The DOI matches its Crossref record; 24 of the 24 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Robotic-assisted TKA Reduces Postoperative Alignment Outliers and Improves Gap Balance Compared to Conventional TKA
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Several studies have shown mechanical alignment influences the outcome of TKA. Robotic systems have been developed to improve the precision and accuracy of achieving component position and mechanical alignment. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We determined whether robotic-assisted implantation for TKA (1) improved clinical outcome; (2) improved mechanical axis alignment and implant inclination in the coronal and sagittal planes; (3) improved the balance (flexion and extension gaps); and (4) reduced complications, postoperative drainage, and operative time when compared to conventionally implanted TKA over an intermediate-term (minimum 3-year) followup period. METHODS: We prospectively randomized 100 patients who underwent unilateral TKA into one of two groups: 50 using a robotic-assisted procedure and 50 using conventional manual techniques. Outcome variables considered were postoperative ROM, WOMAC scores, Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) knee scores, mechanical axis alignment, flexion/extension gap balance, complications, postoperative drainage, and operative time. Minimum followup was 41 months (mean, 65 months; range, 41-81 months). RESULTS: There were no differences in postoperative ROM, WOMAC scores, and HSS knee scores. The robotic-assisted group resulted in no mechanical axis outliers (> ± 3° from neutral) compared to 24% in the conventional group. There were fewer robotic-assisted knees where the flexion gap exceeded the extension gap by 2 mm. The robotic-assisted procedures took an average of 25 minutes longer than the conventional procedures but had less postoperative blood drainage. There were no differences in complications between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Robotic-assisted TKA appears to reduce the number of mechanical axis alignment outliers and improve the ability to achieve flexion-extension gap balance, without any differences in clinical scores or complications when compared to conventional manual techniques.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Dindo, D., Demartines, N., & Clavien, P.-A. (2004) · Annals of Surgery · doi:10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae · Cited by 31,378
The Knee Society Total Knee Arthroplasty Roentgenographic Evaluation and Scoring System
Ewald, F. C. (1989) · Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research · doi:10.1097/00003086-198911000-00003 · Cited by 1,971
Coronal alignment after total knee replacement
Jeffery, R., Morris, R., & Denham, R. (1991) · The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British volume · doi:10.1302/0301-620x.73b5.1894655 · Cited by 1,100
Postoperative Alignment of Total Knee Replacement Its Effect on Survival
RITTER, M. A., FARIS, P. M., KEATING, E. M., & MEDING, J. B. (1994) · Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research · doi:10.1097/00003086-199402000-00021 · Cited by 1,008
A comparison of four models of total knee-replacement prostheses
Insall, J., Ranawat, C., Aglietti, P., & Shine, J. (1976) · The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery · doi:10.2106/00004623-197658060-00003 · Cited by 867
Parratte, S., Pagnano, M. W., Trousdale, R. T., & Berry, D. J. (2010) · The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-American Volume · doi:10.2106/jbjs.i.01398 · Cited by 808
The Effect of Alignment and BMI on Failure of Total Knee Replacement
Ritter, M. A., Davis, K. E., Meding, J. B., Pierson, J. L., Berend, M. E., & Malinzak, R. A. (2011) · Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery · doi:10.2106/jbjs.j.00772 · Cited by 669
WASIELEWSKI, R. C., GALANTE, J. O., LEIGHTY, R. M., NATARAJAN, R. N., & ROSENBERG, A. G. (1994) · Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research · doi:10.1097/00003086-199402000-00005 · Cited by 563
Meta-Analysis of Alignment Outcomes in Computer-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty Surgery
Mason, J. B., Fehring, T. K., Estok, R., Banel, D., & Fahrbach, K. (2007) · The Journal of Arthroplasty · doi:10.1016/j.arth.2007.08.001 · Cited by 548
The Transepicondylar Axis Approximates the Optimal Flexion Axis of the Knee
Churchill, D. L., Incavo, S. J., Johnson, C. C., & Beynnon, B. D. (1998) · Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research · doi:10.1097/00003086-199811000-00016 · Cited by 497
Cited by
van der List, J. P., Chawla, H., Joskowicz, L., & Pearle, A. D. (2016) · Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy · doi:10.1007/s00167-016-4305-9 · Cited by 200
Metadata
- Authors
- Song, E.-K., Seon, J.-K., Yim, J.-H., Netravali, N. A., & Bargar, W. L.
- Venue
- Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
- Published
- 2013-01
- Volume
- 471
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 118-126
- ISSN
- 0009-921X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2124279574
- Cited by
- 447
- References
- 24
- FWCI
- 7.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Robotic-assisted TKA Reduces Postoperative Alignment Outliers and Improves Gap Balance Compared to Conventional TKA. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s11999-012-2407-3
- The paper
- Song, E.-K., Seon, J.-K., Yim, J.-H., Netravali, N. A., & Bargar, W. L. (2013). Robotic-assisted TKA Reduces Postoperative Alignment Outliers and Improves Gap Balance Compared to Conventional TKA. Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-012-2407-3
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.