The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Effect of Alignment and BMI on Failure of Total Knee Replacement
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of tibiofemoral alignment, femoral and tibial component alignment, and body-mass index (BMI) on implant survival following total knee replacement. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 6070 knees in 3992 patients with a minimum of two years of follow-up. Each knee was classified on the basis of postoperative alignment (overall tibiofemoral alignment and alignment of the tibial and the femoral component in the coronal plane). Failures (defined as revision for any reason other than infection) were analyzed with use of Cox regression; patient covariates included overall alignment, component alignments, and preoperative BMI. RESULTS: Failure was most likely to occur if the orientation of the tibial component was <90° relative to the tibial axis and the orientation of the femoral component was ≥8° of valgus (failure rate, 8.7%; p < 0.0001). In contrast, failure was least likely to occur if both the tibial and the femoral component were in a neutral orientation (≥90° and <8° of valgus, respectively) (failure rate, 0.2% [nine of 4633]; p < 0.0001). "Correction" of varus or valgus malalignment of the first implanted component by placement of the second component to attain neutral tibiofemoral alignment was associated with a failure rate of 3.2% (p = 0.4922) for varus tibial malalignment and 7.8% (p = 0.0082) for valgus femoral malalignment. A higher BMI was associated with an increased failure rate. Compared with patients with a BMI of 23 to 26 kg/m2, the failure rate in patients with a BMI of ≥41 kg/m2 increased from 0.7% to 2.6% (p = 0.0046) in well-aligned knees, from 1.6% to 2.9% (p = 0.0180) in varus knees, and from 1.0% to 7.1% (p = 0.0260) in valgus knees. CONCLUSIONS: Attaining neutrality in all three alignments is important in maximizing total knee implant survival. Substantial "correction" of the alignment of one component in order to compensate for malalignment of the other component and thus produce a neutrally aligned total knee replacement can increase the risk of failure (p = 0.0082). The use of conventional guides to align a total knee replacement provides acceptable alignment; however, the surgeon should be aware that the patient's size, as determined by the BMI, is also a major factor in total knee replacement failure.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Obesity and Total Joint Arthroplasty
(2013) · The Journal of Arthroplasty · doi:10.1016/j.arth.2013.02.011 · Cited by 373
Niki, Y., Nagura, T., Nagai, K., Kobayashi, S., & Harato, K. (2018) · Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy · doi:10.1007/s00167-017-4788-z · Cited by 129
Orsi, A. D., Wakelin, E., Plaskos, C., McMahon, S., & Coffey, S. (2023) · Arthroplasty Today · doi:10.1016/j.artd.2022.101090 · Cited by 30
Kim, R., Wakelin, E. A., Plaskos, C., Gupta, S., & Putman, S. (2023) · International Orthopaedics · doi:10.1007/s00264-022-05636-2 · Cited by 20
Cote, M. P., & Lubowitz, J. H. (2024) · Arthroscopy · doi:10.1016/j.arthro.2023.12.027 · Cited by 8
Metadata
- Authors
- Ritter, M. A., Davis, K. E., Meding, J. B., Pierson, J. L., Berend, M. E., & Malinzak, R. A.
- Venue
- Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery
- Published
- 2011-09-07
- Volume
- 93
- Issue
- 17
- Pages
- 1588-1596
- ISSN
- 0021-9355 (ISSN-L)
- 1535-1386
- OpenAlex
- W2007535907
- Cited by
- 669
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 26.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Effect of Alignment and BMI on Failure of Total Knee Replacement. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2106/jbjs.j.00772
- The paper
- Ritter, M. A., Davis, K. E., Meding, J. B., Pierson, J. L., Berend, M. E., & Malinzak, R. A. (2011). The Effect of Alignment and BMI on Failure of Total Knee Replacement. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.j.00772
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.