75/99, 90/99, and 96/99, respectively, for systolic blood pressure and 90/99, 99/99, and 99/99, respectively, for diastolic blood pressure. The device also fulfilled the criteria in part 2 of the validation study. Twenty-seven and 31 participants had at least two of the three device-observers differences less than or equal to 5 mmHg for systolic and diastolic blood pressure, respectively. All three device-observer differences were greater than 5 mmHg in two participants for systolic and in one participant for diastolic blood pressure. CONCLUSION: The Somnotouch-NIBP noninvasive continuous blood pressure monitor has passed the requirements of the International Protocol revision 2010, and hence can be recommended for blood pressure monitoring in adults, at least under conditions corresponding to those investigated in our study.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/mbp.0000000000000124

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Fig. 1 Scatter plot of the systolic blood pressure differences between the Somnotouch-NIBP auscultatory method (y-axis) against the average of device and auscultatory pressure values (x-axis).
Fig. 1 Scatter plot of the systolic blood pressure differences between the Somnotouch-NIBP auscultatory method (y-axis) against the average of device and auscultatory pressure values (x-axis).CC BY-NC-ND · PubMed Central
Fig. 2 Scatter plot of the diastolic blood pressure differences between the Somnotouch-NIBP auscultatory method (y-axis) against the average of device and auscultatory pressure values (x-axis).
Fig. 2 Scatter plot of the diastolic blood pressure differences between the Somnotouch-NIBP auscultatory method (y-axis) against the average of device and auscultatory pressure values (x-axis).CC BY-NC-ND · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 143

Metadata

Authors
Bilo, G., Zorzi, C., Ochoa Munera, J. E., Torlasco, C., Giuli, V., & Parati, G.
Affiliations
  • University of Milan (IT)
  • IRCCS Istituto Auxologico Italiano (IT)
Corresponding author
Parati, Gianfranco
Venue
Blood Pressure Monitoring
Published
2015-10
Volume
20
Issue
5
Pages
291-294
ISSN
1359-5237 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2096711200
Cited by
143
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 2
FWCI
6.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-nd
Locations
  • Blood Pressure Monitoring (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • BOA (University of Milano-Bicocca) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Istituto Auxologico Italiano
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy
Keywords
non-invasive blood pressure monitoring, device validation, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, measurement accuracy, mercury sphygmomanometer comparison, adults
MeSH terms
Aged, Anthropometry, Arm, Clinical Protocols, Diastole, Electrocardiography, Equipment Design, Female, Heart Rate, Humans, Hypertension, Male, Middle Aged, Plethysmography, Systole, Observer Variation, Blood Pressure Monitors, Blood Pressure Monitoring, Ambulatory, Disease Management, Pulse Wave Analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Validation of the Somnotouch-NIBP noninvasive continuous blood pressure monitor according to the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol revision 2010. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/mbp.0000000000000124
The paper
Bilo, G., Zorzi, C., Ochoa Munera, J. E., Torlasco, C., Giuli, V., & Parati, G. (2015). Validation of the Somnotouch-NIBP noninvasive continuous blood pressure monitor according to the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol revision 2010. Blood Pressure Monitoring. https://doi.org/10.1097/mbp.0000000000000124