CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 40Nursing care and researchCancer survivorship and careIntergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving

Inequities Among Cancer Caregivers with Diverse Identities: A Review of the Literature and Future Directions

Open access
Tan, Kelly R., Waters, Austin R., Chen, Qi, Hendricks, Bailey A., Coombs, Lorinda A., Kent, Erin E.·2023·Current Oncology Reports
DOI 10.1007/s11912-023-01415-3PMC PMC10091341
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Purpose of review The number of older adults with cancer relying on support from caregivers continues to increase. Health disparities in older adults with cancer often extend to their caregivers. This review aims to assess the state of cancer caregiving research in historically underrepresented diverse populations and provide recommendations for future research and policy. Recent findings Research on caregivers of older adults with cancer from diverse backgrounds has primarily been descriptive. Health disparities for historically underrepresented caregivers (LGBTQ + , BIPOC, rural, young adults, youth) exist across several dimensions (e.g., financial, mental, and physical health, and access to caregiver support). Few published studies have closely examined the unique experiences of these caregivers nor provided culturally appropriate tailored interventions. Health equity research within caregiving populations is in its infancy. Priorities for future work should focus on identifying modifiable targets for intervention, changing systems-level processes in acknowledging and supporting caregivers, and creating policies that reduce financial inequities of caregiving.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11912-023-01415-3

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A significant gap exists in understanding what same-sex partners undergo.

    “a significant gap exists in understanding what same-sex partners undergo”

    From Exploring the Unmet Needs of Cancer Caregivers in India: A Cross-Sectional Survey (2024) · cites this paper as [22]

  • Same-sex partners' coping mechanisms are the same as heterosexual couples, especially in a conservative society like India.

    “Their coping mechanisms are the same, especially in a more conservative society like India [22].”

    From Exploring the Unmet Needs of Cancer Caregivers in India: A Cross-Sectional Survey (2024) · cites this paper as [22]

    The Introduction’s LGBTQ+ community section says caregivers perform similar caregiving tasks, but it does not compare same-sex and heterosexual couples’ coping mechanisms. Searches for coping mechanisms and India found no passage addressing whether those mechanisms are the same, particularly in India. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 62 · Cited by 40

Research works printed but not linked: 57

  1. [1]Siegel RL Miller KD Fuchs HE Jemal A Cancer statistics, 2022 CA Cancer J Clin 2022 72 1 7 33 10.3322/caac.21708 35020204 · DOI · Paper page
  2. [4]•• Sun V, Puts M, Haase K, Pilleron S, Hannan M, Sattar S, et al. The role of family caregivers in the care of older adults with cancer.Semin Oncol Nurs. 2021;37(6):151232. 10.1016/j.soncn.2021.151232. This review provides a summary of the role of caregivers of older adults with cancer. 34753644 · DOI · Paper page
  3. [5]Kent EE Park EM Wood WA Bryant AL Mollica MA Survivorship care of older adults with cancer: priority areas for clinical practice, training, research, and policy J Clin Oncol 2021 39 19 2175 2184 10.1200/JCO.21.00226 34043450 PMC8260922 · DOI
  4. [6]Hsu T Loscalzo M Ramani R Forman S Popplewell L Clark K Factors associated with high burden in caregivers of older adults with cancer Cancer 2014 120 18 2927 2935 10.1002/cncr.28765 24898093 PMC4159406 · DOI
  5. [7]Coombs LA, Neller S, Wilson C, Mihas P, Reuland D, Muss H, et al. Treatment decision conversations, symptoms, and functional status in older adults with advanced cancer: an exploratory study utilizing mixed methods. J Geriatr Oncol. 2022:101414. 10.1016/j.jgo.2022.12.002. PMC9975145 36503882 · DOI
  6. [8]Jayani R Hurria A Caregivers of older adults with cancer Semin Oncol Nurs 2012 28 4 221 225 10.1016/j.soncn.2012.09.004 23107179 PMC4096853 · DOI
  7. [11]•• Young HM, Bell JF, Whitney RL, Ridberg RA, Reed SC, Vitaliano PP. Social determinants of health: underreported heterogeneity in systematic reviews of caregiver interventions. Gerontologist. 2020;60(Suppl 1):S14-S28. 10.1093/geront/gnz148. This systematic review identifies gaps in research on social determinants of health and caregivers. A model of heterogneity of caregiving is explicated. PMC7019663 32057083 · DOI
  8. [13]Kamen C Lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) survivorship Semin Oncol Nurs 2018 34 1 52 59 10.1016/j.soncn.2017.12.002 29275016 PMC5811352 · DOI
  9. [14]Tucker-Seeley RD Wallington SF Canin B Tang W McKoy JM Health equity for older adults with cancer J Clin Oncol 2021 39 19 2205 2216 10.1200/JCO.21.00207 34043411 · DOI
  10. [15]Boehmer U Clark MA Heeren TC Showalter EA Fredman L Differences in caregiving outcomes and experiences by sexual orientation and gender identity LGBT Health 2018 5 2 112 120 10.1089/lgbt.2017.0144 29364755 · DOI
  11. [16]Power R Ussher JM Perz J Allison K Hawkey AJ “Surviving discrimination by pulling together”: LGBTQI cancer patient and carer experiences of minority stress and social support Front Oncol 2022 12 918016 10.3389/fonc.2022.918016 35814403 PMC9263127 · DOI
  12. [17]Rice D Schabath MB The future of LGBT cancer care: practice and research implications Semin Oncol Nurs 2018 34 1 99 115 10.1016/j.soncn.2017.12.007 29329960 · DOI
  13. [19]Burkhalter JE, Margolies L, Sigurdsson HO, Walland J, Radix A, Rice D, et al. The national LGBT cancer action plan: a white paper of the 2014 national summit on cancer in the LGBT communities. LGBT Health. 2016:19–31. 10.1089/lgbt.2015.0118. · DOI
  14. [20]Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Lesbian G, Bisexual, and Transgender Health Issues and Research Gaps and Opportunities. The health of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender people: building a foundation for better understanding. In: (US) NAP, editor. Washington (DC)2011. 22013611
  15. [21]Stein GL Berkman C O'Mahony S Godfrey D Javier NM Maingi S Experiences of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender patients and families in hospice and palliative care: perspectives of the Palliative Care Team J Palliat Med 2020 23 6 817 824 10.1089/jpm.2019.0542 31916901 · DOI
  16. [22]Cloyes KG, Jones M, Gettens C, Wawrzynski SE, Bybee S, Tay DL, et al. Providing home hospice care for LGBTQ+ patients and caregivers: perceptions and opinions of hospice interdisciplinary care team providers. Palliat Support Care. 2022:1–9. 10.1017/S1478951522000657. 35586976 · DOI
  17. [23]Candrian C Cloyes KG “She’s dying and I can’t say we’re married?”: end-of-life care for LGBT older adults Gerontologist 2020 61 8 1197 1201 10.1093/geront/gnaa186 33305806 · DOI
  18. [24]Cloyes KG Hull W Davis A Palliative and end-of-life care for lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) cancer patients and their caregivers Semin Oncol Nurs 2018 34 1 60 71 10.1016/j.soncn.2017.12.003 29306523 PMC5863535 · DOI
  19. [25]Boehmer U Clark MA Lord EM Fredman L Caregiving status and health of heterosexual, sexual minority, and transgender adults: results from select U.S. regions in the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System 2015 and 2016 Gerontologist. 2019 59 4 760 9 10.1093/geront/gny109 30215703 · DOI
  20. [26]Thompson T Heiden-Rootes K Joseph M Gilmore LA Johnson L Proulx CM The support that partners or caregivers provide sexual minority women who have cancer: a systematic review Soc Sci Med. 2020 261 113214 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113214 32738634 PMC8171311 · DOI
  21. [27]• Kamen CS, Hastert TA, Mulvaney M, Hosea F, VanBergen AM, Fakih A, et al. Community-driven identification and adaptation of a cancer caregiving intervention for LGBTQIA populations. Front Oncol. 2022;12:873491. 10.3389/fonc.2022.873491. This articles summarizes the adaptation of an existing intervention for LGTBQ+ populations. PMC9253545 35800052 · DOI
  22. [29]Best AL Roberson ML Plascak JJ Peterson CE Rogers CR Hastert TA Structural racism and cancer: calls to action for cancer researchers to address racial/ethnic cancer inequity in the United States Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2022 31 6 1243 1246 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-21-1179 35642391 PMC9306268 · DOI
  23. [30]• Hastert TA, Ruterbusch JJ, Nair M, Noor MI, Beebe-Dimmer JL, Schwartz K, et al. Employment outcomes, financial burden, anxiety, and depression among caregivers of African American cancer survivors. JCO Oncol Pract. 2020;16(3):e221-e33. 10.1200/JOP.19.00410. This study identifies risk for anxiety and depression related to financial burden and employment changes in caregivers of African American cancer suvivors. PMC7069702 31496392 · DOI · Paper page
  24. [31]Longacre ML Miller MF Fang CY Racial and ethnic variations in caregiving-related physical, emotional, and financial strain during COVID-19 among those caring for adult cancer patients Support Care Cancer 2021 29 7 4137 4146 10.1007/s00520-020-05933-9 33404809 PMC7785926 · DOI
  25. [32]Kratzer TB, Jemal A, Miller KD, Nash S, Wiggins C, Redwood D, et al. Cancer statistics for American Indian and Alaska Native individuals, 2022: including increasing disparities in early onset colorectal cancer. CA Cancer J Clin. 2022. 10.3322/caac.21757. 36346402 · DOI
  26. [33]Bechthold AC Azuero A Pisu M Pierce JY Williams GR Taylor RA The Project ENABLE Cornerstone randomized controlled trial: study protocol for a lay navigator-led, early palliative care coaching intervention for African American and rural-dwelling advanced cancer family caregivers Trials 2022 23 1 452 10.1186/s13063-022-06305-w 35655285 PMC9161197 · DOI · Paper page
  27. [34]Kent EE, Lee S, Asad S, Dobbins EE, Aimone EV, Park EM. “If I wasn't in a rural area, I would definitely have more support”: social needs identified by rural cancer caregivers and hospital staff. J Psychosoc Oncol. 2022:1–18. 10.1080/07347332.2022.2129547. PMC10083183 36214743 · DOI
  28. [35]Ratnapradipa KL Ranta J Napit K Luma LB Robinson T Dinkel D Qualitative analysis of cancer care experiences among rural cancer survivors and caregivers J Rural Health 2022 38 4 876 885 10.1111/jrh.12665 35381622 PMC9492624 · DOI
  29. [36]Ugalde A Blaschke S Boltong A Schofield P Aranda S Phipps-Nelson J Understanding rural caregivers’ experiences of cancer care when accessing metropolitan cancer services: a qualitative study BMJ Open. 2019 9 7 e028315 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028315 31300501 PMC6629412 · DOI
  30. [38]Bouldin ED Shaull L Andresen EM Edwards VJ McGuire LC Financial and health barriers and caregiving-related difficulties among rural and urban caregivers J Rural Health 2018 34 3 263 274 10.1111/jrh.12273 28940539 PMC5866208 · DOI
  31. [39]van der Kruk SR Butow P Mesters I Boyle T Olver I White K Psychosocial well-being and supportive care needs of cancer patients and survivors living in rural or regional areas: a systematic review from 2010 to 2021 Support Care Cancer 2022 30 2 1021 1064 10.1007/s00520-021-06440-1 34392413 PMC8364415 · DOI
  32. [40]Edward J Bowling W Chitwood H Vanderpool R Availability and accessibility of cancer care delivery approaches to reduce financial toxicity of rural and urban cancer patients in Kentucky J Oncol Navig Surviv 2022 13 5 156 164 36698508 PMC9873237
  33. [42]Blake KD Moss JL Gaysynsky A Srinivasan S Croyle RT Making the case for investment in rural cancer control: an analysis of rural cancer incidence, mortality, and funding trends Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2017 26 7 992 997 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-17-0092 28600296 PMC5500425 · DOI
  34. [43]Flinn B Millenial: The emerging generation of family caregivers Innov Aging. 2018 2 Suppl 1 240 10.1093/geroni/igy023.896 · DOI
  35. [44]Reed N Bouldin E Taylor C McGuire L Millennials as caregivers: results from the BRFSS, 44 States, DC, and Puerto Rico, 2015–2018 Innov Aging 2020 10.1093/geroni/igaa057.113 · DOI
  36. [46]Arnett J Emerging adulthood: what is it, and what is it good for? Child Dev Perspect 2007 1 2 68 73 10.1111/j.1750-8606.2007.00016.x · DOI · Paper page
  37. [47]Waters AR, Gren LH, Rogers CR, Kirchhoff AC, Warner EL. Qualitative inquiry of cancer caregiving during young adulthood: responsibilities, challenges, teamwork, and social support. J Psychosoc Oncol Res Pract. 2021;3(4). 10.1097/or9.0000000000000062. PMC8570566 34746795 · DOI
  38. [48]Thomas Hebdon MC Jones M Neller S Kent-Marvick J Thomas M Stewart E Stress and supportive care needs of millennial caregivers: a qualitative analysis West J Nurs Res 2022 44 3 205 213 10.1177/01939459211056689 34713777 PMC10448700 · DOI
  39. [49]Warner EL Kirchhoff AC Ellington L Waters AR Sun Y Wilson A Young adult cancer caregivers’ use of social media for social support Psychooncology 2020 29 7 1185 1192 10.1002/pon.5402 32364665 · DOI
  40. [50]Warner EL Waters AR Cloyes KG Ellington L Kirchhoff AC Young adult cancer caregivers’ exposure to cancer misinformation on social media Cancer 2021 127 8 1318 1324 10.1002/cncr.33380 33368215 · DOI
  41. [51]Fergus K Ahmad S Gardner S Ianakieva I McLeod D Stephen J Couplelinks online intervention for young couples facing breast cancer: a randomised controlled trial Psychooncology 2022 31 3 512 520 10.1002/pon.5836 34669239 · DOI
  42. [52]Fergus K Ahmad S McLeod DL Stephen J Gardner S Pereira A Couplelinks - an online intervention for young women with breast cancer and their male partners: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial Trials 2015 16 33 10.1186/s13063-014-0534-8 25630357 PMC4336511 · DOI
  43. [53]Gorman JR Lyons KS Harvey SM Acquati C Salsman JM Kashy DA Opening the Conversation: study protocol for a Phase III trial to evaluate a couple-based intervention to reduce reproductive and sexual distress among young adult breast and gynecologic cancer survivor couples Trials 2022 23 1 730 10.1186/s13063-022-06665-3 36056413 PMC9438271 · DOI
  44. [55]Armstrong-Carter E Johnson C Belkowitz J Siskowski C Olson E The United States should recognize and support caregiving youth Soc Policy Rep 2021 34 2 1 24 10.1002/sop2.14 · DOI
  45. [56]• Justin P, Lamore K, Dorard G, Untas A. Are there young carers in oncology? A systematic review. Psychooncology. 2021;30(9):1430–41. 10.1002/pon.5708. This systematic review identifies that despite children providing care to ill family members, they are often not designated as caregivers. PMC9292599 33993613 · DOI
  46. [58]Hendricks B, Kavanaugh M, MA. B. How far have we come? An updated scoping review of young carers in the U.S. Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal. 2021;38:491–504. 10.1007/s10560-021-00783-8. · DOI
  47. [59]Lally RM Hydeman J Brooks C Akter H Yoerg MT Experiences and needs of African American children and adolescents in supportive care roles for a relative with breast cancer Oncol Nurs Forum 2020 47 2 165 176 10.1188/20.ONF.165-176 32078616 · DOI
  48. [60]Hendricks B Vo J Dionne-Odom JN Bakitas MA Parentification among young carers: a concept analysis Child Adolesc Soc Work J 2021 38 519 531 10.1007/s10560-021-00784-7 PMC11142575 38828384 · DOI · Paper page
  49. [61]Joseph S Sempik J Leu A Becker S Young carers research, practice and policy: an overview and critical perspective on possible future directions Adolesc Res Rev 2019 5 77 89 10.1007/s40894-019-00119- · DOI
  50. [62]Leach CR Weaver KE Aziz NM Alfano CM Bellizzi KM Kent EE The complex health profile of long-term cancer survivors: prevalence and predictors of comorbid conditions J Cancer Surviv 2015 9 2 239 251 10.1007/s11764-014-0403-1 25319681 · DOI
  51. [63]National Academies of Sciences E, and Medicine. Families caring for an aging America. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2016. 27905704
  52. [64]Schulz R Beach SR Caregiving as a risk factor for mortality: the Caregiver Health Effects Study JAMA 1999 282 23 2215 2219 10.1001/jama.282.23.2215 10605972 · DOI · Paper page
  53. [65]• Utz RL, Warner EL. Caregiver burden among diverse caregivers. Cancer. 2022;128(10):1904–6. 10.1002/cncr.34171. This editorial presents pragmatic recommendations for future research indeavors among diverse caregivers. PMC9038644 35285941 · DOI
  54. [66]Damaskos P Amaya B Gordon R Walters CB Intersectionality and the LGBT cancer patient Semin Oncol Nurs 2018 34 1 30 36 10.1016/j.soncn.2017.11.004 29325815 PMC7424551 · DOI
  55. [67]Kelly-Brown J Palmer Kelly E Obeng-Gyasi S Chen JC Pawlik TM Intersectionality in cancer care: a systematic review of current research and future directions Psychooncology 2022 31 5 705 716 10.1002/pon.5890 35199401 · DOI
  56. [68]Sperber N, Van Houtven C, Andrews S, Miller K, Steinhauser K, Wieland GD, et al. Family caregiver use and value of support services in the VA Program of Comprehensive Assistance for Family Caregivers. J Long-Term Care. 2018. 10.31389/jltc.4. · DOI
  57. [69]• Applebaum AJ, Kent EE, Lichtenthal WG. Documentation of caregivers as a standard of care. J Clin Oncol. 2021;39(18):1955–8. 10.1200/jco.21.00402. This commentary describes the necessity and minimum guidelines for documention of caregivers. PMC8260920 33945287 · DOI

Authors
Tan, K. R., Waters, A. R., Chen, Q., Hendricks, B. A., Coombs, L. A., & Kent, E. E.
Affiliations
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
  • The University of Texas at Austin (US)
  • University of Nebraska Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Tan, Kelly R.
ORCID
Venue
Current Oncology Reports
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2023-04-12
Volume
25
Issue
7
Pages
803-812
ISSN
  • 1523-3790 (ISSN-L)
  • 1534-6269
DOI
10.1007/s11912-023-01415-3
PMC
PMC10091341
OpenAlex
W4365135167
Cited by
40
References
62
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 2
FWCI
2.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Current Oncology Reports (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Carolina Digital Repository (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill) (submittedVersion)
  • UNC Libraries
Funders
National Cancer Institute (T32CA116339)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Nursing care and research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving
Keywords
cancer caregiving, health equity, elderly cancer patients, rural caregivers, young adult caregivers, caregiver financial burden, caregiver mental health, culturally tailored interventions
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Aged, Humans, Neoplasms, Caregivers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review