Cited by 61Cancer survivorship and careNursing care and researchEconomic and Financial Impacts of Cancer

Employment outcomes, financial burden, anxiety, and depression among caregivers of African American cancer survivors

Open access
Hastert, Theresa A., Ruterbusch, Julie J., Nair, Mrudula, Noor, Mirza Ishrat, Beebe-Dimmer, Jennifer L., Schwartz, Kendra, Baird, Tara E., Harper, Felicity W.K. +2 more·2020·JCO Oncology Practice

Abstract

Purpose Caregivers of cancer survivors may need to take time off work or make other employment changes to handle caregiving demands. Work impacts of caregiving, financial burden, and psychosocial outcomes of caregivers are not well understood. Methods Results include information from surveys completed by 202 employed caregivers of participants in the Detroit Research on Cancer Survivors cohort, a population-based cohort of African American survivors of breast, colorectal, lung, or prostate cancer. Relationships between work outcomes, financial burden, and anxiety and depression were assessed using logistic regression models controlling for demographic and cancer-related factors. Results Most (73.8%) caregivers made some employment change. Sixty percent changed their schedule, hours, duties, or employment status; 15.3% took at least 1 month off to provide care, and 38% reported difficulty balancing work and caregiving. Employment changes were strongly associated with difficulty balancing work and caregiving (odds ratio [OR], 5.83; 95% CI, 2.38 to 14.0) and financial burden (OR, 2.12; 95% CI, 1.05 to 4.27). Difficulty balancing work and caregiving was associated with symptoms of anxiety (OR, 1.86; 95% CI, 1.01 to 3.43) and depression (OR, 2.40; 95% CI, 1.16 to 4.96). High ( v low) financial burden was associated with symptoms of anxiety (OR, 2.85; 95% CI, 1.01 to 8.06). Conclusion Difficulty balancing work and caregiving is common among caregivers of African American cancer sur…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1200/jop.19.00410

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hastert, T. A., Ruterbusch, J. J., Nair, M., Noor, M. I., Beebe-Dimmer, J. L., Schwartz, K., Baird, T. E., Harper, F. W. K., Thompson, H., & Schwartz, A. G.
Affiliations
  • Wayne State University (US)
  • Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI
Venue
JCO Oncology Practice
Published
2020-03
Volume
16
Issue
3
Pages
e221-e233
ISSN
  • 2688-1527 (ISSN-L)
  • 2688-1535
OpenAlex
W2971474741
Cited by
61
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 2
FWCI
2.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • JCO Oncology Practice (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (n01pc35145-19-0-7)
  • National Cancer Institute (N01 PC035145, U01CA199240)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Nursing care and research
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer
Keywords
cancer caregivers, African American cancer survivors, employment change, financial burden, anxiety, depression, psychosocial well-being, breast cancer, colorectal cancer, lung cancer, prostate cancer, caregiver support
MeSH terms
Cancer Survivors, Anxiety, Black or African American, Costs and Cost Analysis, Depression, Employment, Female, Humans, Male, Caregivers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review