Cited by 55Orthopedic Surgery and RehabilitationMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationPsychometric Methodologies and Testing

Abbreviated psychologic questionnaires are valid in patients with hand conditions

Open access
Bot, Arjan G. J., Becker, Stéphanie J. E., van Dijk, Niek C., Ring, David, Vranceanu, Ana-Maria·2013·Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) and Short Health Anxiety Inventory (SHAI) can help hand surgeons identify opportunities for psychologic support, but they are time consuming. If easier-to-use tools were available and valid, they might be widely adopted. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We tested the validity of shorter versions of the PCS and SHAI, the PCS-4 and the SHAI-5, by assessing: (1) the difference in mean scaled scores of the short and long questionnaires; (2) floor and ceiling effects between the short and long questionnaires; (3) correlation between the short questionnaires and the outcome measures (an indication of construct validity); and (4) variability in disability and pain, between the short and long questionnaires. METHODS: One hundred sixty-four new or followup adult patients in one hand surgery clinic completed the SHAI-18, SHAI-5, PCS-13, PCS-4, Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ)-9, PHQ-2, DASH, and QuickDASH questionnaires, and an ordinal pain scale, as part of a prospective cross-sectional study. Mean scores for the short and long questionnaires were compared with paired t-tests. Floor and ceiling effects were calculated. Pearson's correlation was used to assess the correlation between the short and long questionnaires and with outcome measures. Regression analyses were performed to find predictors of pain and disability. RESULTS: There were small, but significant differences between the mean scores for the DASH and QuickDASH (QuickDASH higher), SHAI-18 and SHAI-5 (SHAI-18 higher), and PCS-13 and PCS-4 (PCS-4 higher), but not the PHQ-9 and PHQ-2. Floor effects ranged between 0% and 65% and ceiling effects between 0% and 3%. There were greater floor effects for the PHQ-2 than for the PHQ-9, but floor and ceiling effects were otherwise comparable for the other short and long questionnaires. All questionnaires showed convergent and divergent validity and criterion validity was shown in multivariable analyses. CONCLUSIONS: Content validity, construct convergent validity, and criterion validity were established for the short versions of the PCS and SHAI. Using shorter forms creates small differences in mean values that we believe are unlikely to affect study results and are more efficient and advantageous because of the decreased responder burden.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11999-013-3213-2

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 33 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bot, A. G. J., Becker, S. J. E., van Dijk, N. C., Ring, D., & Vranceanu, A.-M.
Affiliations
Harvard University (US)
Venue
Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
Published
2013-12
Volume
471
Issue
12
Pages
4037-4044
ISSN
0009-921X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1975355776
Cited by
55
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 11 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3
FWCI
4.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
Keywords
Pain Catastrophizing Scale, Short Health Anxiety Inventory, short-form questionnaire, psychometric validity, hand conditions, hand surgery, pain catastrophizing, health anxiety, depression screening, Patient Health Questionnaire, DASH, QuickDASH, floor and ceiling effects
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Anxiety, Disability Evaluation, Female, Hand, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Pain, Pain Measurement, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Psychometrics, Surveys and Questionnaires, Catastrophization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review