Frontal Pole Neuromodulation for Impulsivity and Suicidality in Veterans With Mild Traumatic Brain Injury and Common Co-Occurring Mental Health Conditions: Protocol for a Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Background: Suicide remains a leading cause of death among veterans in the United States, and mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) increases the risk of suicidal ideation (SI) and suicide attempts (SAs). mTBI worsens impulsivity and contributes to poor social and occupational functioning, which further increases the risk of SI and SAs. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation is a neuromodulatory treatment approach that induces neuroplasticity, potentially repairing neurodamage. Intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) is a second-generation form of transcranial magnetic stimulation that is safe, shorter in duration, displays a minimal side effect profile and is a promising treatment approach for impulsivity in mTBI. Our novel proposed treatment protocol uses frontal pole iTBS to target the ventromedial prefrontal cortex, which may reduce impulsivity by strengthening functional connectivity between the limbic system and frontal cortex, allowing for improved top-down control of impulsive reactions, including SI and SAs. Objective: The objectives of this study are to (1) develop an iTBS intervention for veterans with mTBI, impulsivity, and SI; (2) assess the feasibility and tolerability of the intervention; and (3) gather preliminary clinical outcome data on SI, impulsivity, and functions that will guide future studies. Methods: This is a pilot, double-blinded, randomized controlled trial. In developing this protocol, we referenced the SPIRIT (Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials) guidelines. We will enroll 56 participants (28 active iTBS and 28 sham iTBS). The iTBS intervention will be performed daily, 5 days a week, for 2 weeks. We will collect 10 validated, psychometric, quantitative outcome measures before, during, and after the intervention. Measures included will assess functioning, impulsivity, suicidality, posttraumatic stress disorder, and depressive symptoms. We will collect qualitative data through semistructured interviews to elicit feedback on the participants’ experiences and symptoms. We will perform quantitative and qualitative analyses to (1) assess the feasibility, tolerability, and acceptability of the treatment; (2) gather advanced neuroimaging data to assess neural changes elicited by treatment; and (3) assess improvements in outcome measures of impulsivity and suicidality in veterans with mTBI. Results: This study protocol was approved by the Edward Hines, Jr. VA Hospital Institutional Review Board (Hines IRB number 14-003). This novel treatment is a 5-year research project (April 1, 2023, to March 31, 2028) funded by the Veterans Administration Rehabilitation Research and Development service (CDA2 award IK2 RX002938). Study results will be disseminated at or before the project’s end date in March 2028. Conclusions: We will provide preliminary evidence of the safety, feasibility, and acceptability of a novel frontal pole iTBS treatment for mTBI, impulsivity, SI and SAs, and functional deficits. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05647044; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05647044 International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID): PRR1-10.2196/58206
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
This is a protocol for a pilot, double-blind, sham-controlled randomized trial of frontal pole intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) in veterans with mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI), impulsivity, and suicidal ideation. The study aims to assess safety, feasibility, tolerability, preliminary clinical outcomes, and pre/post neuroimaging changes, with results expected by March 2028.
Key findings
- No clinical efficacy findings are reported; the paper presents a protocol. As of July 2024, 2 participants were enrolled, with enrollment beginning in July 2024 and dissemination planned on or before March 2028.
- The planned sample is 56 veterans (28 active iTBS and 28 sham iTBS), with 10 iTBS sessions delivered daily, 5 days a week, for 2 weeks.
- The power analysis assumes a mean Social and Occupational Functioning Assessment Scale (SOFAS) score of 44.6 and SD of 15; with 50 veterans, the study will have 82% power to detect a time-by-treatment interaction assuming no change in the sham group and a 13-point change in the active iTBS group.
- The authors hypothesize that frontal pole iTBS will be safe, feasible, and tolerable; improve social and occupational functioning, negative urgency impulsivity, and suicidal ideation; and strengthen resting-state functional connectivity between the ventromedial prefrontal cortex (VMPFC) and limbic system, especially the amygdala and anterior cingulate cortex.
Methods
- Pilot, prospective, randomized, double-blinded, sham-controlled trial enrolling 56 veterans aged 22-65 years with mTBI at least 1 year before enrollment, impulsivity documented in the chart and UPPS-P Negative Urgency score >20, and suicidal ideation within the past 3 months (Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale score ≥1). Exclusions include active suicidal ideation with intent and plan, contraindications to TMS or MRI, active substance use disorder, history of moderate to severe TBI, and others.
- Intervention: 9-minute iTBS to the right frontal pole (FP2, overlapping right VMPFC), delivering 1800 pulses at 110% of motor threshold, with 3 pulses at 50 Hz repeated every 200 ms, a 2-second train every 10 seconds for 570 seconds. Sessions occur once daily for 10 business days; active and sham coils are visually identical, with headphones and scalp electrodes used for blinding.
- Data collection and analysis: MRI before and after treatment (T1, resting-state fMRI, diffusion tensor imaging), 10 validated psychometric measures at screening, baseline, midpoint, and endpoint, plus semistructured qualitative interviews. Analyses include descriptive statistics, mixed-model ANOVA for SOFAS, generalized linear models for connectivity, Fisher R-to-Z transformation, ROI-to-ROI connectivity analyses, false-discovery rate correction, and covariates such as age, sex, and baseline psychiatric diagnoses.
Limitations
- The paper states that the small sample size reduces study power and may limit detection of statistically significant outcome differences; baseline variability in co-occurring psychiatric and somatic conditions and medications may impact findings, and only select covariates can be added given the small sample.
- The paper states that the 72-hour post-treatment follow-up will not provide insight into long-term effects, that optimal iTBS dose parameters remain uncertain, and that the study does not select targets based on resting-state data.
- Evident from the text: this is a protocol with no efficacy or safety results yet; as of July 2024, only 2 participants were enrolled, so all clinical and neuroimaging findings are pending.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
82 of 148 cited sources checked · 11 supported · 1 flagged · accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Negative urgency impulsivity increases the likelihood of SI.
“Unsurprisingly, negative urgency impulsivity increases the likelihood of SI [41]”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [41] source
The Results (Bivariate Correlations; page unavailable) report a significant positive association between Negative Urgency and all five suicidality and self-injury measures, including past suicidal ideation. The Results (Incremental Validity; page unavailable) also find that its association with these outcomes was strong among participants low in premeditation but nonsignificant among those high in premeditation. These associations support a link with SI, but do not establish that Negative Urgency itself increases its likelihood. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
TBI predisposes individuals to impulsivity.
“TBI predisposes individuals to functional deficits [14,15] and impulsivity [16], and those with impulsivity likely struggle with functional deficits [17].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [16] source
The Introduction discusses urgency and risk-taking, and the Discussion lists disorders associated with impulsivity; neither addresses traumatic brain injury. Searches for “TBI” and “traumatic brain injury” found no passage stating that TBI predisposes individuals to impulsivity. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.76)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
The VMPFC is particularly vulnerable to damage in all severities of TBI because it abuts the cranial floor and frontal cranial bone, making it susceptible to coup and contrecoup forces from nearly all directions.
“The VMPFC, which serves as an inhibitory control center for the limbic system, is particularly vulnerable to damage in all severities of TBI as this region abuts the cranial floor and frontal cranial bone, making it susceptible to coup and contrecoup forces from nearly all directions [31,44,45].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 3 sources checked- cites [31] source
The Materials and methods (MRI analyses; page unavailable) identify the ventromedial prefrontal cortex as a region of interest, but the paper studies suicidal vulnerability in mood disorders, not traumatic brain injury. Searches for TBI, cranial-floor anatomy, and coup–contrecoup forces found no passage supporting the claimed vulnerability across TBI severities. (LLM, conf=0.73)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [44] source
- cites [45] source
- Premisecitation
TMS also improves PTSD symptoms among those with co-occurring mTBI.
“TMS also improves PTSD symptoms among those with co-occurring mTBI [22,27].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 2 sources checked- cites [22] source
- cites [27] source
The “rTMS as a PTSD treatment” section reports improved PTSD symptoms in studies of patients with PTSD, including some with co-occurring depression. But the “Co-occurring conditions” section says the trial involving patients with PTSD, TBI, or both reported no PTSD-specific outcomes. The paper therefore does not establish improvement in PTSD symptoms among people with co-occurring mTBI. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Diminished VMPFC-limbic connectivity is suspected to be responsible for impulsivity and SI in individuals with mTBI.
“This diminished connectivity is suspected to be responsible for impulsivity and SI in individuals with mTBI [30-32].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim3 of 3 sources checked- cites [30] source
The Discussion (Prefrontal-Parietal RSFC; page not provided) reports that reduced fronto-parietal connectivity in young depressed patients with suicide attempts was associated with both impulsivity and suicidal-ideation scores. The Conclusion says prefrontal–rACC connectivity was associated with impulsivity but not suicidal-ideation scores. This paper does not study individuals with mTBI or establish that diminished VMPFC–limbic connectivity is responsible for both outcomes in that population. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [31] source
The Discussion links dysfunction of an interconnected prefrontal network to suicidal ideas, and the Results report correlations between prefrontal structural measures and impulsiveness in patients with mood disorders. The paper does not establish diminished VMPFC–limbic connectivity as the cause of impulsivity or suicidal ideation, and it does not study individuals with mTBI. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.78)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [32] source
The Results and Discussion (page not available) report associations between blast-induced mTBI severity and amygdala activity, while the Summary discusses vmPFC-sgACC activity in relation to posttraumatic stress symptoms. Searches for vmPFC–limbic connectivity, impulsivity, and suicidal ideation found no passage linking diminished connectivity to those outcomes in people with mTBI. (LLM, conf=0.74)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
In the authors' laboratory's previous chart review study, negative urgency impulsivity most strongly mediated the relationship between a history of TBI and SI and SAs.
“Our laboratory’s previous work built upon these findings and completed a chart review study that found negative urgency impulsivity most strongly mediated the relationship between a history of TBI and SI and SAs [43].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [43] source
- Premisecitation
Those with impulsivity likely struggle with functional deficits.
“TBI predisposes individuals to functional deficits [14,15] and impulsivity [16], and those with impulsivity likely struggle with functional deficits [17].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [17] source
The Discussion (page unavailable) says executive dysfunction after TBI is often characterized by impulsive behaviors, linking impulsivity to one kind of deficit. It does not establish that people with impulsivity generally struggle with broader functional deficits, such as limitations in employment or daily functioning. (LLM, conf=0.76)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Negative urgency impulsivity is particularly prevalent in the mTBI veteran population.
“A form of behavioral impulsivity, negative urgency impulsivity, is particularly prevalent in this population [38].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [38] source
The indexed passage under the 2013 Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society entry reports increased urgency after injury in 28 patients with moderate-to-severe TBI. It does not establish that negative urgency is particularly prevalent among veterans with mild TBI; neither that population nor a prevalence estimate is reported. (LLM, conf=0.87)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Among individuals with TBI, those who were unemployed in the past year were at the highest risk for SI when compared to individuals who had been employed.
“Among individuals with TBI, those who were unemployed in the past year were at the highest risk for SI when compared to individuals who had been employed [17].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [17] source
The Results (Participant characteristics; page not provided) report that participants with suicidal ideation at year 1 were more often unemployed at year 1. The Results (Modeling results; page not provided) also associate employment with a lower likelihood of suicidal ideation at year 2. But the paper measures employment status at follow-up, not whether someone was unemployed during the past year, and it does not establish that unemployed participants had the highest risk. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
The VMPFC appears to exhibit less functional connectivity with the limbic system in individuals with mTBI.
“We are interested in stimulating the ventromedial prefrontal cortex (VMPFC) with iTBS because the VMPFC appears to exhibit less functional connectivity with the limbic system in individuals with mTBI [30].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [30] source
The Discussion (Prefrontal-Parietal RSFC; page unavailable) reports decreased connectivity between the orbitomedial prefrontal cortex and rostral anterior cingulate cortex in patients with major depressive disorder and suicidal ideation. That is related to the claimed prefrontal connectivity reduction, but the paper does not establish it for the VMPFC–limbic system specifically or for individuals with mTBI. (LLM, conf=0.74)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
There is accumulating evidence supporting the safety and efficacy of TMS for sequelae of mTBI and related neuropsychiatric conditions, including depression, cognitive deficits, and chronic pain or headaches.
“There is accumulating evidence supporting the safety and efficacy of TMS for sequelae of mTBI and related neuropsychiatric conditions, including depression, cognitive deficits, and chronic pain or headaches [23-26].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 4 sources checked- cites [23] source
The Abstract Results support rTMS safety after concussion but say evidence for efficacy in this population is limited. The Results report mixed findings for depression and no significant cognitive benefit; the passages do not establish efficacy for chronic pain or headaches. No page numbers are available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.87)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [24] source
The Introduction reports that TMS has improved cognitive and psychological problems after TBI, and the Results (section 3.3) find a positive cognitive effect for non-invasive brain stimulation overall. But the meta-analysis combines TMS with tDCS and does not establish a TMS-specific effect; it also does not assess TMS safety or efficacy for depression, chronic pain, or headaches, or restrict its findings to mild TBI. The References list studies on depression and mild-TBI headaches, but their titles alone do not establish those outcomes. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [25] source
- cites [26] source
- Premisecitation
The VMPFC serves as an inhibitory control center for the limbic system.
“The VMPFC, which serves as an inhibitory control center for the limbic system, is particularly vulnerable to damage in all severities of TBI as this region abuts the cranial floor and frontal cranial bone, making it susceptible to coup and contrecoup forces from nearly all directions [31,44,45].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 3 sources checked- cites [31] source
The Introduction links prefrontal regions, including the ACC, to cognitive control and emotion regulation; the Methods define the paper’s medial prefrontal region as including the ACC. But neither passage says the VMPFC inhibits the limbic system or serves as its inhibitory control center. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.77)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [44] source
- cites [45] source
- Premisecitation
Post-TBI negative urgency impulsivity is presumed to be secondary to disinhibition of the limbic system from TBI-related damage to the prefrontal cortex, specifically the VMPFC, medial orbitofrontal cortex, or both.
“Post-TBI negative urgency impulsivity is presumed to be secondary to disinhibition of the limbic system from TBI-related damage to the prefrontal cortex, specifically the VMPFC, medial orbitofrontal cortex, or both [16].”
- Also stated in: § Rationale · plain
“Post-TBI negative urgency impulsivity is presumed to arise from limbic system disinhibition because of damage to the VMPFC [16].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [16] source
The Results and Discussion link negative urgency to amygdala and orbitofrontal activation in healthy young adults. The Participants section says they had no history of cerebral neurological disorders; the paper does not support the claim that post-TBI urgency results from prefrontal damage disinhibiting the limbic system. (LLM, conf=0.87)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Also stated in: § Rationale · plain
- Premisecitation
Pharmacotherapeutic treatment, primarily antidepressants, can take 6 to 8 weeks or more to become effective.
“Pharmacotherapeutic treatment (primarily antidepressants) can take 6 to 8 weeks or more to become effective [34].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [34] source
- Premisecitation
TMS has been shown to be effective in treating several TBI sequelae, including depression.
“It was later shown to be effective in treating several TBI sequelae, including depression [22].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [22] source
The Conclusions report real-world effectiveness of TMS for depression and PTSD in patients with mild TBI. The claim broadens this to TBI generally; the Introduction also describes mixed results for other post-TBI symptoms, including headache and cognitive symptoms. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Impulsivity is associated with TBI of all severities.
“Impulsivity is associated with TBI of all severities [16,37,38].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim3 of 3 sources checked- cites [16] source
The Introduction and Discussion address impulsivity in relation to risk-taking and several clinical disorders, but do not address traumatic brain injury. A search for “TBI” and “traumatic brain injury severity” found no passage linking impulsivity to TBI at any severity; the Participants section describes healthy social drinkers without a history of cerebral neurological disorders. Our copy therefore cannot verify the attributed claim. (LLM, conf=0.77)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [37] source
The Discussion reports impulsivity problems among participants with TBI and SAH. However, the Demographic and Neurological Data section says the TBI group included only moderate-to-severe injuries, so the paper does not establish the claim for TBI of all severities, including mild TBI. Page numbers are unavailable for these passages. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [38] source
The indexed passage for the 2013 paper (Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 19(8), pp. 890–898) reports increased impulsivity measures after TBI in patients with moderate to severe injuries. It does not establish the association for TBI of all severities, including mild TBI. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Multiple studies and meta-analyses demonstrate that TMS, administered to a variety of brain locations including the DLPFC, does not induce more significant numbers of adverse events among individuals with mTBI than among individuals without mTBI.
“Further, multiple studies and meta-analyses demonstrate that TMS, administered to a variety of brain locations, including the DLPFC, does not induce more significant numbers of AEs among individuals with mTBI than among individuals without mTBI [23,25,62,63].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim3 of 4 sources checked- cites [23] source
Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [25] source
- cites [62] source
Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [63] source
Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 0 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 1 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
TMS has an established safety record as a treatment for individuals with mTBI.
“TMS has an established safety record as a treatment for individuals with mTBI [23].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [23] source
The Abstract Results report no seizures or excess adverse events in the reviewed studies, supporting rTMS safety in people with concussion. The Discussion notes that this population has historically been excluded from studies and that the evidence consists of small samples; the Conclusion says further trials are needed to establish specific protocols as safe. Thus, “established safety record” overstates the evidence specific to mTBI. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
A recent meta-analysis suggested that only two-thirds of published studies demonstrated a reduction in SI with any pharmacotherapy compared to placebo.
“A recent meta-analysis suggested that only two-thirds of the published studies demonstrated a reduction in SI with any pharmacotherapy compared to placebo [35].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [35] source
The Results, under Treatment Interventions > Pharmacotherapy (page unavailable), report that antidepressants reduced suicidal ideation in 9 of 12 studies reporting that outcome. That supports the general finding, but 9 of 12 is three-quarters, not two-thirds; the passage also does not establish a placebo comparison for all 12 studies. The cited paper is a systematic review, not the meta-analysis described in the claim. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
The 72-hour spacing between iTBS completion and posttreatment imaging is long enough not to represent the immediate effects of the most recent stimulation.
“This time spacing between stimulation and imaging has been done in similar studies [78] and is thought to be a long enough gap post-iTBS completion not to represent the immediate effects of the most recent stimulation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [78] source
The Abstract describes an analysis of baseline structural MRI findings in a mild traumatic brain injury study, and the MR Imaging Protocol describes how scans were acquired. Neither passage addresses iTBS, a 72-hour interval after stimulation, or whether that interval excludes immediate effects; searches for those terms and for treatment-to-imaging timing found no supporting passage. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.75)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Frontal pole stimulation is a recent TMS and iTBS site of interest for reducing impulsive behaviors, including substance abuse and compulsions in obsessive compulsive disorder.
“Frontal pole stimulation is a recent TMS and iTBS site of interest for reducing impulsive behaviors, including substance abuse [82] and compulsions in obsessive compulsive disorder [83].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 2 sources checked- cites [82] source
The Discussion (§4.1) presents the frontal pole as a candidate stimulation target for addiction and reports neural effects in cocaine and alcohol users. But the study used continuous theta burst stimulation (cTBS), not iTBS, and did not establish a reduction in substance-use behavior. The OCD portion is attached to a different citation and is not judged here. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [83] source
- Premisecitation
An analysis suggests that changes in SI may be statistically independent of depression outcomes.
“Interestingly, an analysis suggests that changes in SI may be statistically independent of depression outcomes, underscoring the importance of studying SI separately from depression in contrast to many previous studies [77].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [77] source
The Discussion says the naturalistic data provide some indication that changes in suicidal-ideation frequency are partially independent of changes in depressive symptoms. The Results also report that improvement in depressive symptoms explained some variance in ideation improvement. The claim captures the tentative finding but omits the limits of partial independence and ideation frequency. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Study design and conductcitation
Attrition rates are expected to be low, under 10%, based on similar studies of iTBS protocols for patients with depression and PTSD receiving treatment of similar duration.
“On the basis of similar studies of iTBS protocols for patients with depression and PTSD, receiving treatment of similar duration, attrition rates are expected to be low—under 10% [58,90,91].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 3 sources checked - Premisecitation
In mTBI, thinning of the right VMPFC is evident when compared to healthy controls.
“In mTBI, thinning of the right VMPFC is evident when compared to healthy controls [78].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [78] source
The Volumetric Comparisons section reports significantly smaller right medial orbitofrontal cortical volume in the mTBI group than in healthy controls. The Discussion distinguishes that finding from cortical thinning: it attributes thinning of the right lateral orbitofrontal cortex to an earlier study, not to this paper's measurements. The cited paper therefore supports a regional volume difference, but not the claimed right VMPFC thinning. (LLM, conf=0.87)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Neuroimaging studies of individuals diagnosed with PTSD and substance use disorder demonstrate diminished volume and hypoactivity in the VMPFC.
“Moreover, neuroimaging studies of individuals diagnosed with PTSD and substance use disorder (2 conditions that are also associated with impulsive behavior and SI) demonstrate diminished volume and hypoactivity in the VMPFC [69,70].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 2 sources checked- cites [69] source
The Abstract and Discussion report smaller vmPFC volumes in maltreated youth with PTSD, and the Discussion reports smaller vmPFC volumes in adults with substance use disorder. The paper did not study participants with substance use disorder or measure vmPFC activity; its statement about hypoactivation concerns prediction of early substance-use initiation, not demonstrated hypoactivity in people diagnosed with either condition. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [70] source
The fMRI sections report reduced rACC/vmPFC activation in substance use disorders and describe hypoactivation in PTSD. They do not report diminished vmPFC volume or establish both findings in people diagnosed with both conditions. The Limitations section says the review could not assess the impact of comorbid PTSD on substance-use findings; page numbers were not provided in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Individuals exhibiting right VMPFC volume loss report increased aggression, anxiety, and depression following injury.
“Individuals exhibiting this volume loss report increased aggression, anxiety, and depression following injury [79].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [79] source
The Conclusion reports increased aggression, anxiety, and depression in the mTBI group, alongside reduced right lateral orbitofrontal cortical thickness. It does not establish right VMPFC volume loss or show that individuals with the thinning reported all three symptoms; the reported associations between orbitofrontal thickness and symptoms were nonsignificant. (LLM, conf=0.89)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Interpretationcitation
When mental illness diagnoses such as PTSD and substance use disorders co-occur with mTBI, they likely have an additive effect on brain functioning in the VMPFC, further worsening negative urgency impulsivity.
“Therefore, it is likely that when mental illness diagnoses such as PTSD and substance use disorders co-occur with mTBI, they have an additive effect on brain functioning in the VMPFC, further worsening negative urgency impulsivity [69,70].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 2 sources checked- cites [69] source
The Discussion (page unavailable) links PTSD, vmPFC differences, substance-use-disorder risk, and impulsivity. It does not establish an additive effect with mTBI or worsening negative urgency; the Subjects section (page unavailable) says traumatic brain injury and substance use disorders were exclusion criteria. (LLM, conf=0.87)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [70] source
The Routes of Dysfunction section (page unavailable) reports reduced rACC/vmPFC activation in substance use disorders and describes reduced activation in some disorders including PTSD. But Limitations and Future Work (page unavailable) says the impact of comorbid psychiatric disorders on neural circuitry could not be assessed. The paper does not establish an additive effect with mTBI or a resulting worsening of negative urgency impulsivity. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Drawing overall conclusions from the existing literature on TMS for suicidality remains challenging because of the heterogeneity of the data.
“However, drawing overall conclusions from the existing literature on TMS for suicidality remains challenging because of the heterogeneity of the data.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 2 sources checked- cites [75] source
The Abstract discusses limited studies of rTMS for depression after traumatic brain injury, and Secondary Outcomes reports variable effects across symptoms in this pilot trial. Neither passage assesses whether heterogeneity in the literature on TMS for suicidality makes overall conclusions difficult; searches for that topic found no such passage in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.75)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [76] source
The Studies of TMS in Depressed Adolescents section describes a small literature with varied study designs, populations, and stimulation protocols, supporting caution about drawing overall conclusions. The Safety section identifies increased suicidality as a possible adverse effect and notes gaps in safety data, but the paper does not assess a heterogeneous literature on TMS specifically for suicidality. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.76)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
The consensus in the literature is that iTBS can safely deliver 1800 pulses at 110% of the motor threshold to the frontal pole.
“The consensus in the literature is that iTBS can safely deliver 1800 pulses at 110% of the MT to the frontal pole [82,83].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 2 sources checked- cites [82] source
Methods §2.3 (page not provided) reports that frontal-pole stimulation at 110% of resting motor threshold was well tolerated. But the protocol was continuous theta burst stimulation (cTBS), with 3,600 pulses per visit—not iTBS with 1,800 pulses. Discussion §4.2 does not establish a consensus that the claimed iTBS protocol is safe. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [83] source
The Methods (TBS; page unavailable) describe stimulation of a left orbitofrontal/frontopolar target at up to 110% of resting motor threshold, but specify 600 ramp-up pulses followed by 600 active pulses—not 1,800 pulses at 110%. The Results (Tolerability; page unavailable) report no serious or unanticipated adverse events for the protocol studied. These findings do not establish a literature consensus or the safety of the claimed 1,800-pulse protocol. (LLM, conf=0.90)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Frontal pole iTBS is tolerable with good safety outcomes in individuals without mTBI.
“Furthermore, studies demonstrated frontal pole iTBS is tolerable with good safety outcomes in individuals without mTBI [63].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [63] source
The Methods identify continuous theta-burst stimulation at the frontal pole (FP1), but place intermittent theta-burst stimulation (iTBS) at F3, not the frontal pole. The concluding discussion says frontal-pole TMS was well tolerated, but the passages do not establish safety outcomes for frontal-pole iTBS or specify a population without mTBI. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Study design and conductcitation
Assuming a significance level of 0.05, a mean SOFAS score of 44.6, and a SD of 15, with 50 veterans, the study will have 82% power to detect a significant interaction between time and treatment assuming no change over time in the sham-iTBS group and a change of 13 points in the active iTBS group.
“Assuming a significance level of 0.05, a mean SOFAS score of 44.6, and a SD of 15, with 50 veterans, we will have 82% power to detect a significant interaction between time and treatment assuming no change over time in the sham-iTBS group and a change of 13 points in the active iTBS group [90].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [90] source
Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 1 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Encouraging meta-analyses suggest that TMS may also effectively treat suicidality.
“Encouraging meta-analyses suggest that TMS may also effectively treat suicidality [71,72].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 2 sources checked- cites [71] source
The Discussion > TMS Studies reports that most rTMS studies found reduced suicidal ideation, supporting the cautious suggestion that TMS may help. But this source is a systematic review, not a meta-analysis, and it cautions that the TMS evidence focuses on ideation, which does not reliably predict suicidal behavior. It therefore does not support the sentence’s broader characterization without qualification. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [72] source
The Results report significant reductions in suicidal ideation in four rTMS studies, supporting the cautious suggestion that TMS may help. But the Discussion reports inconsistent findings, and the Conclusion says the antisuicidal effect of rTMS needs confirmation and cannot yet be recommended. The cited paper is a systematic review, not a meta-analysis; page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Other studies have found meaningful change in both the UPPS-P and SOFAS over a 2-week neuromodulation intervention period among individuals with major depression.
“Other studies have specifically found meaningful change in both the UPPS-P and SOFAS over a 2-week neuromodulation intervention period among individuals with major depression [90,135].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 2 sources checked- cites [90] source
The Results (Clinical Outcomes; page not provided) report significant SOFAS improvement after two weeks of active stimulation. The paper does not report UPPS-P change. Its Methods identify chronic PTSD as the principal inclusion criterion, although the Results say 90% of participants had comorbid depression; it therefore does not establish the stated finding in a study of individuals recruited for major depression. (LLM, conf=0.90)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [135] source
The Results in our copy’s Abstract report reduced impulsivity and depression after rTMS in patients with borderline personality disorder. They do not report change on both the UPPS-P and SOFAS, establish a two-week intervention period, or describe the participants as having major depression. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Several studies on both iTBS and TMS administered to the DLPFC, of a variety of treatment durations, showed increased connectivity between the frontal cortex and areas of the limbic system.
“Several studies on both iTBS and TMS, administered to the DLPFC, of a variety of treatment durations, showed increased connectivity between the frontal cortex and areas of the limbic system [137].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [137] source
The Results (FC changes from baseline to post-treatment; page not provided) report increased connectivity between a prefrontal region and the amygdala after five days of DLPFC-targeted iTBS. The Introduction mentions other DLPFC TMS and iTBS studies, but describes connectivity changes without establishing that several studies of varying durations found increases. The Results also report decreased connectivity for another amygdala-related pair. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
Several repetitive TMS trials among individuals with suicidal ideation and major depression have shown reductions in suicidality.
“Several repetitive TMS (the precursor to iTBS) trials among individuals with SI and major depression have shown reductions in suicidality [71-74].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 4 sources checked - Premisecitation
iTBS can be administered in 3 to 10 minutes, compared to the standard 37.5-minute protocol for first-generation TMS.
“Using this approach, iTBS can be administered in 3 to 10 minutes, compared to the standard 37.5-minute protocol for first-generation TMS [58].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [58] source
- Premisecitation
Uninhibited limbic effect can manifest as poor frustration tolerance, fear, and aggression.
“Uninhibited limbic effect can manifest as poor frustration tolerance, fear, and aggression [46].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [46] Silver, JM, 2011, Textbook of Traumatic Brain Injury. 2nd edition
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
In large, multisite, double-blinded, sham-controlled trials, TMS applied to the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex was shown to effectively treat depression.
“In large, multisite, double-blinded, sham-controlled trials, TMS applied [51,52] to the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) was shown to effectively treat depression.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Premisecitation
Negative urgency impulsivity is associated with significant risk factors for suicide, such as social and occupational functional deficits.
“and is associated with significant risk factors for suicide, such as social and occupational functional deficits [42].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [42] source
- Premisecitation
One of the most prevalent and widely known iTBS treatment protocols is based on a study by Li et al and delivers 1800 pulses of iTBS per day for 10 days.
“One of the most prevalent and widely known iTBS treatment protocols is based on a study by Li et al [58] and delivers 1800 pulses of iTBS per day for 10 days.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [58] source
- Premisecitation
Veterans with TBI are 1.5 times more likely to die by suicide than veterans without TBI, even when controlling for comorbid psychiatric conditions.
“Veterans with TBI are 1.5 times more likely to die by suicide than veterans without TBI, even when controlling for comorbid psychiatric conditions [1,2].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [1] Ramchand, R, 2022, Rand Health Q
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [2] source
- Premisecitation
VA clinical practice guidelines cite having a history of TBI, functional deficits, past SI, and a history of impulsivity as independent risk factors for developing SI.
“The guidelines specifically cite having a history of TBI, functional deficits, past SI, and a history of impulsivity as independent risk factors for developing SI [13].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [13] VA/DOD clinical practice guidelines: assessment and management of patients at risk for suicideUS Department of Veterans Affairs2024-04-29https://www.healthquality.va.gov/guidelines/mh/srb/
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
TBI itself predisposes individuals to social and occupational functional deficits.
“TBI itself predisposes individuals to social and occupational functional deficits [47].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [47] source
- Premisecitation
TBI predisposes individuals to functional deficits.
“TBI predisposes individuals to functional deficits [14,15] and impulsivity [16], and those with impulsivity likely struggle with functional deficits [17].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Premisecitation
Uninhibited limbic effect can manifest as poor frustration tolerance and aggression, characteristics of negative urgency impulsivity.
“Uninhibited limbic effect can manifest as poor frustration tolerance and aggression, characteristics of negative urgency impulsivity [80].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [80] Silver, JM, 2011, Textbook of Traumatic Brain Injury. 2nd edition
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
A randomized controlled trial reported a 44% decrease in individuals experiencing thoughts of suicide after high-dose left-sided DLPFC TMS treatment.
“For example, a randomized controlled trial (RCT) reported a 44% decrease in individuals experiencing “thoughts of suicide” after high-dose left-sided DLPFC TMS treatment [73].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [73] source
- Premisecitation
The role of the VMPFC in negative urgency impulsivity is supported by evidence that individuals with penetrating TBI to the VMPFC are significantly more likely to become aggressive than those with penetrating TBI elsewhere.
“The role of the VMPFC in negative urgency impulsivity is also supported by evidence that individuals with penetrating TBI to the VMPFC are significantly more likely to become aggressive than those with penetrating TBI elsewhere [44].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [44] source
- Study design and conductnone given
The relatively short follow-up time of 72 hours after the final iTBS treatment will not provide insight into the long-term effects of the intervention.
“The relatively short follow-up time of 72 hours after the final iTBS treatment will not provide insight into the long-term effects of our intervention.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
A study of pooled sham-controlled trials reported that bilateral TMS is associated with a decline in SI.
“In addition, a study of pooled sham-controlled trials reported that bilateral TMS is associated with a decline in SI [74].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [74] source
- May combine two claims. 38
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 55
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationIndividuals without a history of mTBI who attempted suicide or have a history of SI also show diminished VMPFC volume and reduced connectivity between the prefrontal cortex and the limbic system.
“Interestingly, individuals without a history of mTBI who attempted suicide or have a history of SI also show diminished VMPFC volume and reduced connectivity between the prefrontal cortex and the limbic system, further supporting it as a potential therapeutic target [31,81].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 2 sources checked- cites [31] source
The Methods define the ventromedial prefrontal cortex as part of the MPFC region studied. The Discussion reports structural impairments in suicide attempters in the VLPFC, DPFC and OFC, but not MPFC—contrary to the claimed VMPFC reduction. This structural imaging study does not establish reduced prefrontal–limbic connectivity or the claim about people with suicidal ideation or no mTBI history. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [81] source
The Results report reduced frontal-lobe volume in psychiatric inpatients who recently attempted suicide compared with depressed non-attempters. They do not identify a VMPFC reduction, and they found no significant volumetric differences for the suicidal-ideation group. The study assessed brain volumes, not prefrontal–limbic connectivity; its Methods establish absence of head trauma for healthy controls, not for the psychiatric patients. (LLM, conf=0.89)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationTMS was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration in 2008 for the treatment of major depressive disorder.
“TMS was subsequently approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 2008 for the treatment of major depressive disorder [20].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [20] source
The Abstract states that the NeuroStar TMS device received FDA approval in October 2008 for a specific form of medication-refractory depression. The Discussion clarifies that approval was limited to a specified protocol, device, and patient population. The citing sentence gets the year and depression indication right but describes the approval more broadly than the source does. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationA meta-analysis of psychosocial factors found that difficulties in social and occupational functioning were strongly tied to increased levels of SI, social isolation, and low socioeconomic status and are directly associated with increased incidences of SI and completed suicides.
“A meta-analysis of psychosocial factors found that difficulties in social and occupational functioning were strongly tied to increased levels of SI, social isolation, and low socioeconomic status and are directly associated with increased incidences of SI and completed suicides (Figure 1) [48].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [48] source
The Social integration section links weaker social connections to higher suicide mortality, and the Socioeconomic status section links lower socioeconomic position to suicidal ideation and suicide deaths. But the paper describes itself as a narrative overview, not a meta-analysis, and it does not establish that difficulties in social and occupational functioning directly cause increased suicidal ideation or suicide. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn iTBS, 50 Hz triplets are applied at a theta rhythm of 5 Hz, which is thought to facilitate long-term potentiation in less time and with fewer pulses than standard TMS, which generally is administered at 5 to 10 Hz.
“In iTBS, 50 Hz triplets are applied at a theta rhythm (5 Hz), which is thought to facilitate long-term potentiation in less time and with fewer pulses than standard TMS, which generally is administered at 5 to 10 Hz [57].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [57] source
The Introduction (page unavailable) describes theta bursts repeated at 5 Hz for LTP induction, and ‘Economy’ of Theta-Burst Stimulation (page unavailable) reports that theta bursts induced LTP with fewer pulses than unpatterned stimulation. The experiments described used four-pulse bursts at 100 Hz in hippocampal tissue; these passages do not establish the 50 Hz triplets of iTBS, a shorter administration time, or a comparison with standard TMS administered at 5–10 Hz. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationStudies demonstrate that this number of pulses results in an optimal window of cortical excitability, and additional pulses may have an inhibitory effect.
“Studies demonstrate that this number of pulses results in an optimal “window” of cortical excitability, and additional pulses may have an inhibitory effect [59-61].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 3 sources checked- cites [59] source
- cites [60] source
The Results (iTBS versus ProiTBS; page unavailable) report that conventional intermittent theta-burst stimulation increased motor-cortex excitability, while prolonged stimulation suppressed it. The Introduction says pulse number and other parameters still need evaluation to optimize stimulation, so the study does not establish that the cited pulse count is an optimal window. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [61] source
The section on iTBS aftereffects reports that earlier studies observed decreases in cortical excitability after repeated stimulation, supporting the possibility of an inhibitory effect. But this study found no such decrease: a third block, bringing the total to 1800 pulses, further increased excitability. Its Conclusions therefore do not establish the claimed optimal pulse window. (LLM, conf=0.83)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn a national US VA TMS study of 770 veterans receiving TMS, nearly half had mTBI, and TMS was demonstrated to be equally safe in veterans with and without mTBI.
“Specifically, in a national US VA TMS study of 770 veterans receiving TMS, nearly half had mTBI, and TMS was demonstrated to be equally safe in veterans with and without mTBI [64].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [64] source
The Abstract (Results) reports 770 veterans receiving at least one TMS session, and Results (Safety) reports significant adverse outcomes in fewer than 1% of patients overall. Our copy does not report that nearly half had mTBI or compare safety between veterans with and without mTBI; searches for mTBI and traumatic brain injury did not find such an analysis. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationTMS has demonstrated efficacy in the treatment of PTSD, chronic pain, cognitive deficits, and headaches in individuals with mTBI.
“TMS also has demonstrated efficacy in the treatment of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), chronic pain, cognitive deficits, and headaches in individuals with mTBI [23-27].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim3 of 5 sources checked- cites [23] source
The Results section on PTSD symptoms following concussion reports a statistically significant finding in a small veteran subgroup, but says the evidence consists of small pilot trials. The Results section on cognitive symptoms reports no significant benefit on cognitive assessments, including in a sham-controlled trial. The Discussion mentions chronic pain and headache as co-occurring symptoms, not as conditions for which this paper demonstrates TMS efficacy. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [24] source
The Introduction reports that TMS has improved cognitive functions and psychological problems including PTSD in people with TBI. It does not limit those findings to mild TBI, and the paper’s analysis concerns cognition rather than chronic pain or headaches. Although the References list a study of TMS for mild-TBI-related headaches, that citation alone does not establish demonstrated efficacy for headaches. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [25] source
- cites [26] source
- cites [27] source
The ‘rTMS as a PTSD treatment’ section reports studies with improved PTSD symptoms, and the TBI-treatment section describes preliminary evidence of symptom improvement in 15 people with mTBI (page numbers unavailable). It does not establish efficacy for chronic pain, cognitive deficits, or headaches in people with mTBI; it also cautions that TBI treatment evidence is limited. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationAn overall estimate of 70% of individuals with mTBI struggle with at least one psychiatric comorbidity.
“An overall estimate of 70% of individuals with mTBI struggle with at least one psychiatric comorbidity [65].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [65] source
The POST-TBI PSYCHIATRIC DISORDERS section (page unavailable) reports that 74.5% received a psychiatric diagnosis over five years, but that sample consisted predominantly of people with moderate to severe TBI, not mTBI. It also reports a 34.0% first-year rate for mild TBI in a medical-file review, so the approximately 70% figure is not supported as an overall estimate for mTBI. (LLM, conf=0.90)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe Patient Health Questionnaire-9 has Cronbach alpha=0.9 (very high).
“Cronbach α=0.9 (very high) [110]”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [110] source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationStudies on TMS for suicidality are often limited by small sample sizes, inconsistencies in how suicidality is measured across studies, and contradictory findings.
“Studies are often limited by small sample sizes, inconsistencies in how suicidality is measured across studies, and contradictory findings [75,76].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 2 sources checked- cites [75] source
The Discussion (page not provided) identifies the small sample size as this study’s main limitation, and the Secondary Outcomes section reports a suicide-symptom result measured with the BSSI. The paper does not establish that TMS studies of suicidality often use inconsistent measures or have contradictory findings across studies; its small-sample limitation concerns this particular trial. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [76] source
The “Studies of TMS in Depressed Adolescents” section (page unavailable) describes only 112 participants across 10 publications, mostly case reports and open-label studies, supporting the small-sample limitation. The Safety section identifies suicidality as a concern but does not describe inconsistent measures of suicidality or contradictory findings across studies. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe Clinically Administered PTSD Scale for DSM-5 has interrater reliability K=0.78-1.0 (high) and discriminant validity rs=0.02-0.54 (moderate).
“Interrater reliability K=0.78-1.0 (high) discriminant validity: rs=0.02−0.54 (moderate) [100]”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [100] source
The Results sections on interrater reliability and convergent and discriminant validity report the stated CAPS-5 ranges: κ = .78 to 1.0 and rs = .02 to .54. However, the paper calls correlations of .33 to .54 moderate and those of .02 and .18 weak, so describing the entire discriminant-validity range as moderate overstates the finding. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale has Cronbach alpha=0.90 (very high).
“Cronbach α=0.90 (very high) [120]”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [120] source
The cited correction says only that a funding note was missing from the original article (p. 1, correction notice and Funding). A search of our copy for Cronbach’s alpha and 0.90 found no reliability estimate, so this correction does not verify the claimed value. (LLM, conf=0.76)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductcitationThe authors used the CONSORT checklist when writing their report.
“We used the CONSORT (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials) checklist when writing our report [86].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [86] source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe Delayed Discounting Task has test-retest reliability rtt=0.89 (very high).
“Test-retest reliability rtt=0.89 (very high) [122]”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [122] source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe Drug Use Disorders Identification Test has Cronbach alpha=0.93 (very high) and convergent validity r=0.76 (high).
“Cronbach α=0.93 (very high), convergent validity r=0.76 (high) [102,103]”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationStudies show that both TMS and iTBS appear safe and effective when administered to other anatomical sites in individuals with mTBI.
“as studies show that both TMS and iTBS appear safe and effective when administered to other anatomical sites in individuals with mTBI [23-26].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 4 sources checked- cites [23] source
The Abstract Results (page unavailable) support the safety of rTMS after concussion but say evidence for efficacy is limited. The Results section on PTSD (page unavailable) reports a statistically significant finding in a small concussion subgroup of a theta-burst trial, while the Discussion says all reviewed studies targeted the DLPFC. The paper therefore does not establish that both approaches are effective across other anatomical sites in people with mTBI. (LLM, conf=0.87)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [24] source
The Introduction (page not available) reports improvements after TMS stimulation of several brain regions in people with TBI. But the paper does not establish that both TMS and iTBS are safe and effective specifically in people with mild TBI; it discusses TBI more broadly and does not identify iTBS as a separately evaluated intervention. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [25] source
- cites [26] source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationiTBS can be applied to the frontal pole to target the VMPFC, and iTBS to the frontal pole is tolerable, with no more subjective pain than TMS.
“iTBS can be applied to the frontal pole to target the VMPFC, and iTBS to the frontal pole is tolerable, with no more subjective pain than TMS [63].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [63] source
The Methods report continuous theta-burst stimulation at the frontal pole (FP1), but intermittent theta-burst stimulation (iTBS) at F3, not the frontal pole. The Results and Conclusions find that ramped frontal-pole TMS was tolerable and not significantly more painful than DLPFC TMS; they do not establish this specifically for frontal-pole iTBS. The Introduction identifies the frontal pole as part of the medial prefrontal cortex but does not identify the stimulated site as the VMPFC. (LLM, conf=0.90)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationFrontal pole iTBS allows for more direct stimulation of the VMPFC and modulation of the limbic system.
“This approach allows for more direct stimulation of the VMPFC and modulation of the limbic system [63,82].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 2 sources checked- cites [63] source
The Introduction (page unavailable) identifies the frontal pole as part of the medial prefrontal cortex and discusses TMS modulation of frontal-pole activity. But the Methods (page unavailable) specify continuous theta-burst stimulation at the frontal pole and iTBS at F3, not the frontal pole. The paper does not establish more direct VMPFC stimulation or limbic-system modulation by frontal-pole iTBS. (LLM, conf=0.83)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [82] source
The Discussion (§§4.1 and 4.3; page unavailable) supports targeting the frontal pole more directly than the DLPFC and reports changes in connected salience- and reward-related regions. But the study tested continuous theta-burst stimulation (cTBS), not iTBS, and does not establish direct stimulation of the VMPFC specifically. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-5, Research Version has K>0.4 (above average) and sensitivity of identifying diagnosis >0.8 (good).
“K>0.4 (above average) sensitivity of identifying diagnosis >0.8 (good) [105]”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [105] source
The Results report sensitivity above 0.80 for all diagnoses and kappa above 0.4 for all diagnoses except anxiety disorders, for which kappa was 0.34. The study evaluated the SCID-5 Clinician Version, not the Research Version named in the claim. (LLM, conf=0.90)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe UPPS-P Negative Urgency subscale has Cronbach alpha=0.91 (very high).
“Cronbach α=0.91 (very high) [41,97]”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites [41] source
The Method > Measures section describes the four-trait UPPS scale and gives a mean and standard deviation for Negative Urgency, but no Cronbach alpha. Searches for “0.91,” “Cronbach alpha,” and Negative Urgency reliability found no passage supporting the claimed value; the copy also identifies the instrument used as UPPS, not UPPS-P. Page numbers were unavailable. (LLM, conf=0.75)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [97] source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe right frontal pole anatomical location is easily identifiable using anatomical landmarks and correlates with electrode FP2 on a 10-20 EEG, a region overlapping with the right VMPFC.
“The anatomical location is easily identifiable using anatomical landmarks and correlates with electrode frontal polar cortex (FP; FP2) on a 10 to 20 electroencephalogram, a region overlapping with the right VMPFC [22,63,82].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim3 of 3 sources checked- cites [22] source
The Materials and Methods section describes TMS delivered primarily to the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, but does not describe how to locate the right frontal pole. Searches for FP2, VMPFC, and anatomical landmarks found no passage establishing the claimed EEG correspondence or overlap. (LLM, conf=0.76)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [63] source
The Introduction identifies the frontal pole as part of the medial prefrontal cortex, and the Methods use a 10–20 EEG position to target it. But the Methods specify FP1, not the claimed right-sided FP2; the paper does not say the location is easily identified by anatomical landmarks or that it overlaps the right VMPFC. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [82] source
The Methods (§2.3.1.1, page unavailable) support locating a frontal-pole stimulation site with anatomical landmarks and the 10–20 EEG system. But the paper places the coil at Fp1, approximating the left frontal pole—not FP2 on the right—and does not establish overlap with the right VMPFC. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe Beck Suicide Scale has Cronbach alpha=0.89 (very high) and strong predictive validity.
“Cronbach α=0.89 (very high), strong predictive validity [114]”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [114] source
The Internal consistency section reports α=0.89 for the SSI-W among 1,764 psychiatric outpatients with suicidal ideation, not for the full sample or the SSI-C. The Introduction and Discussion report that the SSI-W predicted subsequent suicide in an earlier outpatient study, supporting predictive validity for that version. The claim omits these qualifications and presents both properties as applying to the Beck Suicide Scale generally. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationMany patients will require multiple medication trials and may take months to experience any symptomatic improvement.
“Furthermore, many patients will require multiple medication trials and may take months to experience any symptomatic improvement [36].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [36] source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationMore than 400,000 new TBI diagnoses have occurred among US service members since the beginning of operations Enduring Freedom, Iraqi Freedom, and New Dawn, of which more than 80% are mild traumatic brain injury.
“These statistics are particularly concerning given that there have been >400,000 new TBI diagnoses among US service members since the beginning of operations Enduring Freedom, Iraqi Freedom, and New Dawn, of which >80% are mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) [3].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [3] DOD TBI worldwide numbersHealth.mil2024-04-29https://health.mil/Military-Health-Topics/Centers-of-Excellence/Traumatic-Brain-Injury-Center-of-Excellence/DOD-TBI-Worldwide-Numbers
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationNegative urgency impulsivity is associated with excessive agitation, irritability, low moods, and a greater tendency for aggression toward oneself or others immediately following a negative event.
“It is associated with excessive agitation, irritability, low moods, and a greater tendency for aggression toward oneself or others immediately following a negative event [40].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [40] source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn a large noninferiority study comparing iTBS and TMS, patients with treatment-resistant depression show similar safety and adverse event profiles and exhibit improvements in depressive symptoms to both interventions.
“In a large, noninferiority study comparing iTBS and TMS, patients with treatment-resistant depression show similar safety and adverse event (AE) profiles and exhibit improvements in their depressive symptoms to both interventions [29].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [29] source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationComorbid conditions with mTBI include substance use disorders, PTSD, and depression.
“Comorbid conditions include substance use disorders, PTSD, and depression [66-68].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningTBI, SI, impulsivity, and functional deficits are intertwined and should be considered in tandem.
“Given that TBI and impulsivity are both (1) independent risk factors for developing SI and (2) associated with impaired social and community functioning, it appears that TBI, SI, impulsivity, and functional deficits are intertwined and should be considered in tandem.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationVeterans with mTBI make up the majority, more than 80%, of the veteran population with TBI in the United States.
“Veterans with mTBI make up the majority (>80%) of the veteran population with TBI in the United States [3].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [3] DOD TBI worldwide numbersHealth.mil2024-04-29https://health.mil/Military-Health-Topics/Centers-of-Excellence/Traumatic-Brain-Injury-Center-of-Excellence/DOD-TBI-Worldwide-Numbers
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationCharacteristics of negative urgency impulsivity can reduce quality of life and worsen community and social functioning, predisposing individuals to SI and SAs.
“These characteristics of negative urgency impulsivity can reduce the quality of life and worsen community and social functioning, predisposing individuals to SI and SAs (Figure 1) [46].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [46] Silver, JM, 2011, Textbook of Traumatic Brain Injury. 2nd edition
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationTMS has demonstrated efficacy in the treatment of depression in large, multisite, sham-controlled trials.
“Seminal studies by George et al [19] demonstrated the efficacy of TMS in the treatment of depression in large, multisite sham-controlled trials.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [19] source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThis amount of iTBS stimulation appears to be well tolerated and shows a good effect on depressive symptoms, even in a treatment-refractory group.
“This amount of stimulation appears to be well tolerated and shows a good effect on depressive symptoms, even in a treatment-refractory group [58].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [58] source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationiTBS was first shown to treat depression in 2009 in a study by Holzer and Padberg.
“A second-generation form of TMS, intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS), was first shown to treat depression in 2009 in a study by Holzer and Padberg [28].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [28] source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationVeterans die by suicide at almost double the rate of civilians in the United States.
“Veterans die by suicide at almost double the rate of civilians in the United States [1].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [1] Ramchand, R, 2022, Rand Health Q
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationTMS was subsequently approved by the FDA to treat treatment-resistant depression in 2008.
“TMS was subsequently approved by the FDA to treat treatment-resistant depression in 2008 [53-55].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [53] Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) systems - class II special controls guidance for industry and FDA staffFood and Drug Administration, USA2024-04-29https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/guidance-documents-medical-devices-and-radiation-emitting-products/repetitive-transcranial-magnetic-stimulation-rtms-systems-class-ii-special-controls-guidance
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [54] FDA permits marketing of transcranial magnetic stimulation for treatment of obsessive-compulsive disorderFood and Drug Administration, USA20182024-04-29https://www.fda.gov/news-events/press-announcements/fda-permits-marketing-transcranial-magnetic-stimulation-treatment-obsessive-compulsive-disorder
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [55] Coverage guidance for TMS for OCDClinical TMS Society2024-04-29https://www.clinicaltmssociety.org/sites/default/files/ctmss_recommended_ocd_coverage_policy_0.pdf
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationBetween 16% and 20% of all operations Enduring Freedom, Iraqi Freedom, and New Dawn veterans have a history of mTBI, and among them, up to 22% report suicidal ideation.
“Overall, between 16% and 20% of all operations Enduring Freedom, Iraqi Freedom, and New Dawn veterans have a history of mTBI, and among them, up to 22% report suicidal ideation (SI) [4].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [4] source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationiTBS is a second-generation FDA-approved form of TMS designed to mimic endogenous brain rhythms with the added benefit of markedly reduced treatment time.
“iTBS is a second-generation FDA-approved form of TMS designed to mimic endogenous brain rhythms with the added benefit of markedly reduced treatment time [28,56].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductcitationTo ensure tolerability, stimulation intensity will begin at 60% to 70% of the motor threshold and will slowly increase as the patient tolerates to 110% of the patient's motor threshold over the first few treatment sessions.
“To ensure that the participants can tolerate the treatment, stimulation intensity will begin at 60% to 70% of the MT intensity and will slowly increase as the patient tolerates to 110% of the patient’s MT intensity over the first few treatment sessions [42].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [42] source
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductreasoningFor safety, the study will exclude persons with contraindications to TMS or MRI because of increased risk of adverse events.
“For safety, we will exclude persons with contraindications to TMS or MRI because of increased risk of AEs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenThe study protocol was reviewed and approved by the Edward Hines, Jr. VA Hospital Institutional Review Board and the University of Illinois, Chicago Institutional Review Board.
“The study protocol was reviewed and approved by the Edward Hines, Jr. VA Hospital Institutional Review Board (Hines IRB number 1716074) and the University of Illinois, Chicago Institutional Review Board.”
- Also stated in: § Results · plain
“This study protocol was approved by the Edward Hines, Jr. VA Hospital Institutional Review Board (Hines IRB number 14-003).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Also stated in: § Results · plain
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe Alcohol Use Disorder Identification Test has AUROC=0.891 (high).
“AUROCk=0.891 (high) [101]”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [101] source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 has Cronbach alpha=0.94 (very high) and test-retest reliability rtt=0.82 (high).
“Cronbach α=0.94 (very high) and test-retest reliability (rtt=0.82) (high) [116]”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [116] source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe Neurobehavioral Symptom Inventory has Cronbach alpha=0.81-0.96 (very high).
“Cronbach α=0.81-0.96 (very high) [98]”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [98] source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe Ohio State TBI Identification Method has interrater reliability greater than 90% (very high).
“Interrater reliability >90% (very high) [92]”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [92] source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenA single unblinded study team member will determine which participants are randomly placed in the active or sham groups.
“A single unblinded study team member will determine which participants are randomly placed in the active or sham groups.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningBy inducing modulation and neuroplasticity to the VMPFC and limbic system, iTBS at the frontal pole offers a promising means of mitigating impulsive behaviors and decreasing SI by increasing connectivity and undoing limbic damage caused by mTBI.
“By inducing modulation and neuroplasticity to the VMPFC and limbic system, iTBS at the frontal pole offers a promising means of mitigating impulsive behaviors and decreasing SI by increasing connectivity and undoing limbic damage caused by mTBI.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenAny seizure will result in stopping the intervention and withdrawal from the study.
“Any seizure will result in stopping the intervention and withdrawal from the study.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenThe study will collect 10 validated, psychometric, quantitative outcome measures before, during, and after the intervention.
“We will collect 10 validated, psychometric, quantitative outcome measures before, during, and after the intervention.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe Social and Occupational Functioning Assessment Scale has weighted K=0.95 (very high).
“Weighted K=0.95 (very high) [107]”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [107] source
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductreasoningThe study will exclude participants whose SI is active, with intent and plan, as they require emergency psychiatric intervention.
“We will also exclude participants whose SI is active, with intent and plan, as they require emergency psychiatric intervention.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale has internal validity a=0.95 and test-retest reliability rtt=0.90-1.0 (very high).
“Internal validity a=0.95 and test-retest reliability rtt=0.90-1.0 (very high) [93,94]”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenThe proposed study is a pilot, prospective, randomized, double-blinded, sham-controlled study to develop a frontal pole iTBS intervention.
“The proposed study is a pilot, prospective, randomized, double-blinded, sham-controlled study to develop a frontal pole iTBS intervention.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenPain and tolerability measures will be completed at the end of every session to assess daily pain and session tolerability.
“Pain and tolerability measures will be completed at the end of every session to assess daily pain and session tolerability.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenAll iTBS sessions will be videotaped to monitor for safety and allow for review in case of an adverse event.
“All iTBS sessions will be videotaped to monitor for safety and allow for review in case of an AE.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Study design and conductreasoningmTBI must have occurred at least 1 year before enrollment to ensure that the injury has stabilized.
“mTBI must have occurred at least 1 year before enrollment to ensure that the injury has stabilized.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenResearch staff will complete a TMS safety rating scale before and after every iTBS session to assess for changes from baseline for vital signs, sleep duration, fatigue level, recent seizures, and tinnitus.
“Research staff will complete a TMS safety rating scale before and after every iTBS session to assess for changes from baseline for vital signs, sleep duration, fatigue level, recent seizures, and tinnitus.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenParticipants will be clinically monitored for seizure by trained research staff.
“Participants will be clinically monitored for seizure by trained research staff.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe Veteran's RAND has Cronbach alpha=0.78-0.93 depending on the domain (high-very high).
“Cronbach α=0.78-0.93 depending on the domain (high-very high) [112]”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [112] 36-item short form survey (SF-36) scoring instructionsRAND Corporation2024-07-16https://www.rand.org/health-care/surveys_tools/mos/36-item-short-form/scoring.html
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenThis study does not select targets based on resting-state data.
“This study does not select targets based on resting-state data; however, in collecting these data in tandem using neuronavigation, we can potentially target more specific sites in the future.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductreasoningTo enhance generalizability, the study will include veterans regardless of previous combat or deployment experience.
“To enhance generalizability, we will include veterans regardless of previous combat or deployment experience.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenVariability in baseline characteristics of the patient population may impact the study findings.
“Variability in the baseline characteristics of the patient population (ie, co-occurring psychiatric and somatic conditions, coadministration of other medications, etc) that are being studied in detail in this project may impact our findings.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenAll analyses will be corrected for multiple comparisons using false-discovery rate correction.
“All analyses will be corrected for multiple comparisons using false-discovery rate correction.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology, Self-Report has Cronbach alpha=0.94 (very high) and test-retest reliability rtt=0.82 (high).
“Cronbach α=0.94 (very high) and test-retest reliability rtt=0.82 (high) [118]”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [118] source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductcitationIn developing this protocol, the authors referenced the SPIRIT guidelines.
“In developing this protocol, we referenced the SPIRIT (Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials) guidelines [85].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [85] source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenThe analysis will adjust for a priori covariates including age, sex, and baseline psychiatric diagnoses.
“We will adjust for a priori covariates, including age, sex, and baseline psychiatric diagnoses.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenThe study is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05647044).
“The study is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05647044).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenThe study is designed in accordance with the ethical standards of the US VA Office of Research and Development, based on those from the Declaration of Helsinki, the Belmont Report, US Common Rule and Regulations from the Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences.
“This study is designed in accordance with the ethical standards of the US VA Office of Research and Development, based on those from the Declaration of Helsinki, the Belmont Report, US Common Rule and Regulations from the Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningThe sham stimulation looks, sounds, and feels like active stimulation.
“Thus, the sham stimulation looks, sounds, and feels like active stimulation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe Buss-Perry Aggressiveness Scale has test-retest reliability rtt=0.80 (high) and Cronbach alpha=0.68-0.8 for each subscale (moderate-high).
“Test-retest reliability rtt=0.80 (high), Cronbach α=0.68-0.8 for each subscale (moderate-high) [108]”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [108] source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenThe sham coil and scalp electrodes will be placed in the same location for all participants and will mimic the sensation produced by the active coil but will not alter brain physiology.
“The sham coil and scalp electrodes will be placed in the same location for all participants and will mimic the sensation produced by the active coil but will not alter brain physiology.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenA thorough chart review will be completed to cross-reference current medications with study eligibility criteria to identify antiepileptics or medications that could lower the seizure threshold.
“A thorough chart review will be completed to cross-reference current medications with study eligibility criteria to identify antiepileptics or medications that could lower the seizure threshold.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe Stroop Color & Word Test has reliability estimates ranging from a=0.83 to a=0.91 and test-retest reliability ranging from rtt=0.79 to rtt=0.97 (all high-very high).
“Reliability estimates range from a=0.83 to a=0.91 and test-retest reliability ranges from rtt=0.79 to rtt=0.97 (all high-very high) [124]”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [124] source
May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenThe small sample size reduces the study power, which may limit the detection of statistically significant outcome differences.
“The small sample size reduces the study power, which may limit the detection of statistically significant outcome differences.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductreasoningThe active and sham iTBS coils are visually identical.
“The coil is identical visually for the sham and active conditions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductreasoningThe Localite neuronavigation system and an MRI instrument marker will be used at every iTBS session to ensure precise and repeatable coil positioning over the frontal pole FP2 site.
“To ensure precise and repeatable coil positioning over the frontal pole FP2 site, the Localite (neuronavigation) system and an MRI instrument marker will be used at every iTBS session.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningThe total sample size will be 56 with 28 in the active iTBS group and 28 in the sham iTBS group.
“Thus, our total sample size will be 56 with 28 in the active iTBS group and 28 in the sham iTBS group.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductreasoningVeterans and researchers will wear headphones connected to a noise generator during treatment to hear active iTBS for both conditions, thereby maintaining the blind.
“Veterans and researchers will wear headphones connected to the noise generator during treatment to hear active iTBS for both conditions, thereby maintaining the blind.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
The paper relies on this without support.
No established treatment approach has used VMPFC iTBS to improve social and occupational functioning, SI, and negative urgency impulsivity among individuals with mTBI and comorbid mental illness.
“To the best of our knowledge, no established treatment approach has used VMPFC iTBS to improve social and occupational functioning, SI, and negative urgency impulsivity among individuals with mTBI and comorbid mental illness.”
The paper relies on this without support.
No neuroimaging evidence implicates specific brain regions in mTBI-related impulsivity and SI.
“To the best of our knowledge, no neuroimaging evidence implicates specific brain regions in mTBI-related impulsivity and SI.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Evidence is scarce to directly support biological treatments for SI, impulsivity, and functional deficits following mTBI.
“However, the evidence is scarce to directly support biological treatments for SI, impulsivity, and functional deficits following mTBI.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
Equal variance can be assumed between the test and control groups.
“We will assume equal variance between test and control groups [128].”
The authors state this as an assumption.
A normal distribution can be assumed for the neuroimaging connectivity data.
“We will assume a normal distribution and use Fisher’s Z test to compare active-iTBS and sham-iTBS groups, both before and after treatment [133].”
The paper relies on this without support.
There are no widely established treatments for poorer functional outcomes, suicidality, or impulsivity that occur in the context of mTBI.
“First, there are no widely established treatments for poorer functional outcomes, suicidality, or impulsivity that occur in the context of mTBI.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Compared with traditional pharmacological and behavioral approaches, iTBS has a reduced latency to treatment response, which could be lifesaving among individuals with suicidal ideation.
“Compared with traditional pharmacological and behavioral approaches, iTBS has a reduced latency to treatment response, which could be lifesaving among individuals with SI.”
The paper relies on this without support.
This protocol represents the first pilot randomized controlled trial for frontal pole iTBS for mTBI, negative urgency impulsivity, and suicidality.
“This novel protocol represents the first pilot RCT for frontal pole iTBS for mTBI, negative urgency impulsivity, and suicidality.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The study uses an established FDA-approved device readily available in both VA and civilian health care systems throughout the United States.
“First, the study uses an established FDA-approved device readily available in both VA and civilian health care systems throughout the United States.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Our approach differs from previous studies that primarily focused on improving suicidal ideation via the treatment of depressive symptoms.
“Our approach also differs from previous studies that primarily focused on improving SI via the treatment of depressive symptoms.”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Alcohol screening instrument differs between the text and table
MajorThe screening description specifies the Alcohol Use Disorder Identification Test-Consumption Questions, whereas Table 1 specifies a 10-item Alcohol Use Disorder Identification Test.
“the Alcohol Use Disorder Identification Test-Consumption Questions to determine if an alcohol use disorder is present [101]”
“| | Alcohol Use Disorder Identification Test [101] (participant self-administered) | Active alcohol use disorder, eligibility determination | 10-item questionnaire about the frequency and amount of alcohol used |”
Different stimulation coils are specified for the intervention
MajorThe experimental-intervention section specifies C-B60 active and placebo coils, but the blinding procedures specify a B65 A/P coil for active and sham iTBS.
“Our 9-minute iTBS protocol will be delivered using the MagVenture Mag-Pro X100 with the MagOption stimulator, including active and placebo coils (C-B60 Butterfly coils).”
“Blinding procedures for active and sham iTBS will be delivered with the MagProX100 with MagOption stimulator and Magpro Cool Coil B65 A/P (MagVenture), which can be switched to active or sham.”
Two different IRB numbers are given for the study protocol
MinorThe abstract identifies 14-003 as the protocol's Hines IRB number, while the ethics section identifies 1716074. The recruitment section separately identifies 14-003 as the number for a TBI Data Repository.
“This study protocol was approved by the Edward Hines, Jr. VA Hospital Institutional Review Board (Hines IRB number 14-003).”
“The study protocol was reviewed and approved by the Edward Hines, Jr. VA Hospital Institutional Review Board (Hines IRB number 1716074) and the University of Illinois, Chicago Institutional Review Board.”
The stated train schedule does not deliver 1800 pulses
MinorAt one 2-second train every 10 seconds, 570 seconds allows 57 trains. Each train contains ten 3-pulse bursts at 200-millisecond intervals, yielding 1710 pulses rather than the stated 1800.
“iTBS parameters include 3 pulses of stimulation at 50 Hz, repeated every 200 miliseconds.”
“A 2-second train of TBS is repeated every 10 seconds for a total of 570 seconds, equaling a total of 1800 pulses delivered over 9 minutes.”
Cites
The PHQ-9: Validity of a brief depression severity measure
Kroenke, K., Spitzer, R. L., & Williams, J. B. W. (2001) · Journal of General Internal Medicine · doi:10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.016009606.x · Cited by 44,910 · see citing works
Desikan, R. S., Ségonne, F., Fischl, B., Quinn, B. T., Dickerson, B. C., Blacker, D., Buckner, R. L., Dale, A. M., Maguire, R. P., Hyman, B. T., et al. (2006) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.01.021 · Cited by 13,324 · see citing works
CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials
Schulz, K. F., Altman, D. G., Moher, D., & for the CONSORT Group (2010) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.c332 · Cited by 9,329 · see citing works
SPIRIT 2013 Statement: Defining Standard Protocol Items for Clinical Trials
Chan, A.-W., Tetzlaff, J. M., Altman, D. G., Laupacis, A., Gøtzsche, P. C., Krleža-Jerić, K., Hróbjartsson, A., Mann, H., Dickersin, K., Berlin, J. A., et al. (2013) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-158-3-201302050-00583 · Cited by 7,363 · see citing works
Bush, K. (1998) · Archives of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/archinte.158.16.1789 · Cited by 6,196 · see citing works
Blevins, C. A., Weathers, F. W., Davis, M. T., Witte, T. K., & Domino, J. L. (2015) · Journal of Traumatic Stress · doi:10.1002/jts.22059 · Cited by 5,233 · see citing works
Posner, K., Brown, G. K., Stanley, B., Brent, D. A., Yershova, K. V., Oquendo, M. A., Currier, G. W., Melvin, G. A., Greenhill, L., Shen, S., et al. (2011) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.2011.10111704 · Cited by 5,157 · cited 3× · see citing works
“Recent SI (within the past 3 months) will be defined as a score of ≥ 1 on the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale [89].”
Influential<i>Conn</i> : A Functional Connectivity Toolbox for Correlated and Anticorrelated Brain Networks
Whitfield-Gabrieli, S., & Nieto-Castanon, A. (2012) · Brain Connectivity · doi:10.1089/brain.2012.0073 · Cited by 4,885 · see citing works
Buss, A. H., & Perry, M. (1992) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.63.3.452 · Cited by 4,693 · see citing works
NON-INVASIVE MAGNETIC STIMULATION OF HUMAN MOTOR CORTEX
Barker, A. T., Jalinous, R., & Freeston, I. L. (1985) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(85)92413-4 · Cited by 4,466 · see citing works
Whiteside, S. P., & Lynam, D. R. (2001) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/s0191-8869(00)00064-7 · Cited by 4,123 · see citing works
Assessment of suicidal intention: The Scale for Suicide Ideation.
Beck, A. T., Kovacs, M., & Weissman, A. (1979) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-006x.47.2.343 · Cited by 3,419 · see citing works
The estimation of a preference-based measure of health from the SF-36.
Brazier, J., Roberts, J., & Deverill, M. (2002) · Journal of Health Economics · doi:10.1016/s0167-6296(01)00130-8 · Cited by 3,164 · see citing works
Mild traumatic brain injury in U.S. soldiers returning from Iraq
Hoge, C. W., McGurk, D., Thomas, J. L., Cox, A. L., Engel, C. C., & Castro, C. A. (2008) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa072972 · Cited by 2,775 · see citing works
Bovin, M. J., Marx, B. P., Weathers, F. W., Gallagher, M. W., Rodriguez, P., Schnurr, P. P., & Keane, T. M. (2016) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037/pas0000254 · Cited by 2,532 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…PTSD diagnosis 20 items corresponding to DSM-5 criteria for PTSD symptoms (eg, hypervigi-lance, flashbacks) PTSD symptoms PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 [115] (participant self-administered) Cronbach α =0.94 (very high) and test-retest reliability r tt= 0.82 (high) [118] Scale of 0-3, 0=not present,…”
InfluentialLefaucheur, J.-P., Aleman, A., Baeken, C., Benninger, D. H., Brunelin, J., Di Lazzaro, V., Filipović, S. R., Grefkes, C., Hasan, A., Hummel, F. C., et al. (2020) · Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2019.11.002 · Cited by 2,382 · see citing works
O’Reardon, J. P., Solvason, H. B., Janicak, P. G., Sampson, S., Isenberg, K. E., Nahas, Z., McDonald, W. M., Avery, D., Fitzgerald, P. B., Loo, C., et al. (2007) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2007.01.018 · Cited by 1,910 · see citing works
Weathers, F. W., Bovin, M. J., Lee, D. J., Sloan, D. M., Schnurr, P. P., Kaloupek, D. G., Keane, T. M., & Marx, B. P. (2018) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037/pas0000486 · Cited by 1,799 · see citing works
The stroop color and word test
Scarpina, F., & Tagini, S. (2017) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00557 · Cited by 1,661 · see citing works
Rossi, S., Antal, A., Bestmann, S., Bikson, M., Brewer, C., Brockmöller, J., Carpenter, L. L., Cincotta, M., Chen, R., Daskalakis, J. D., et al. (2021) · Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2020.10.003 · Cited by 1,573 · see citing works
Revising axis V for DSM-IV: a review of measures of social functioning
Goldman, H. H., Skodol, A. E., & Lave, T. R. (1992) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/ajp.149.9.1148 · Cited by 1,408 · see citing works
Blumberger, D. M., Vila-Rodriguez, F., Thorpe, K. E., Feffer, K., Noda, Y., Giacobbe, P., Knyahnytska, Y., Kennedy, S. H., Lam, R. W., Daskalakis, Z. J., et al. (2018) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(18)30295-2 · Cited by 1,363 · see citing works
Fox, M. D., Buckner, R. L., White, M. P., Greicius, M. D., & Pascual-Leone, A. (2012) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2012.04.028 · Cited by 1,270 · see citing works
Morosini, P. L., Magliano, L., Brambilla, L., Ugolini, S., & Pioli, R. (2000) · PubMed · Cited by 1,168 · see citing works
Emotion-based dispositions to rash action: positive and negative urgency
Cyders, M. A., & Smith, G. T. (2008) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/a0013341 · Cited by 1,136 · see citing works
Morosini, P. L., Magliano, L., Brambilla, L., Ugolini, S., & Pioli, R. (2000) · Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica · doi:10.1034/j.1600-0447.2000.101004323.x · Cited by 1,097 · see citing works
George, M. S., Lisanby, S. H., Avery, D., McDonald, W. M., Durkalski, V., Pavlicova, M., Anderson, B., Nahas, Z., Bulow, P., Zarkowski, P., et al. (2010) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2010.46 · Cited by 1,092 · see citing works
Berman, A. H., Bergman, H., Palmstierna, T., & Schlyter, F. (2005) · European Addiction Research · doi:10.1159/000081413 · Cited by 977 · see citing works
TRIVEDI, M. H., RUSH, A. J., IBRAHIM, H. M., CARMODY, T. J., BIGGS, M. M., SUPPES, T., CRISMON, M. L., SHORES-WILSON, K., TOPRAC, M. G., DENNEHY, E. B., et al. (2004) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291703001107 · Cited by 968 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…present, 3=severe symptoms, higher score=more severe symptoms 30 items assessing DSM-5 depressive symptoms Depression symptoms Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology, Self-Report [117] (participant self-administered) Cronbach α =0.90 (very high) [120] Scale of 1-5, 1=almost never, 5=almost always.”
InfluentialBasic principles of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and repetitive TMS (rTMS)
Klomjai, W., Katz, R., & Lackmy‐Vallée, A. (2015) · Annals of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.rehab.2015.05.005 · Cited by 873 · see citing works
Initial Reliability and Validity of the Ohio State University TBI Identification Method
Corrigan, J. D., & Bogner, J. (2007) · Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation · doi:10.1097/01.htr.0000300227.67748.77 · Cited by 816 · see citing works
Frontal lobe injuries, violence, and aggression: A report of the Vietnam Head Injury Study
Grafman, J., Schwab, K., Warden, D., Pridgen, A., Brown, H. R., & Salazar, A. M. (1996) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.46.5.1231 · Cited by 696 · see citing works
Biomarkers of mild traumatic brain injury in cerebrospinal fluid and blood
Zetterberg, H., Smith, D. H., & Blennow, K. (2013) · Nature Reviews Neurology · doi:10.1038/nrneurol.2013.9 · Cited by 601 · see citing works
Improving Suicide Prevention Through Evidence-Based Strategies: A Systematic Review
Mann, J. J., Michel, C. A., & Auerbach, R. P. (2021) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.2020.20060864 · Cited by 577 · see citing works
Yu, Z., Guindani, M., Grieco, S. F., Chen, L., Holmes, T. C., & Xu, X. (2022) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2021.10.030 · Cited by 563 · see citing works
Psychometric characteristics of the Scale for Suicide Ideation with psychiatric outpatients
Beck, A. T., Brown, G. K., & Steer, R. A. (1997) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/s0005-7967(97)00073-9 · Cited by 538 · see citing works
Cross-Cultural Comparisons of Discounting Delayed and Probabilistic Rewards
Du, W., Green, L., & Myerson, J. (2002) · The Psychological Record · doi:10.1007/bf03395199 · Cited by 514 · see citing works
Suicidal Thoughts and Behaviors Among Adults Aged ≥18 Years — United States, 2015–2019
Ivey-Stephenson, A. Z., Crosby, A. E., Hoenig, J. M., Gyawali, S., Park-Lee, E., & Hedden, S. L. (2022) · MMWR. Surveillance Summaries · doi:10.15585/mmwr.ss7101a1 · Cited by 512 · see citing works
Axis I Psychopathology in Individuals with Traumatic Brain Injury
Hibbard, M. R., Uysal, S., Kepler, K., Bogdany, J., & Silver, J. (1998) · Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation · doi:10.1097/00001199-199808000-00003 · Cited by 491 · see citing works
Hallion, L. S., Steinman, S. A., Tolin, D. F., & Diefenbach, G. J. (2018) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00539 · Cited by 464 · see citing works
Textbook of Traumatic Brain Injury
Silver, J., McAllister, T. W., & Yudofsky, S. C. (2011) · American Psychiatric Association Publishing eBooks · doi:10.1176/appi.books.9781585624201 · Cited by 348 · see citing works
Li, C.-T., Chen, M.-H., Juan, C.-H., Huang, H.-H., Chen, L.-F., Hsieh, J.-C., Tu, P.-C., Bai, Y.-M., Tsai, S.-J., Lee, Y.-C., et al. (2014) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awu109 · Cited by 328 · see citing works
Simply longer is not better: reversal of theta burst after-effect with prolonged stimulation
Gamboa, O. L., Antal, A., Moliadze, V., & Paulus, W. (2010) · Experimental Brain Research · doi:10.1007/s00221-010-2293-4 · Cited by 318 · see citing works
Larson, J., & Munkácsy, E. (2015) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2014.10.034 · Cited by 285 · see citing works
Psychosocial and Emotional Outcomes 10 Years Following Traumatic Brain Injury
Draper, K., Ponsford, J., & Schönberger, M. (2007) · Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation · doi:10.1097/01.htr.0000290972.63753.a7 · Cited by 279 · see citing works
Nettekoven, C., Volz, L. J., Kutscha, M., Pool, E.-M., Rehme, A. K., Eickhoff, S. B., Fink, G. R., & Grefkes, C. (2014) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.4993-13.2014 · Cited by 264 · see citing works
Philip, N. S., Barredo, J., Wout‐Frank, M. V. ‘., Tyrka, A. R., Price, L. H., & Carpenter, L. L. (2017) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2017.07.021 · Cited by 254 · see citing works
Self-citationComparison of two self-rating scales to detect depression: HADS and PHQ-9
Hansson, M., Chotai, J., Nordstöm, A., & Bodlund, O. (2009) · British Journal of General Practice · doi:10.3399/bjgp09x454070 · Cited by 246 · see citing works
Morey, R. A., Haswell, C. C., Hooper, S. R., & De Bellis, M. D. (2016) · Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1038/npp.2015.205 · Cited by 237 · see citing works
Duprat, R., Desmyter, S., Rudi, D. R., van Heeringen, K., Van den Abbeele, D., Tandt, H., Bakic, J., Pourtois, G., Dedoncker, J., Vervaet, M., et al. (2016) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2016.04.015 · Cited by 216 · see citing works
Weafer, J., Baggott, M. J., & de Wit, H. (2013) · Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1037/a0033659 · Cited by 214 · see citing works
Self-citationNeural circuitry of impaired emotion regulation in substance use disorders
Wilcox, C. E., Pommy, J. M., & Adinoff, B. (2016) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.2015.15060710 · Cited by 213 · see citing works
Huang, Y.-Z., & Rothwell, J. C. (2004) · Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2003.12.026 · Cited by 197 · see citing works
Bryan, C. J., & Clemans, T. A. (2013) · JAMA Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2013.1093 · Cited by 195 · see citing works
George, M. S., Raman, R., Benedek, D. M., Pelic, C. G., Grammer, G. G., Stokes, K. T., Schmidt, M., Spiegel, C., DeAlmeida, N., Beaver, K. L., et al. (2014) · Brain Stimulation · doi:10.1016/j.brs.2014.03.006 · Cited by 193 · see citing works
Theta-Burst Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder
Philip, N. S., Barredo, J., Aiken, E., Larson, V., Jones, R. N., Shea, M. T., Greenberg, B. D., & van ’t Wout-Frank, M. (2019) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.2019.18101160 · Cited by 183 · see citing works
Self-citationLynam, D. R., Miller, J. D., Miller, D. J., Bornovalova, M. A., & Lejuez, C. W. (2011) · Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment · doi:10.1037/a0019978 · Cited by 176 · see citing works
Epidemiology and Natural History of Psychiatric Disorders After TBI
Ponsford, J., Alway, Y., & Gould, K. R. (2018) · The Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences · doi:10.1176/appi.neuropsych.18040093 · Cited by 156 · see citing works
Neuropsychological profiling of impulsivity and compulsivity in cocaine dependent individuals
Fernández-Serrano, M. J., Perales, J. C., Moreno-López, L., Pérez-Garcı́a, M., & Verdejo‐García, A. (2011) · Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1007/s00213-011-2485-z · Cited by 141 · see citing works
Emergency Department Evaluation of Traumatic Brain Injury in the United States, 2009–2010
Korley, F. K., Kelen, G. D., Jones, C. M. C., & Diaz-Arrastia, R. R. (2015) · Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation · doi:10.1097/htr.0000000000000187 · Cited by 140 · see citing works
Batty, G. D., Kivimäki, M., Bell, S., Gale, C. R., Shipley, M., Whitley, E., & Gunnell, D. (2018) · Translational Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/s41398-017-0072-8 · Cited by 136 · see citing works
Costs of Nonfatal Traumatic Brain Injury in the United States, 2016
Miller, G. F., DePadilla, L. M., & Xu, L. (2021) · Medical Care · doi:10.1097/mlr.0000000000001511 · Cited by 135 · see citing works
Shabani, A., Masoumian, S., Zamirinejad, S., Hejri, M., Pirmorad, T., & Yaghmaeezadeh, H. (2021) · Brain and Behavior · doi:10.1002/brb3.1894 · Cited by 133 · see citing works
Hanlon, C. A., Dowdle, L. T., Correia, B., Mithoefer, O., Kearney-Ramos, T., Lench, D., Griffin, M., Anton, R. F., & George, M. S. (2017) · Drug and Alcohol Dependence · doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2017.03.039 · Cited by 125 · see citing works
Self-citationDing, Y., Lawrence, N., Olié, E., Cyprien, F., le Bars, E., Bonafé, A., Phillips, M. L., Courtet, P., & Jollant, F. (2015) · Translational Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/tp.2015.1 · Cited by 124 · see citing works
Impact of repetitive theta burst stimulation on motor cortex excitability
Gamboa, O. L., Antal, A., Laczo, B., Moliadze, V., Nitsche, M. A., & Paulus, W. (2011) · Brain Stimulation · doi:10.1016/j.brs.2010.09.008 · Cited by 123 · see citing works
Treatment-Resistant Depression: Approaches to Treatment
Kverno, K. S., & Mangano, E. (2021) · Journal of Psychosocial Nursing and Mental Health Services · doi:10.3928/02793695-20210816-01 · Cited by 121 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Furthermore, many patients will require multiple medication trials and may take months to experience any symptomatic improvement [36].”
de Melo, M. B., Daldegan‐Bueno, D., Menezes Oliveira, M. G., & de Souza, A. L. (2022) · European Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1111/ejn.15858 · Cited by 116 · see citing works
Gaynes, B. N., Rush, A. J., Trivedi, M. H., Wisniewski, S. R., Balasubramani, G. K., McGrath, P. J., Thase, M. E., Klinkman, M., Nierenberg, A. A., Yates, W. R., et al. (2008) · Journal of General Internal Medicine · doi:10.1007/s11606-008-0522-3 · Cited by 97 · see citing works
Madan, A., Frueh, B. C., Allen, J. G., Ellis, T. E., Rufino, K. A., Oldham, J. M., & Fowler, J. C. (2016) · The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry · doi:10.4088/jcp.15m10069 · Cited by 96 · cited 1× · see citing works
“[89] (rater administered) r tt= 0.90-1.0 ( very high) [93,94] or no; lethality: 0-2, higher scores=more severe of SI, presence of suicidal behaviors, lethality of behaviors Cronbach α =0.91 (very high) [41,97] 4-point Likert scale questions, scored by each trait, some reverse-coded.”
InfluentialGosnell, S. N., Velasquez, K. M., Molfese, D. L., Molfese, P. J., Madan, A., Fowler, J. C., Christopher Frueh, B., Baldwin, P. R., & Salas, R. (2016) · Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging · doi:10.1016/j.pscychresns.2016.09.005 · Cited by 95 · cited 1× · see citing works
“RenderX VMPFC volume and reduced connectivity between the prefrontal cortex and the limbic system, further supporting it as a potential therapeutic target [31,81].”
Leung, A., Metzger-Smith, V., He, Y., Cordero, J., Ehlert, B., Song, D. D., Lin, L. D., Golshan, S., Tsai, A., Vaninetti, M., et al. (2017) · Neuromodulation Technology at the Neural Interface · doi:10.1111/ner.12615 · Cited by 94 · see citing works
Use of Generalized Linear Mixed Models for Network Meta-analysis
Tu, Y. (2014) · Medical Decision Making · doi:10.1177/0272989x14545789 · Cited by 92 · see citing works
IDS-C and IDS-SR: Psychometric properties in depressed in-patients
Corruble, E., Legrand, J. M., Duret, C., Charles, G., & Guelfi, J. D. (1999) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/s0165-0327(99)00055-5 · Cited by 89 · see citing works
The NeuroStar TMS Device: Conducting the FDA Approved Protocol for Treatment of Depression
Horvath, J. C., Mathews, J., Demitrack, M. A., & Pascual-Leone, A. (2010) · Journal of Visualized Experiments · doi:10.3791/2345 · Cited by 83 · see citing works
Leung, A., Shukla, S., Fallah, A., Song, D., Lin, L., Golshan, S., Tsai, A., Jak, A., Polston, G., & Lee, R. (2016) · Neuromodulation: Technology at the Neural Interface · doi:10.1111/ner.12364 · Cited by 80 · see citing works
Meta‐analyzing partial correlation coefficients using Fisher's z transformation
van Aert, R. C. M. (2023) · Research Synthesis Methods · doi:10.1002/jrsm.1654 · Cited by 78 · see citing works
Impact of frontal lobe lesions on rehabilitation and recovery from acute brain injury
Eslinger, P. J., Grattan, L. M., & Geder, L. (1995) · NeuroRehabilitation · doi:10.3233/nre-1995-5206 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
Quality of life up to 10 years after traumatic brain injury: a cross-sectional analysis
Rauen, K., Reichelt, L., Probst, P., Schäpers, B., Müller, F., Jahn, K., & Plesnila, N. (2020) · Health and Quality of Life Outcomes · doi:10.1186/s12955-020-01391-3 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
Cyders, M. A., Dzemidzic, M., Eiler, W. J., Coskunpinar, A., Karyadi, K. A., & Kareken, D. A. (2015) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhu123 · Cited by 69 · see citing works
Bilateral Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Decreases Suicidal Ideation in Depression
Weissman, C. R., Blumberger, D. M., Brown, P. E., Isserles, M., Rajji, T. K., Downar, J., Mulsant, B. H., Fitzgerald, P. B., & Daskalakis, Z. J. (2018) · The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry · doi:10.4088/jcp.17m11692 · Cited by 67 · cited 2× · see citing works
“In addition, a study of pooled sham-controlled trials reported that bilateral TMS is associated with a decline in SI [74].”
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Adolescent Depression
Croarkin, P. E., & MacMaster, F. P. (2019) · Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Clinics of North America · doi:10.1016/j.chc.2018.07.003 · Cited by 65 · see citing works
Hostetter, T. A., Hoffmire, C. A., Forster, J. E., Adams, R. S., Stearns-Yoder, K. A., & Brenner, L. A. (2019) · Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation · doi:10.1097/htr.0000000000000489 · Cited by 64 · see citing works
Self-citationLi, C.-T., Chen, M.-H., Juan, C.-H., Liu, R.-S., Lin, W.-C., Bai, Y.-M., & Su, T.-P. (2018) · Brain Stimulation · doi:10.1016/j.brs.2018.04.014 · Cited by 62 · see citing works
Review of the Neurobehavioral Symptom Inventory.
Silva, M. A. (2021) · Rehabilitation Psychology · doi:10.1037/rep0000367 · Cited by 61 · see citing works
Rao, V., Bechtold, K., McCann, U., Roy, D., Peters, M., Vaishnavi, S., Yousem, D., Mori, S., Yan, H., Leoutsakos, J., et al. (2019) · The Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences · doi:10.1176/appi.neuropsych.17110338 · Cited by 60 · see citing works
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
Pape, T., Rosenow, J. M., & Lewis, G. N. (2006) · Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation · doi:10.1097/00001199-200609000-00063 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
Intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) ameliorates therapy-resistant depression: A case series
Holzer, M., & Padberg, F. (2010) · Brain Stimulation · doi:10.1016/j.brs.2009.10.004 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
How Inhibition Relates to Impulsivity after Moderate to Severe Traumatic Brain Injury
Rochat, L., Beni, C., Annoni, J.-M., Vuadens, P., & Van der Linden, M. (2013) · Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society · doi:10.1017/s1355617713000672 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
Choi, G., Kwak, S., Lee, H., & Chang, M. (2018) · Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine · doi:10.2340/16501977-2321 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
Transcranial magnetic stimulation to reduce suicidality – A review and naturalistic outcomes
Bozzay, M. L., Primack, J., Barredo, J., & Philip, N. S. (2020) · Journal of Psychiatric Research · doi:10.1016/j.jpsychires.2020.03.016 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
Self-citationMadore, M. R., Kozel, F. A., Williams, L. M., Green, L. C., George, M. S., Holtzheimer, P. E., Yesavage, J. A., & Philip, N. S. (2022) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2021.10.025 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
Self-citationWelz, T., Doebler, P., & Pauly, M. (2021) · British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology · doi:10.1111/bmsp.12242 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
Price, R. B., Gillan, C. M., Hanlon, C., Ferrarelli, F., Kim, T., Karim, H. T., Renard, M., Kaskie, R., Degutis, M., Wears, A., et al. (2021) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.2020.20060821 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
Self-citationOrbitofrontal cortical thinning and aggression in mild traumatic brain injury patients
Epstein, D. J., Legarreta, M., Bueler, E., King, J., McGlade, E., & Yurgelun‐Todd, D. (2016) · Brain and Behavior · doi:10.1002/brb3.581 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
Salat, D. H., Robinson, M. E., Miller, D. R., Clark, D. C., & McGlinchey, R. E. (2017) · Brain Injury · doi:10.1080/02699052.2017.1327672 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
Structural and Volumetric Brain MRI Findings in Mild Traumatic Brain Injury
Patel, J. B., Wilson, S. H., Oakes, T. R., Santhanam, P., & Weaver, L. K. (2020) · American Journal of Neuroradiology · doi:10.3174/ajnr.a6346 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Improvement of depression following transcranial magnetic stimulation
George, M. S., Nahas, Z., Kozel, F. A., Goldman, J., Molloy, M., & Oliver, N. (1999) · Current Psychiatry Reports · doi:10.1007/s11920-999-0020-2 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Traumatic brain injury, executive functioning, and suicidal behavior: A brief report.
Homaifar, B. Y., Brenner, L. A., Forster, J. E., & Nagamoto, H. (2012) · Rehabilitation Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0030480 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Self-citationAlcohol Abuse Disorders Among U.S. Service Members With Mild Traumatic Brain Injury
Heltemes, K. J., Dougherty, A. L., MacGregor, A. J., & Galarneau, M. R. (2011) · Military Medicine · doi:10.7205/milmed-d-10-00191 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Batail, J.-M., Xiao, X., Azeez, A., Tischler, C., Kratter, I. H., Bishop, J. H., Saggar, M., & Williams, N. R. (2023) · Translational Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/s41398-023-02537-9 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Administration, U. S. F. &. D. (2018) · Case Medical Research · doi:10.31525/fda2-ucm617244.htm · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Cao, J., Chen, X., Chen, J., Ai, M., Gan, Y., He, J., & Kuang, L. (2021) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2021.567976 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Risk Factors for Suicidal Ideation Following Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: A TRACK-TBI Study
Campbell‐Sills, L., Jain, S., Sun, X., Fisher, L. B., Agtarap, S., DIKMEN, S. S., Nelson, L. D., Temkin, N. R., McCrea, M., Yuh, E. L., et al. (2020) · Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation · doi:10.1097/htr.0000000000000602 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Herrold, A., Kletzel, S., Harton, B., Chambers, R., Jordan, N., & Pape, T.-B. (2014) · Neural Regeneration Research · doi:10.4103/1673-5374.143408 · Cited by 25 · cited 2× · see citing works
“TMS also has demonstrated efficacy in the treatment of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), chronic pain, cognitive deficits, and headaches in individuals with mTBI [23-27].”
Self-citationA Systematic Review of Neuromodulation Treatment Effects on Suicidality
Kucuker, M. U., Almorsy, A. G., Sonmez, A. I., Ligezka, A. N., Doruk Camsari, D., Lewis, C. P., & Croarkin, P. E. (2021) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2021.660926 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Executive Functioning of Combat Mild Traumatic Brain Injury
Gaines, K. D., Soper, H. V., & Berenji, G. R. (2016) · Applied Neuropsychology: Adult · doi:10.1080/23279095.2015.1012762 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Suicide Among Veterans: Veterans' Issues in Focus
Ramchand, R. (2021) · RAND Corporation eBooks · doi:10.7249/pea1363-1 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Ahorsu, D. K., Adjaottor, E. S., & Lam, B. Y. H. (2021) · Brain Sciences · doi:10.3390/brainsci11070840 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Selecting Suicide Ideation Assessment Instruments: A Meta-Analytic Review
Erford, B. T., Jackson, J., Bardhoshi, G., Duncan, K., & Atalay, Z. (2018) · Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development · doi:10.1080/07481756.2017.1358062 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Philip, N. S., Ramanathan, D., Gamboa, B., Brennan, M. C., Kozel, F. A., Lazzeroni, L., & Madore, M. R. (2023) · Neuromodulation: Technology at the Neural Interface · doi:10.1016/j.neurom.2022.11.015 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Self-citationOberman, L. M., Exley, S., Philip, N. S., Siddiqi, S. H., Adamson, M. M., & Brody, D. L. (2020) · Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation · doi:10.1097/htr.0000000000000628 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Self-citationEvren, C., Ovali, E., Karabulut, V., & Cetingok, S. (2014) · Klinik Psikofarmakoloji Bülteni-Bulletin of Clinical Psychopharmacology · doi:10.5455/bcp.20130310124522 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Awan, N., DiSanto, D., Juengst, S. B., Kumar, R. G., Bertisch, H., Niemeier, J., Fann, J. R., Kesinger, M. R., Sperry, J., & Wagner, A. K. (2021) · Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation · doi:10.1097/htr.0000000000000588 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Multimodal Elements of Suicidality Reduction After Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
Barredo, J., Berlow, Y. A., Swearingen, H. R., Greenberg, B. D., Carpenter, L. L., & Philip, N. S. (2021) · Neuromodulation Technology at the Neural Interface · doi:10.1111/ner.13376 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Self-citationAlgorithm for Symptom Attribution and Classification Following Possible Mild Traumatic Brain Injury
Pape, T., Herrold, A. A., Smith, B., Babcock-Parziale, J. L., Harp, J. P., Shandera‐Ochsner, A. L., Jenkins, S. L., Evans, C. T., Schleenbaker, R. E., & High, W. M. (2016) · Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation · doi:10.1097/htr.0000000000000220 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Self-citationJorna, L. S., Westerhof-Evers, H. J., Khosdelazad, S., Rakers, S. E., van der Naalt, J., Groen, R. J. M., Buunk, A. M., & Spikman, J. M. (2021) · Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society · doi:10.1017/s135561772000140x · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Rivest‐Beauregard, M., Brunet, A., Gaston, L., et al. (2022) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037/pas0001099 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Recognising and assessing neurobehavioural disability after traumatic brain injury
Wood, R. L. (2013) · NeuroRehabilitation · doi:10.3233/nre-130895 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Smith, H. R., Imperatore, J. P., & Hanlon, C. A. (2021) · Brain Stimulation · doi:10.1016/j.brs.2021.04.007 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Self-citationNegative urgency is related to impaired response inhibition during threatening conditions
Roxburgh, A. D., White, D., & Cornwell, B. R. (2022) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2022.103648 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Can seizure therapies and noninvasive brain stimulations prevent suicidality? A systematic review
Chen, Y., Magnin, C., Brunelin, J., Leaune, E., Fang, Y., & Poulet, E. (2021) · Brain and Behavior · doi:10.1002/brb3.2144 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Psychological predictors of functional outcomes in service members with traumatic brain injury
Ramanathan-Elion, D. M., Baydoun, H. A., & Johnstone, B. (2020) · Brain Injury · doi:10.1080/02699052.2020.1793387 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Sun, M., Marquardt, C. A., Disner, S. G., Burton, P. C., Davenport, N. D., Lissek, S., & Sponheim, S. R. (2020) · Personality Neuroscience · doi:10.1017/pen.2020.10 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Gomez, R., & Watson, S. (2023) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2023.112125 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Sparse Estimation Strategies in Linear Mixed Effect Models for High-Dimensional Data Application
Opoku, E. A., Ahmed, S. E., & Nathoo, F. S. (2021) · Entropy · doi:10.3390/e23101348 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Aaronson, A. L., Smith, B., Krese, K., Barnhart, M., Adamson, M., de Wit, H., Philip, N. S., Brenner, L. A., Bender-Pape, T., & Herrold, A. A. (2024) · The Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences · doi:10.1176/appi.neuropsych.20230044 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Self-citationRobinson, C., & Helmick, K. M. (2013) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203568491-22 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Leung, A., Metzger-Smith, V., He, Y., Cordero, J., Ehlert, B., Song, D., Golshan, S., Tsai, A., Vaninetti, M., Rutledge, T., et al. (2018) · Brain Stimulation · doi:10.1016/j.brs.2018.01.009 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Lemle, R. B. (2018) · Europe PMC (PubMed Central) · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Gouveia, P., Ramos, C., Brito, J., Almeida, T. C., & Cardoso, J. (2022) · Psicologia: Reflexão e Crítica · doi:10.1186/s41155-022-00225-z · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Correlations for the Stroop Color and Word Test with Measures of Reading and Language Achievement
Leverett, J. P., Lassiter, K. S., & Buchanan, G. M. (2002) · Perceptual and Motor Skills · doi:10.2466/pms.2002.94.2.459 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Editorial: Descriptive Statistics
Richardson, E. G. (2007) · Foot & Ankle International · doi:10.3113/fai.2007.1217 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Tendler, A., & Sisko, E. (2018) · InTech eBooks · doi:10.5772/intechopen.73594 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Silver, J., Yudofsky, S. C., & Anderson, K. (2011) · American Psychiatric Association Publishing eBooks · doi:10.1176/appi.books.9781585624201.js14 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Linhartová, P., Svěrák, T., Gajdos, M., & Kašpárek, T. (2021) · Brain Stimulation · doi:10.1016/j.brs.2021.10.292 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) Self-Referential Processing (rTMS-SRP)
(2019) · Case Medical Research · doi:10.31525/ct1-nct04068857 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- Ramchand, R, 2022, Rand Health Q, 9, 21
- ReidLDFingarKRInpatient stays and emergency department visits involving traumatic brain injury, 2017Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) & Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ)2024-04-29https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK556732/pdf/Bookshelf_NBK556732.pdf
- Silver, JM, 2011, Textbook of Traumatic Brain Injury. 2nd edition
- First, MB, 2016, User's Guide for the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-5® Disorders—Clinician Version (SCID-5-CV)
Cited by
Still being checked.
- Authors
- Bernanke, A., Hasley, R., Sabetfakhri, N., de Wit, H., Smith, B. M., Wang, L., Brenner, L. A., Hanlon, C., Philip, N. S., Ajilore, O., Herrold, A., & Aaronson, A.
- Affiliations
- Northwestern University (US)
- Edward Hines, Jr. VA Hospital (US)
- University of Illinois Chicago (US)
- Veterans Health Administration (US)
- The Ohio State University (US)
- University of Colorado Anschutz (US)
- BrainsWay (Israel) (IL)
- Providence VA Medical Center (US)
- Corresponding author
- Aaronson, Alexandra
- ORCID
- Venue
- JMIR Research Protocols
- Publisher
- JMIR Publications Inc.
- Published
- 2024-12-13
- Volume
- 13
- Pages
- e58206
- ISSN
- 1929-0748 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC11681286
- OpenAlex
- W4402524554
- Semantic Scholar
- 3e91cf27a48113b235c23239428e932fdba8dfe9
- Cited by
- 2
- References
- 137
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1
- FWCI
- 0.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- JMIR Research Protocols (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (IK2 RX002938, IK2 RX004298)
- Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
- University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
- Rehabilitation Research and Development Service
- National Institute of Mental Health (R25 MH115855)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Traumatic Brain Injury Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Electroconvulsive Therapy Studies
- Keywords
- intermittent theta burst stimulation, repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation, mild traumatic brain injury, veterans, impulsivity, suicidal ideation, suicide attempts, ventromedial prefrontal cortex, frontal pole, neuromodulation, post-traumatic stress disorder, depressive symptoms, neuroplasticity, co-occurring mental health disorders
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Mental Disorders, Brain Concussion, Female, Frontal Lobe, Humans, Impulsive Behavior, Male, Middle Aged, Pilot Projects, United States, Veterans, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation, Suicidal Ideation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-28.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-28.
Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review