Cited by 2Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation StudiesTraumatic Brain Injury ResearchElectroconvulsive Therapy Studies

Frontal Pole Neuromodulation for Impulsivity and Suicidality in Veterans With Mild Traumatic Brain Injury and Common Co-Occurring Mental Health Conditions: Protocol for a Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial

Open access
Bernanke, Alyssa, Hasley, Rebecca, Sabetfakhri, Niki, de Wit, Harriet, Smith, Bridget M, Wang, Lei, Brenner, Lisa A, Hanlon, Colleen +4 more·2024·JMIR Research Protocols

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Background: Suicide remains a leading cause of death among veterans in the United States, and mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) increases the risk of suicidal ideation (SI) and suicide attempts (SAs). mTBI worsens impulsivity and contributes to poor social and occupational functioning, which further increases the risk of SI and SAs. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation is a neuromodulatory treatment approach that induces neuroplasticity, potentially repairing neurodamage. Intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) is a second-generation form of transcranial magnetic stimulation that is safe, shorter in duration, displays a minimal side effect profile and is a promising treatment approach for impulsivity in mTBI. Our novel proposed treatment protocol uses frontal pole iTBS to target the ventromedial prefrontal cortex, which may reduce impulsivity by strengthening functional connectivity between the limbic system and frontal cortex, allowing for improved top-down control of impulsive reactions, including SI and SAs. Objective: The objectives of this study are to (1) develop an iTBS intervention for veterans with mTBI, impulsivity, and SI; (2) assess the feasibility and tolerability of the intervention; and (3) gather preliminary clinical outcome data on SI, impulsivity, and functions that will guide future studies. Methods: This is a pilot, double-blinded, randomized controlled trial. In developing this protocol, we referenced the SPIRIT (Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials) guidelines. We will enroll 56 participants (28 active iTBS and 28 sham iTBS). The iTBS intervention will be performed daily, 5 days a week, for 2 weeks. We will collect 10 validated, psychometric, quantitative outcome measures before, during, and after the intervention. Measures included will assess functioning, impulsivity, suicidality, posttraumatic stress disorder, and depressive symptoms. We will collect qualitative data through semistructured interviews to elicit feedback on the participants’ experiences and symptoms. We will perform quantitative and qualitative analyses to (1) assess the feasibility, tolerability, and acceptability of the treatment; (2) gather advanced neuroimaging data to assess neural changes elicited by treatment; and (3) assess improvements in outcome measures of impulsivity and suicidality in veterans with mTBI. Results: This study protocol was approved by the Edward Hines, Jr. VA Hospital Institutional Review Board (Hines IRB number 14-003). This novel treatment is a 5-year research project (April 1, 2023, to March 31, 2028) funded by the Veterans Administration Rehabilitation Research and Development service (CDA2 award IK2 RX002938). Study results will be disseminated at or before the project’s end date in March 2028. Conclusions: We will provide preliminary evidence of the safety, feasibility, and acceptability of a novel frontal pole iTBS treatment for mTBI, impulsivity, SI and SAs, and functional deficits. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05647044; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05647044 International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID): PRR1-10.2196/58206

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

This is a protocol for a pilot, double-blind, sham-controlled randomized trial of frontal pole intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) in veterans with mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI), impulsivity, and suicidal ideation. The study aims to assess safety, feasibility, tolerability, preliminary clinical outcomes, and pre/post neuroimaging changes, with results expected by March 2028.

Key findings

  • No clinical efficacy findings are reported; the paper presents a protocol. As of July 2024, 2 participants were enrolled, with enrollment beginning in July 2024 and dissemination planned on or before March 2028.
  • The planned sample is 56 veterans (28 active iTBS and 28 sham iTBS), with 10 iTBS sessions delivered daily, 5 days a week, for 2 weeks.
  • The power analysis assumes a mean Social and Occupational Functioning Assessment Scale (SOFAS) score of 44.6 and SD of 15; with 50 veterans, the study will have 82% power to detect a time-by-treatment interaction assuming no change in the sham group and a 13-point change in the active iTBS group.
  • The authors hypothesize that frontal pole iTBS will be safe, feasible, and tolerable; improve social and occupational functioning, negative urgency impulsivity, and suicidal ideation; and strengthen resting-state functional connectivity between the ventromedial prefrontal cortex (VMPFC) and limbic system, especially the amygdala and anterior cingulate cortex.

Methods

  • Pilot, prospective, randomized, double-blinded, sham-controlled trial enrolling 56 veterans aged 22-65 years with mTBI at least 1 year before enrollment, impulsivity documented in the chart and UPPS-P Negative Urgency score >20, and suicidal ideation within the past 3 months (Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale score ≥1). Exclusions include active suicidal ideation with intent and plan, contraindications to TMS or MRI, active substance use disorder, history of moderate to severe TBI, and others.
  • Intervention: 9-minute iTBS to the right frontal pole (FP2, overlapping right VMPFC), delivering 1800 pulses at 110% of motor threshold, with 3 pulses at 50 Hz repeated every 200 ms, a 2-second train every 10 seconds for 570 seconds. Sessions occur once daily for 10 business days; active and sham coils are visually identical, with headphones and scalp electrodes used for blinding.
  • Data collection and analysis: MRI before and after treatment (T1, resting-state fMRI, diffusion tensor imaging), 10 validated psychometric measures at screening, baseline, midpoint, and endpoint, plus semistructured qualitative interviews. Analyses include descriptive statistics, mixed-model ANOVA for SOFAS, generalized linear models for connectivity, Fisher R-to-Z transformation, ROI-to-ROI connectivity analyses, false-discovery rate correction, and covariates such as age, sex, and baseline psychiatric diagnoses.

Limitations

  • The paper states that the small sample size reduces study power and may limit detection of statistically significant outcome differences; baseline variability in co-occurring psychiatric and somatic conditions and medications may impact findings, and only select covariates can be added given the small sample.
  • The paper states that the 72-hour post-treatment follow-up will not provide insight into long-term effects, that optimal iTBS dose parameters remain uncertain, and that the study does not select targets based on resting-state data.
  • Evident from the text: this is a protocol with no efficacy or safety results yet; as of July 2024, only 2 participants were enrolled, so all clinical and neuroimaging findings are pending.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2196/58206

Cites

137 of 137 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

82 of 148 cited sources checked · 11 supported · 1 flagged · accuracy not yet measured

  • Premisecitation

    Negative urgency impulsivity increases the likelihood of SI.

    “Unsurprisingly, negative urgency impulsivity increases the likelihood of SI [41]”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [41] source

      The Results (Bivariate Correlations; page unavailable) report a significant positive association between Negative Urgency and all five suicidality and self-injury measures, including past suicidal ideation. The Results (Incremental Validity; page unavailable) also find that its association with these outcomes was strong among participants low in premeditation but nonsignificant among those high in premeditation. These associations support a link with SI, but do not establish that Negative Urgency itself increases its likelihood. (LLM, conf=0.86)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Premisecitation

    TBI predisposes individuals to impulsivity.

    “TBI predisposes individuals to functional deficits [14,15] and impulsivity [16], and those with impulsivity likely struggle with functional deficits [17].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [16] source

      The Introduction discusses urgency and risk-taking, and the Discussion lists disorders associated with impulsivity; neither addresses traumatic brain injury. Searches for “TBI” and “traumatic brain injury” found no passage stating that TBI predisposes individuals to impulsivity. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.76)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Premisecitation

    The VMPFC is particularly vulnerable to damage in all severities of TBI because it abuts the cranial floor and frontal cranial bone, making it susceptible to coup and contrecoup forces from nearly all directions.

    “The VMPFC, which serves as an inhibitory control center for the limbic system, is particularly vulnerable to damage in all severities of TBI as this region abuts the cranial floor and frontal cranial bone, making it susceptible to coup and contrecoup forces from nearly all directions [31,44,45].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [31] source

      The Materials and methods (MRI analyses; page unavailable) identify the ventromedial prefrontal cortex as a region of interest, but the paper studies suicidal vulnerability in mood disorders, not traumatic brain injury. Searches for TBI, cranial-floor anatomy, and coup–contrecoup forces found no passage supporting the claimed vulnerability across TBI severities. (LLM, conf=0.73)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [44] source
    • cites [45] source
  • Premisecitation

    TMS also improves PTSD symptoms among those with co-occurring mTBI.

    “TMS also improves PTSD symptoms among those with co-occurring mTBI [22,27].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [22] source
    • cites [27] source

      The “rTMS as a PTSD treatment” section reports improved PTSD symptoms in studies of patients with PTSD, including some with co-occurring depression. But the “Co-occurring conditions” section says the trial involving patients with PTSD, TBI, or both reported no PTSD-specific outcomes. The paper therefore does not establish improvement in PTSD symptoms among people with co-occurring mTBI. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Premisecitation

    Diminished VMPFC-limbic connectivity is suspected to be responsible for impulsivity and SI in individuals with mTBI.

    “This diminished connectivity is suspected to be responsible for impulsivity and SI in individuals with mTBI [30-32].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim3 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [30] source

      The Discussion (Prefrontal-Parietal RSFC; page not provided) reports that reduced fronto-parietal connectivity in young depressed patients with suicide attempts was associated with both impulsivity and suicidal-ideation scores. The Conclusion says prefrontal–rACC connectivity was associated with impulsivity but not suicidal-ideation scores. This paper does not study individuals with mTBI or establish that diminished VMPFC–limbic connectivity is responsible for both outcomes in that population. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [31] source

      The Discussion links dysfunction of an interconnected prefrontal network to suicidal ideas, and the Results report correlations between prefrontal structural measures and impulsiveness in patients with mood disorders. The paper does not establish diminished VMPFC–limbic connectivity as the cause of impulsivity or suicidal ideation, and it does not study individuals with mTBI. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.78)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [32] source

      The Results and Discussion (page not available) report associations between blast-induced mTBI severity and amygdala activity, while the Summary discusses vmPFC-sgACC activity in relation to posttraumatic stress symptoms. Searches for vmPFC–limbic connectivity, impulsivity, and suicidal ideation found no passage linking diminished connectivity to those outcomes in people with mTBI. (LLM, conf=0.74)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims. 38
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 55
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Individuals without a history of mTBI who attempted suicide or have a history of SI also show diminished VMPFC volume and reduced connectivity between the prefrontal cortex and the limbic system.

    “Interestingly, individuals without a history of mTBI who attempted suicide or have a history of SI also show diminished VMPFC volume and reduced connectivity between the prefrontal cortex and the limbic system, further supporting it as a potential therapeutic target [31,81].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [31] source

      The Methods define the ventromedial prefrontal cortex as part of the MPFC region studied. The Discussion reports structural impairments in suicide attempters in the VLPFC, DPFC and OFC, but not MPFC—contrary to the claimed VMPFC reduction. This structural imaging study does not establish reduced prefrontal–limbic connectivity or the claim about people with suicidal ideation or no mTBI history. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [81] source

      The Results report reduced frontal-lobe volume in psychiatric inpatients who recently attempted suicide compared with depressed non-attempters. They do not identify a VMPFC reduction, and they found no significant volumetric differences for the suicidal-ideation group. The study assessed brain volumes, not prefrontal–limbic connectivity; its Methods establish absence of head trauma for healthy controls, not for the psychiatric patients. (LLM, conf=0.89)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    TMS was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration in 2008 for the treatment of major depressive disorder.

    “TMS was subsequently approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 2008 for the treatment of major depressive disorder [20].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [20] source

      The Abstract states that the NeuroStar TMS device received FDA approval in October 2008 for a specific form of medication-refractory depression. The Discussion clarifies that approval was limited to a specified protocol, device, and patient population. The citing sentence gets the year and depression indication right but describes the approval more broadly than the source does. (LLM, conf=0.86)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    A meta-analysis of psychosocial factors found that difficulties in social and occupational functioning were strongly tied to increased levels of SI, social isolation, and low socioeconomic status and are directly associated with increased incidences of SI and completed suicides.

    “A meta-analysis of psychosocial factors found that difficulties in social and occupational functioning were strongly tied to increased levels of SI, social isolation, and low socioeconomic status and are directly associated with increased incidences of SI and completed suicides (Figure 1) [48].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [48] source

      The Social integration section links weaker social connections to higher suicide mortality, and the Socioeconomic status section links lower socioeconomic position to suicidal ideation and suicide deaths. But the paper describes itself as a narrative overview, not a meta-analysis, and it does not establish that difficulties in social and occupational functioning directly cause increased suicidal ideation or suicide. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    In iTBS, 50 Hz triplets are applied at a theta rhythm of 5 Hz, which is thought to facilitate long-term potentiation in less time and with fewer pulses than standard TMS, which generally is administered at 5 to 10 Hz.

    “In iTBS, 50 Hz triplets are applied at a theta rhythm (5 Hz), which is thought to facilitate long-term potentiation in less time and with fewer pulses than standard TMS, which generally is administered at 5 to 10 Hz [57].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [57] source

      The Introduction (page unavailable) describes theta bursts repeated at 5 Hz for LTP induction, and ‘Economy’ of Theta-Burst Stimulation (page unavailable) reports that theta bursts induced LTP with fewer pulses than unpatterned stimulation. The experiments described used four-pulse bursts at 100 Hz in hippocampal tissue; these passages do not establish the 50 Hz triplets of iTBS, a shorter administration time, or a comparison with standard TMS administered at 5–10 Hz. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Studies demonstrate that this number of pulses results in an optimal window of cortical excitability, and additional pulses may have an inhibitory effect.

    “Studies demonstrate that this number of pulses results in an optimal “window” of cortical excitability, and additional pulses may have an inhibitory effect [59-61].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [59] source
    • cites [60] source

      The Results (iTBS versus ProiTBS; page unavailable) report that conventional intermittent theta-burst stimulation increased motor-cortex excitability, while prolonged stimulation suppressed it. The Introduction says pulse number and other parameters still need evaluation to optimize stimulation, so the study does not establish that the cited pulse count is an optimal window. (LLM, conf=0.84)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [61] source

      The section on iTBS aftereffects reports that earlier studies observed decreases in cortical excitability after repeated stimulation, supporting the possibility of an inhibitory effect. But this study found no such decrease: a third block, bringing the total to 1800 pulses, further increased excitability. Its Conclusions therefore do not establish the claimed optimal pulse window. (LLM, conf=0.83)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    In a national US VA TMS study of 770 veterans receiving TMS, nearly half had mTBI, and TMS was demonstrated to be equally safe in veterans with and without mTBI.

    “Specifically, in a national US VA TMS study of 770 veterans receiving TMS, nearly half had mTBI, and TMS was demonstrated to be equally safe in veterans with and without mTBI [64].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [64] source

      The Abstract (Results) reports 770 veterans receiving at least one TMS session, and Results (Safety) reports significant adverse outcomes in fewer than 1% of patients overall. Our copy does not report that nearly half had mTBI or compare safety between veterans with and without mTBI; searches for mTBI and traumatic brain injury did not find such an analysis. (LLM, conf=0.86)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    TMS has demonstrated efficacy in the treatment of PTSD, chronic pain, cognitive deficits, and headaches in individuals with mTBI.

    “TMS also has demonstrated efficacy in the treatment of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), chronic pain, cognitive deficits, and headaches in individuals with mTBI [23-27].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim3 of 5 sources checked
    • cites [23] source

      The Results section on PTSD symptoms following concussion reports a statistically significant finding in a small veteran subgroup, but says the evidence consists of small pilot trials. The Results section on cognitive symptoms reports no significant benefit on cognitive assessments, including in a sham-controlled trial. The Discussion mentions chronic pain and headache as co-occurring symptoms, not as conditions for which this paper demonstrates TMS efficacy. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [24] source

      The Introduction reports that TMS has improved cognitive functions and psychological problems including PTSD in people with TBI. It does not limit those findings to mild TBI, and the paper’s analysis concerns cognition rather than chronic pain or headaches. Although the References list a study of TMS for mild-TBI-related headaches, that citation alone does not establish demonstrated efficacy for headaches. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [25] source
    • cites [26] source
    • cites [27] source

      The ‘rTMS as a PTSD treatment’ section reports studies with improved PTSD symptoms, and the TBI-treatment section describes preliminary evidence of symptom improvement in 15 people with mTBI (page numbers unavailable). It does not establish efficacy for chronic pain, cognitive deficits, or headaches in people with mTBI; it also cautions that TBI treatment evidence is limited. (LLM, conf=0.86)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    An overall estimate of 70% of individuals with mTBI struggle with at least one psychiatric comorbidity.

    “An overall estimate of 70% of individuals with mTBI struggle with at least one psychiatric comorbidity [65].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [65] source

      The POST-TBI PSYCHIATRIC DISORDERS section (page unavailable) reports that 74.5% received a psychiatric diagnosis over five years, but that sample consisted predominantly of people with moderate to severe TBI, not mTBI. It also reports a 34.0% first-year rate for mild TBI in a medical-file review, so the approximately 70% figure is not supported as an overall estimate for mTBI. (LLM, conf=0.90)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The Patient Health Questionnaire-9 has Cronbach alpha=0.9 (very high).

    “Cronbach α=0.9 (very high) [110]”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Studies on TMS for suicidality are often limited by small sample sizes, inconsistencies in how suicidality is measured across studies, and contradictory findings.

    “Studies are often limited by small sample sizes, inconsistencies in how suicidality is measured across studies, and contradictory findings [75,76].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [75] source

      The Discussion (page not provided) identifies the small sample size as this study’s main limitation, and the Secondary Outcomes section reports a suicide-symptom result measured with the BSSI. The paper does not establish that TMS studies of suicidality often use inconsistent measures or have contradictory findings across studies; its small-sample limitation concerns this particular trial. (LLM, conf=0.85)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [76] source

      The “Studies of TMS in Depressed Adolescents” section (page unavailable) describes only 112 participants across 10 publications, mostly case reports and open-label studies, supporting the small-sample limitation. The Safety section identifies suicidality as a concern but does not describe inconsistent measures of suicidality or contradictory findings across studies. (LLM, conf=0.84)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The Clinically Administered PTSD Scale for DSM-5 has interrater reliability K=0.78-1.0 (high) and discriminant validity rs=0.02-0.54 (moderate).

    “Interrater reliability K=0.78-1.0 (high) discriminant validity: rs=0.02−0.54 (moderate) [100]”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [100] source

      The Results sections on interrater reliability and convergent and discriminant validity report the stated CAPS-5 ranges: κ = .78 to 1.0 and rs = .02 to .54. However, the paper calls correlations of .33 to .54 moderate and those of .02 and .18 weak, so describing the entire discriminant-validity range as moderate overstates the finding. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale has Cronbach alpha=0.90 (very high).

    “Cronbach α=0.90 (very high) [120]”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [120] source

      The cited correction says only that a funding note was missing from the original article (p. 1, correction notice and Funding). A search of our copy for Cronbach’s alpha and 0.90 found no reliability estimate, so this correction does not verify the claimed value. (LLM, conf=0.76)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductcitation

    The authors used the CONSORT checklist when writing their report.

    “We used the CONSORT (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials) checklist when writing our report [86].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The Delayed Discounting Task has test-retest reliability rtt=0.89 (very high).

    “Test-retest reliability rtt=0.89 (very high) [122]”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The Drug Use Disorders Identification Test has Cronbach alpha=0.93 (very high) and convergent validity r=0.76 (high).

    “Cronbach α=0.93 (very high), convergent validity r=0.76 (high) [102,103]”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [102] source
    • cites [103] source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Studies show that both TMS and iTBS appear safe and effective when administered to other anatomical sites in individuals with mTBI.

    “as studies show that both TMS and iTBS appear safe and effective when administered to other anatomical sites in individuals with mTBI [23-26].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 4 sources checked
    • cites [23] source

      The Abstract Results (page unavailable) support the safety of rTMS after concussion but say evidence for efficacy is limited. The Results section on PTSD (page unavailable) reports a statistically significant finding in a small concussion subgroup of a theta-burst trial, while the Discussion says all reviewed studies targeted the DLPFC. The paper therefore does not establish that both approaches are effective across other anatomical sites in people with mTBI. (LLM, conf=0.87)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [24] source

      The Introduction (page not available) reports improvements after TMS stimulation of several brain regions in people with TBI. But the paper does not establish that both TMS and iTBS are safe and effective specifically in people with mild TBI; it discusses TBI more broadly and does not identify iTBS as a separately evaluated intervention. (LLM, conf=0.84)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [25] source
    • cites [26] source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    iTBS can be applied to the frontal pole to target the VMPFC, and iTBS to the frontal pole is tolerable, with no more subjective pain than TMS.

    “iTBS can be applied to the frontal pole to target the VMPFC, and iTBS to the frontal pole is tolerable, with no more subjective pain than TMS [63].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [63] source

      The Methods report continuous theta-burst stimulation at the frontal pole (FP1), but intermittent theta-burst stimulation (iTBS) at F3, not the frontal pole. The Results and Conclusions find that ramped frontal-pole TMS was tolerable and not significantly more painful than DLPFC TMS; they do not establish this specifically for frontal-pole iTBS. The Introduction identifies the frontal pole as part of the medial prefrontal cortex but does not identify the stimulated site as the VMPFC. (LLM, conf=0.90)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Frontal pole iTBS allows for more direct stimulation of the VMPFC and modulation of the limbic system.

    “This approach allows for more direct stimulation of the VMPFC and modulation of the limbic system [63,82].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [63] source

      The Introduction (page unavailable) identifies the frontal pole as part of the medial prefrontal cortex and discusses TMS modulation of frontal-pole activity. But the Methods (page unavailable) specify continuous theta-burst stimulation at the frontal pole and iTBS at F3, not the frontal pole. The paper does not establish more direct VMPFC stimulation or limbic-system modulation by frontal-pole iTBS. (LLM, conf=0.83)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [82] source

      The Discussion (§§4.1 and 4.3; page unavailable) supports targeting the frontal pole more directly than the DLPFC and reports changes in connected salience- and reward-related regions. But the study tested continuous theta-burst stimulation (cTBS), not iTBS, and does not establish direct stimulation of the VMPFC specifically. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-5, Research Version has K>0.4 (above average) and sensitivity of identifying diagnosis >0.8 (good).

    “K>0.4 (above average) sensitivity of identifying diagnosis >0.8 (good) [105]”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [105] source

      The Results report sensitivity above 0.80 for all diagnoses and kappa above 0.4 for all diagnoses except anxiety disorders, for which kappa was 0.34. The study evaluated the SCID-5 Clinician Version, not the Research Version named in the claim. (LLM, conf=0.90)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The UPPS-P Negative Urgency subscale has Cronbach alpha=0.91 (very high).

    “Cronbach α=0.91 (very high) [41,97]”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [41] source

      The Method > Measures section describes the four-trait UPPS scale and gives a mean and standard deviation for Negative Urgency, but no Cronbach alpha. Searches for “0.91,” “Cronbach alpha,” and Negative Urgency reliability found no passage supporting the claimed value; the copy also identifies the instrument used as UPPS, not UPPS-P. Page numbers were unavailable. (LLM, conf=0.75)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [97] source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The right frontal pole anatomical location is easily identifiable using anatomical landmarks and correlates with electrode FP2 on a 10-20 EEG, a region overlapping with the right VMPFC.

    “The anatomical location is easily identifiable using anatomical landmarks and correlates with electrode frontal polar cortex (FP; FP2) on a 10 to 20 electroencephalogram, a region overlapping with the right VMPFC [22,63,82].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim3 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [22] source

      The Materials and Methods section describes TMS delivered primarily to the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, but does not describe how to locate the right frontal pole. Searches for FP2, VMPFC, and anatomical landmarks found no passage establishing the claimed EEG correspondence or overlap. (LLM, conf=0.76)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [63] source

      The Introduction identifies the frontal pole as part of the medial prefrontal cortex, and the Methods use a 10–20 EEG position to target it. But the Methods specify FP1, not the claimed right-sided FP2; the paper does not say the location is easily identified by anatomical landmarks or that it overlaps the right VMPFC. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites [82] source

      The Methods (§2.3.1.1, page unavailable) support locating a frontal-pole stimulation site with anatomical landmarks and the 10–20 EEG system. But the paper places the coil at Fp1, approximating the left frontal pole—not FP2 on the right—and does not establish overlap with the right VMPFC. (LLM, conf=0.88)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The Beck Suicide Scale has Cronbach alpha=0.89 (very high) and strong predictive validity.

    “Cronbach α=0.89 (very high), strong predictive validity [114]”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [114] source

      The Internal consistency section reports α=0.89 for the SSI-W among 1,764 psychiatric outpatients with suicidal ideation, not for the full sample or the SSI-C. The Introduction and Discussion report that the SSI-W predicted subsequent suicide in an earlier outpatient study, supporting predictive validity for that version. The claim omits these qualifications and presents both properties as applying to the Beck Suicide Scale generally. (LLM, conf=0.86)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Many patients will require multiple medication trials and may take months to experience any symptomatic improvement.

    “Furthermore, many patients will require multiple medication trials and may take months to experience any symptomatic improvement [36].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [36] source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    More than 400,000 new TBI diagnoses have occurred among US service members since the beginning of operations Enduring Freedom, Iraqi Freedom, and New Dawn, of which more than 80% are mild traumatic brain injury.

    “These statistics are particularly concerning given that there have been >400,000 new TBI diagnoses among US service members since the beginning of operations Enduring Freedom, Iraqi Freedom, and New Dawn, of which >80% are mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) [3].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [3] DOD TBI worldwide numbersHealth.mil2024-04-29https://health.mil/Military-Health-Topics/Centers-of-Excellence/Traumatic-Brain-Injury-Center-of-Excellence/DOD-TBI-Worldwide-Numbers

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Negative urgency impulsivity is associated with excessive agitation, irritability, low moods, and a greater tendency for aggression toward oneself or others immediately following a negative event.

    “It is associated with excessive agitation, irritability, low moods, and a greater tendency for aggression toward oneself or others immediately following a negative event [40].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [40] source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    In a large noninferiority study comparing iTBS and TMS, patients with treatment-resistant depression show similar safety and adverse event profiles and exhibit improvements in depressive symptoms to both interventions.

    “In a large, noninferiority study comparing iTBS and TMS, patients with treatment-resistant depression show similar safety and adverse event (AE) profiles and exhibit improvements in their depressive symptoms to both interventions [29].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [29] source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Comorbid conditions with mTBI include substance use disorders, PTSD, and depression.

    “Comorbid conditions include substance use disorders, PTSD, and depression [66-68].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [66] source
    • cites [67] source
    • cites [68] source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    TBI, SI, impulsivity, and functional deficits are intertwined and should be considered in tandem.

    “Given that TBI and impulsivity are both (1) independent risk factors for developing SI and (2) associated with impaired social and community functioning, it appears that TBI, SI, impulsivity, and functional deficits are intertwined and should be considered in tandem.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Veterans with mTBI make up the majority, more than 80%, of the veteran population with TBI in the United States.

    “Veterans with mTBI make up the majority (>80%) of the veteran population with TBI in the United States [3].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [3] DOD TBI worldwide numbersHealth.mil2024-04-29https://health.mil/Military-Health-Topics/Centers-of-Excellence/Traumatic-Brain-Injury-Center-of-Excellence/DOD-TBI-Worldwide-Numbers

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Characteristics of negative urgency impulsivity can reduce quality of life and worsen community and social functioning, predisposing individuals to SI and SAs.

    “These characteristics of negative urgency impulsivity can reduce the quality of life and worsen community and social functioning, predisposing individuals to SI and SAs (Figure 1) [46].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [46] Silver, JM, 2011, Textbook of Traumatic Brain Injury. 2nd edition

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    TMS has demonstrated efficacy in the treatment of depression in large, multisite, sham-controlled trials.

    “Seminal studies by George et al [19] demonstrated the efficacy of TMS in the treatment of depression in large, multisite sham-controlled trials.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [19] source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    This amount of iTBS stimulation appears to be well tolerated and shows a good effect on depressive symptoms, even in a treatment-refractory group.

    “This amount of stimulation appears to be well tolerated and shows a good effect on depressive symptoms, even in a treatment-refractory group [58].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [58] source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    iTBS was first shown to treat depression in 2009 in a study by Holzer and Padberg.

    “A second-generation form of TMS, intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS), was first shown to treat depression in 2009 in a study by Holzer and Padberg [28].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [28] source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Veterans die by suicide at almost double the rate of civilians in the United States.

    “Veterans die by suicide at almost double the rate of civilians in the United States [1].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [1] Ramchand, R, 2022, Rand Health Q

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    TMS was subsequently approved by the FDA to treat treatment-resistant depression in 2008.

    “TMS was subsequently approved by the FDA to treat treatment-resistant depression in 2008 [53-55].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [53] Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) systems - class II special controls guidance for industry and FDA staffFood and Drug Administration, USA2024-04-29https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/guidance-documents-medical-devices-and-radiation-emitting-products/repetitive-transcranial-magnetic-stimulation-rtms-systems-class-ii-special-controls-guidance

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [54] FDA permits marketing of transcranial magnetic stimulation for treatment of obsessive-compulsive disorderFood and Drug Administration, USA20182024-04-29https://www.fda.gov/news-events/press-announcements/fda-permits-marketing-transcranial-magnetic-stimulation-treatment-obsessive-compulsive-disorder

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites [55] Coverage guidance for TMS for OCDClinical TMS Society2024-04-29https://www.clinicaltmssociety.org/sites/default/files/ctmss_recommended_ocd_coverage_policy_0.pdf

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Between 16% and 20% of all operations Enduring Freedom, Iraqi Freedom, and New Dawn veterans have a history of mTBI, and among them, up to 22% report suicidal ideation.

    “Overall, between 16% and 20% of all operations Enduring Freedom, Iraqi Freedom, and New Dawn veterans have a history of mTBI, and among them, up to 22% report suicidal ideation (SI) [4].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [4] source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    iTBS is a second-generation FDA-approved form of TMS designed to mimic endogenous brain rhythms with the added benefit of markedly reduced treatment time.

    “iTBS is a second-generation FDA-approved form of TMS designed to mimic endogenous brain rhythms with the added benefit of markedly reduced treatment time [28,56].”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [28] source
    • cites [56] source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductcitation

    To ensure tolerability, stimulation intensity will begin at 60% to 70% of the motor threshold and will slowly increase as the patient tolerates to 110% of the patient's motor threshold over the first few treatment sessions.

    “To ensure that the participants can tolerate the treatment, stimulation intensity will begin at 60% to 70% of the MT intensity and will slowly increase as the patient tolerates to 110% of the patient’s MT intensity over the first few treatment sessions [42].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [42] source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    For safety, the study will exclude persons with contraindications to TMS or MRI because of increased risk of adverse events.

    “For safety, we will exclude persons with contraindications to TMS or MRI because of increased risk of AEs.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    The study protocol was reviewed and approved by the Edward Hines, Jr. VA Hospital Institutional Review Board and the University of Illinois, Chicago Institutional Review Board.

    “The study protocol was reviewed and approved by the Edward Hines, Jr. VA Hospital Institutional Review Board (Hines IRB number 1716074) and the University of Illinois, Chicago Institutional Review Board.”
    • Also stated in: § Results · plain
      “This study protocol was approved by the Edward Hines, Jr. VA Hospital Institutional Review Board (Hines IRB number 14-003).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The Alcohol Use Disorder Identification Test has AUROC=0.891 (high).

    “AUROCk=0.891 (high) [101]”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [101] source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 has Cronbach alpha=0.94 (very high) and test-retest reliability rtt=0.82 (high).

    “Cronbach α=0.94 (very high) and test-retest reliability (rtt=0.82) (high) [116]”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [116] source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The Neurobehavioral Symptom Inventory has Cronbach alpha=0.81-0.96 (very high).

    “Cronbach α=0.81-0.96 (very high) [98]”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [98] source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The Ohio State TBI Identification Method has interrater reliability greater than 90% (very high).

    “Interrater reliability >90% (very high) [92]”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [92] source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    A single unblinded study team member will determine which participants are randomly placed in the active or sham groups.

    “A single unblinded study team member will determine which participants are randomly placed in the active or sham groups.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    By inducing modulation and neuroplasticity to the VMPFC and limbic system, iTBS at the frontal pole offers a promising means of mitigating impulsive behaviors and decreasing SI by increasing connectivity and undoing limbic damage caused by mTBI.

    “By inducing modulation and neuroplasticity to the VMPFC and limbic system, iTBS at the frontal pole offers a promising means of mitigating impulsive behaviors and decreasing SI by increasing connectivity and undoing limbic damage caused by mTBI.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    Any seizure will result in stopping the intervention and withdrawal from the study.

    “Any seizure will result in stopping the intervention and withdrawal from the study.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    The study will collect 10 validated, psychometric, quantitative outcome measures before, during, and after the intervention.

    “We will collect 10 validated, psychometric, quantitative outcome measures before, during, and after the intervention.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The Social and Occupational Functioning Assessment Scale has weighted K=0.95 (very high).

    “Weighted K=0.95 (very high) [107]”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [107] source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    The study will exclude participants whose SI is active, with intent and plan, as they require emergency psychiatric intervention.

    “We will also exclude participants whose SI is active, with intent and plan, as they require emergency psychiatric intervention.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale has internal validity a=0.95 and test-retest reliability rtt=0.90-1.0 (very high).

    “Internal validity a=0.95 and test-retest reliability rtt=0.90-1.0 (very high) [93,94]”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [93] source
    • cites [94] source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    The proposed study is a pilot, prospective, randomized, double-blinded, sham-controlled study to develop a frontal pole iTBS intervention.

    “The proposed study is a pilot, prospective, randomized, double-blinded, sham-controlled study to develop a frontal pole iTBS intervention.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    Pain and tolerability measures will be completed at the end of every session to assess daily pain and session tolerability.

    “Pain and tolerability measures will be completed at the end of every session to assess daily pain and session tolerability.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    All iTBS sessions will be videotaped to monitor for safety and allow for review in case of an adverse event.

    “All iTBS sessions will be videotaped to monitor for safety and allow for review in case of an AE.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Study design and conductreasoning

    mTBI must have occurred at least 1 year before enrollment to ensure that the injury has stabilized.

    “mTBI must have occurred at least 1 year before enrollment to ensure that the injury has stabilized.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    Research staff will complete a TMS safety rating scale before and after every iTBS session to assess for changes from baseline for vital signs, sleep duration, fatigue level, recent seizures, and tinnitus.

    “Research staff will complete a TMS safety rating scale before and after every iTBS session to assess for changes from baseline for vital signs, sleep duration, fatigue level, recent seizures, and tinnitus.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    Participants will be clinically monitored for seizure by trained research staff.

    “Participants will be clinically monitored for seizure by trained research staff.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The Veteran's RAND has Cronbach alpha=0.78-0.93 depending on the domain (high-very high).

    “Cronbach α=0.78-0.93 depending on the domain (high-very high) [112]”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [112] 36-item short form survey (SF-36) scoring instructionsRAND Corporation2024-07-16https://www.rand.org/health-care/surveys_tools/mos/36-item-short-form/scoring.html

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    This study does not select targets based on resting-state data.

    “This study does not select targets based on resting-state data; however, in collecting these data in tandem using neuronavigation, we can potentially target more specific sites in the future.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductreasoning

    To enhance generalizability, the study will include veterans regardless of previous combat or deployment experience.

    “To enhance generalizability, we will include veterans regardless of previous combat or deployment experience.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    Variability in baseline characteristics of the patient population may impact the study findings.

    “Variability in the baseline characteristics of the patient population (ie, co-occurring psychiatric and somatic conditions, coadministration of other medications, etc) that are being studied in detail in this project may impact our findings.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    All analyses will be corrected for multiple comparisons using false-discovery rate correction.

    “All analyses will be corrected for multiple comparisons using false-discovery rate correction.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology, Self-Report has Cronbach alpha=0.94 (very high) and test-retest reliability rtt=0.82 (high).

    “Cronbach α=0.94 (very high) and test-retest reliability rtt=0.82 (high) [118]”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [118] source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductcitation

    In developing this protocol, the authors referenced the SPIRIT guidelines.

    “In developing this protocol, we referenced the SPIRIT (Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials) guidelines [85].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [85] source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    The analysis will adjust for a priori covariates including age, sex, and baseline psychiatric diagnoses.

    “We will adjust for a priori covariates, including age, sex, and baseline psychiatric diagnoses.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    The study is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05647044).

    “The study is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05647044).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    The study is designed in accordance with the ethical standards of the US VA Office of Research and Development, based on those from the Declaration of Helsinki, the Belmont Report, US Common Rule and Regulations from the Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences.

    “This study is designed in accordance with the ethical standards of the US VA Office of Research and Development, based on those from the Declaration of Helsinki, the Belmont Report, US Common Rule and Regulations from the Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    The sham stimulation looks, sounds, and feels like active stimulation.

    “Thus, the sham stimulation looks, sounds, and feels like active stimulation.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The Buss-Perry Aggressiveness Scale has test-retest reliability rtt=0.80 (high) and Cronbach alpha=0.68-0.8 for each subscale (moderate-high).

    “Test-retest reliability rtt=0.80 (high), Cronbach α=0.68-0.8 for each subscale (moderate-high) [108]”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [108] source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    The sham coil and scalp electrodes will be placed in the same location for all participants and will mimic the sensation produced by the active coil but will not alter brain physiology.

    “The sham coil and scalp electrodes will be placed in the same location for all participants and will mimic the sensation produced by the active coil but will not alter brain physiology.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    A thorough chart review will be completed to cross-reference current medications with study eligibility criteria to identify antiepileptics or medications that could lower the seizure threshold.

    “A thorough chart review will be completed to cross-reference current medications with study eligibility criteria to identify antiepileptics or medications that could lower the seizure threshold.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The Stroop Color & Word Test has reliability estimates ranging from a=0.83 to a=0.91 and test-retest reliability ranging from rtt=0.79 to rtt=0.97 (all high-very high).

    “Reliability estimates range from a=0.83 to a=0.91 and test-retest reliability ranges from rtt=0.79 to rtt=0.97 (all high-very high) [124]”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [124] source
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    The small sample size reduces the study power, which may limit the detection of statistically significant outcome differences.

    “The small sample size reduces the study power, which may limit the detection of statistically significant outcome differences.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    The active and sham iTBS coils are visually identical.

    “The coil is identical visually for the sham and active conditions.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductreasoning

    The Localite neuronavigation system and an MRI instrument marker will be used at every iTBS session to ensure precise and repeatable coil positioning over the frontal pole FP2 site.

    “To ensure precise and repeatable coil positioning over the frontal pole FP2 site, the Localite (neuronavigation) system and an MRI instrument marker will be used at every iTBS session.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    The total sample size will be 56 with 28 in the active iTBS group and 28 in the sham iTBS group.

    “Thus, our total sample size will be 56 with 28 in the active iTBS group and 28 in the sham iTBS group.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    Veterans and researchers will wear headphones connected to a noise generator during treatment to hear active iTBS for both conditions, thereby maintaining the blind.

    “Veterans and researchers will wear headphones connected to the noise generator during treatment to hear active iTBS for both conditions, thereby maintaining the blind.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
77 of 77
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    No established treatment approach has used VMPFC iTBS to improve social and occupational functioning, SI, and negative urgency impulsivity among individuals with mTBI and comorbid mental illness.

    “To the best of our knowledge, no established treatment approach has used VMPFC iTBS to improve social and occupational functioning, SI, and negative urgency impulsivity among individuals with mTBI and comorbid mental illness.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    No neuroimaging evidence implicates specific brain regions in mTBI-related impulsivity and SI.

    “To the best of our knowledge, no neuroimaging evidence implicates specific brain regions in mTBI-related impulsivity and SI.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Evidence is scarce to directly support biological treatments for SI, impulsivity, and functional deficits following mTBI.

    “However, the evidence is scarce to directly support biological treatments for SI, impulsivity, and functional deficits following mTBI.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    Equal variance can be assumed between the test and control groups.

    “We will assume equal variance between test and control groups [128].”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    A normal distribution can be assumed for the neuroimaging connectivity data.

    “We will assume a normal distribution and use Fisher’s Z test to compare active-iTBS and sham-iTBS groups, both before and after treatment [133].”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    There are no widely established treatments for poorer functional outcomes, suicidality, or impulsivity that occur in the context of mTBI.

    “First, there are no widely established treatments for poorer functional outcomes, suicidality, or impulsivity that occur in the context of mTBI.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Compared with traditional pharmacological and behavioral approaches, iTBS has a reduced latency to treatment response, which could be lifesaving among individuals with suicidal ideation.

    “Compared with traditional pharmacological and behavioral approaches, iTBS has a reduced latency to treatment response, which could be lifesaving among individuals with SI.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    This protocol represents the first pilot randomized controlled trial for frontal pole iTBS for mTBI, negative urgency impulsivity, and suicidality.

    “This novel protocol represents the first pilot RCT for frontal pole iTBS for mTBI, negative urgency impulsivity, and suicidality.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The study uses an established FDA-approved device readily available in both VA and civilian health care systems throughout the United States.

    “First, the study uses an established FDA-approved device readily available in both VA and civilian health care systems throughout the United States.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Our approach differs from previous studies that primarily focused on improving suicidal ideation via the treatment of depressive symptoms.

    “Our approach also differs from previous studies that primarily focused on improving SI via the treatment of depressive symptoms.”
10 of 10

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Alcohol screening instrument differs between the text and table

    Major

    The screening description specifies the Alcohol Use Disorder Identification Test-Consumption Questions, whereas Table 1 specifies a 10-item Alcohol Use Disorder Identification Test.

  • Different stimulation coils are specified for the intervention

    Major

    The experimental-intervention section specifies C-B60 active and placebo coils, but the blinding procedures specify a B65 A/P coil for active and sham iTBS.

  • Two different IRB numbers are given for the study protocol

    Minor

    The abstract identifies 14-003 as the protocol's Hines IRB number, while the ethics section identifies 1716074. The recruitment section separately identifies 14-003 as the number for a TBI Data Repository.

  • The stated train schedule does not deliver 1800 pulses

    Minor

    At one 2-second train every 10 seconds, 570 seconds allows 57 trains. Each train contains ten 3-pulse bursts at 200-millisecond intervals, yielding 1710 pulses rather than the stated 1800.

4 of 4

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Ramchand, R, 2022, Rand Health Q, 9, 21
  2. ReidLDFingarKRInpatient stays and emergency department visits involving traumatic brain injury, 2017Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) & Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ)2024-04-29https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK556732/pdf/Bookshelf_NBK556732.pdf
  3. Silver, JM, 2011, Textbook of Traumatic Brain Injury. 2nd edition
  4. First, MB, 2016, User's Guide for the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-5® Disorders—Clinician Version (SCID-5-CV)

Cited by

Still being checked.

Authors
Bernanke, A., Hasley, R., Sabetfakhri, N., de Wit, H., Smith, B. M., Wang, L., Brenner, L. A., Hanlon, C., Philip, N. S., Ajilore, O., Herrold, A., & Aaronson, A.
Affiliations
  • Northwestern University (US)
  • Edward Hines, Jr. VA Hospital (US)
  • University of Illinois Chicago (US)
  • Veterans Health Administration (US)
  • The Ohio State University (US)
  • University of Colorado Anschutz (US)
  • BrainsWay (Israel) (IL)
  • Providence VA Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Aaronson, Alexandra
Venue
JMIR Research Protocols
Published
2024-12-13
Volume
13
Pages
e58206
ISSN
1929-0748 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4402524554
Cited by
2
References
137
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1
FWCI
0.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • JMIR Research Protocols (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (IK2 RX002938, IK2 RX004298)
  • Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
  • University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
  • Rehabilitation Research and Development Service
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R25 MH115855)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Traumatic Brain Injury Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Electroconvulsive Therapy Studies
Keywords
intermittent theta burst stimulation, repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation, mild traumatic brain injury, veterans, impulsivity, suicidal ideation, suicide attempts, ventromedial prefrontal cortex, frontal pole, neuromodulation, post-traumatic stress disorder, depressive symptoms, neuroplasticity, co-occurring mental health disorders
MeSH terms
Adult, Mental Disorders, Brain Concussion, Female, Frontal Lobe, Humans, Impulsive Behavior, Male, Middle Aged, Pilot Projects, United States, Veterans, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation, Suicidal Ideation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-28.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-28.

Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review