Improvement of depression following transcranial magnetic stimulation
Abstract
Psychiatry as a field was transformed by the discovery and introduction of electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) as a treatment in the early part of this century. ECT demonstrated that depression was a disease of the brain and that it could be treated with a direct brain intervention. Psychiatry's evolution continued in 1958 with the discovery of the antidepressant activity of the monoamine oxidase inhibitors. Interestingly, although the area of neuropsychopharmacology has continued to advance, the realm of physical somatic interventions in psychiatry has lagged behind. With perhaps the exception of light therapy, there were no advances in somatic interventions in psychiatry. However, in 1985, Barker et al. developed a brief high intensity electromagnet capable of depolarizing cortical neurons, called transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). There has been much interest in the past 10 years in whether TMS might have antidepressant actions, similar to ECT but without causing a seizure and with no apparent cognitive side effects. This review examines the basic principles underlying TMS, and describes how TMS differs from electrical stimulation and the other uses of magnets.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
TMS has demonstrated efficacy in the treatment of depression in large, multisite, sham-controlled trials.
“Seminal studies by George et al [19] demonstrated the efficacy of TMS in the treatment of depression in large, multisite sham-controlled trials.”
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 91 · Cited by 39
- Authors
- George, M. S., Nahas, Z., Kozel, F. A., Goldman, J., Molloy, M., & Oliver, N.
- Affiliations
- Medical University of South Carolina (US)
- Venue
- Current Psychiatry Reports
- Published
- 1999-12
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 114-124
- ISSN
- 1523-3812 (ISSN-L)
- 1535-1645
- OpenAlex
- W2022211890
- Cited by
- 39
- References
- 91
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 4 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 0.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Current Psychiatry Reports (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Medical University of South Carolina
- National Alliance for Research on Schizophrenia and Depression
- National Institutes of Health (5r01rr014080-02, 5r01mh046673-08)
- National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH46673-07)
- National Center for Research Resources (RR14080)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Electroconvulsive Therapy Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
- Keywords
- transcranial magnetic stimulation, depression, antidepressant effects, electroconvulsive therapy, neuropsychopharmacology, monoamine oxidase inhibitors, phototherapy
- MeSH terms
- Cerebral Cortex, Depressive Disorder, Electric Stimulation Therapy, Humans, Neurons, Scalp, Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review