Cited by 257Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular DisturbancesTraumatic Brain Injury ResearchAnesthesia and Sedative Agents

The ketamine effect on ICP in traumatic brain injury

Zeiler, F. A., Teitelbaum, J., West, M., Gillman, L. M.·2014·Neurocritical Care

Abstract

Our goal was to perform a systematic review of the literature on the use of ketamine in traumatic brain injury (TBI) and its effects on intracranial pressure (ICP). All articles from MEDLINE, BIOSIS, EMBASE, Global Health, HealthStar, Scopus, Cochrane Library, the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (inception to November 2013), reference lists of relevant articles, and gray literature were searched. Two reviewers independently identified all manuscripts pertaining to the administration of ketamine in human TBI patients that recorded effects on ICP. Secondary outcomes of effect on cerebral perfusion pressure, mean arterial pressure, patient outcome, and adverse effects were recorded. Two reviewers independently extracted data including population characteristics and treatment characteristics. The strength of evidence was adjudicated using both the Oxford and GRADE methodology. Our search strategy produced a total 371 citations. Seven articles, six manuscripts and one meeting proceeding, were considered for the review with all utilizing ketamine, while documenting ICP in severe TBI patients. All studies were prospective studies. Five and two studies pertained to adults and pediatrics, respectively. Across all studies, of the 101 adult and 55 pediatric patients described, ICP did not increase in any of the studies during ketamine administration. Three studies reported a significant decrease in ICP with ketamine bolus. Cerebral perfusion pressure and mean blood press…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s12028-013-9950-y

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Concerns that ketamine may raise intracranial pressure and worsen outcomes in TBI is not supported by evidence.

    “Concerns that ketamine may raise intracranial pressure and worsen outcomes in TBI is not supported by evidence.61,62”

    From Airway Management in Trauma (2018) · cites this paper as [62]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zeiler, F. A., Teitelbaum, J., West, M., & Gillman, L. M.
Affiliations
  • University of Manitoba (CA)
  • Montreal Neurological Institute and Hospital (CA)
Corresponding author
Zeiler, F. A.
Venue
Neurocritical Care
Published
2014-02-11
Volume
21
Issue
1
Pages
163-173
ISSN
  • 1541-6933 (ISSN-L)
  • 1556-0961
OpenAlex
W2047273182
Cited by
257
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 37 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 27 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 1
FWCI
10.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neurocritical Care (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Traumatic Brain Injury Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Anesthesia and Sedative Agents
Keywords
ketamine, traumatic brain injury, intracranial pressure, cerebral perfusion pressure, vasopressors, sedation, mechanical ventilation, adverse effects, pediatric traumatic brain injury
MeSH terms
Adult, Anesthetics, Dissociative, Brain Injuries, Child, Humans, Intracranial Pressure, Ketamine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review