Cited by 9

Gunshot trauma in human long bones: towards practical diagnostic guidance for forensic anthropologists

Veenstra, Anika, Kerkhoff, Wim, Oostra, Roelof-Jan, Galtés, Ignasi·2022·Forensic Science, Medicine and Pathology

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s12024-022-00479-0

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Studies on human long bones are starting to shift from a general description and focus on the fractures' pathophysiology or the ballistic variables towards a more detailed assessment of macroscopic fracture characteristics themselves.

    “Studies on human long bones are starting to shift from a general description and focus on the fractures’ pathophysiology or the ballistic variables towards a more detailed assessment of macroscopic fracture characteristics themselves [3,5,10].”

    From Osteonal Damage Patterns from Ballistic and Blunt Force Trauma in Human Long Bones (2024) · cites this paper as [5]

    The available passages labeled Abstract contain bibliographic metadata, not a discussion of research trends. Searches for “macroscopic,” “pathophysiology,” and fracture-characteristic terminology found no passage addressing the claimed shift from ballistic variables to macroscopic fracture assessment. (LLM, conf=0.72)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Long bones hit by a bullet are primarily fractured due to hydraulic pressure built up in the bone marrow, generated by the temporary cavity, which acts in all directions across the whole cortical bone, causing the diaphysis to split open from within and shatter.

    “Long bones hit by a bullet are primarily fractured due to the hydraulic pressure built up in the bone marrow (generated by the temporary cavity), which acts in all directions across the whole cortical bone, causing the diaphysis to split open from within and shatter [5,31].”

    From Osteonal Damage Patterns from Ballistic and Blunt Force Trauma in Human Long Bones (2024) · cites this paper as [5]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 0 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 2 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Animal bones do not have the same biomechanical properties and fracture production as human bone.

    “Caution should be taken when interpreting findings from animal bones as they do not have the same biomechanical properties and fracture production as human bone [5,10,36].”
  • Distinguishing between BFT and GST in long bones can be challenging when fractures are comminuted or incompletely recovered.

    “Distinguishing between BFT and GST in long bones can be challenging when fractures are comminuted or incompletely recovered [3,5,26].”
  • Despite biomechanical differences between GST and BFT, it can be challenging to interpret and reconstruct with certainty the type of trauma in fractured long bones, particularly when dealing with comminuted fractures or incompletely recovered fractured bones.

    “Despite the biomechanical differences between gunshot trauma (GST) and blunt force trauma (BFT), it can be challenging to interpret and reconstruct with certainty the type of trauma in fractured long bones [3,5], particularly when dealing with comminuted fractures or”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Veenstra, A., Kerkhoff, W., Oostra, R.-J., & Galtés, I.
Venue
Forensic Science, Medicine and Pathology
Published
2022-04-22
Volume
18
Issue
3
Pages
359-367
ISSN
  • 1547-769X
  • 1556-2891
Cited by
9
References
1
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review