The ketamine effect on ICP in traumatic brain injury
Abstract
Our goal was to perform a systematic review of the literature on the use of ketamine in traumatic brain injury (TBI) and its effects on intracranial pressure (ICP). All articles from MEDLINE, BIOSIS, EMBASE, Global Health, HealthStar, Scopus, Cochrane Library, the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (inception to November 2013), reference lists of relevant articles, and gray literature were searched. Two reviewers independently identified all manuscripts pertaining to the administration of ketamine in human TBI patients that recorded effects on ICP. Secondary outcomes of effect on cerebral perfusion pressure, mean arterial pressure, patient outcome, and adverse effects were recorded. Two reviewers independently extracted data including population characteristics and treatment characteristics. The strength of evidence was adjudicated using both the Oxford and GRADE methodology. Our search strategy produced a total 371 citations. Seven articles, six manuscripts and one meeting proceeding, were considered for the review with all utilizing ketamine, while documenting ICP in severe TBI patients. All studies were prospective studies. Five and two studies pertained to adults and pediatrics, respectively. Across all studies, of the 101 adult and 55 pediatric patients described, ICP did not increase in any of the studies during ketamine administration. Three studies reported a significant decrease in ICP with ketamine bolus. Cerebral perfusion pressure and mean blood press…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Concerns that ketamine may raise intracranial pressure and worsen outcomes in TBI is not supported by evidence.
“Concerns that ketamine may raise intracranial pressure and worsen outcomes in TBI is not supported by evidence.61,62”
From Airway Management in Trauma (2018) · cites this paper as [62]
Cites
GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations
Guyatt, G. H., Oxman, A. D., Vist, G. E., Kunz, R., Falck-Ytter, Y., Alonso-Coello, P., & Schünemann, H. J. (2008) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.39489.470347.ad · Cited by 23,305 · see citing works
What is ‘quality of evidence’ and why is it important to clinicians?
Guyatt, G. H., Oxman, A. D., Kunz, R., Vist, G. E., Falck-Ytter, Y., & Schünemann, H. J. (2008) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.39490.551019.be · Cited by 3,250 · see citing works
Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations for diagnostic tests and strategies
Schünemann, H. J., Oxman, A. D., Brozek, J., Glasziou, P., Jaeschke, R., Vist, G. E., Williams, J. W., Kunz, R., Craig, J., Montori, V. M., et al. (2008) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.39500.677199.ae · Cited by 1,782 · see citing works
Use of GRADE grid to reach decisions on clinical practice guidelines when consensus is elusive
Jaeschke, R., Guyatt, G. H., Dellinger, P., Schunemann, H., Levy, M. M., Kunz, R., Norris, S., Bion, J., & for the GRADE working group (2008) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.a744 · Cited by 577 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Kovacs, G., & Sowers, N. (2018) · Emergency Medicine Clinics of North America · doi:10.1016/j.emc.2017.08.006 · Cited by 115 · see citing works
Sedation and analgesia for procedures in the pediatric emergency room
Ramalho, C. E., Bretas, P. M. C., Schvartsman, C., & Reis, A. G. (2017) · Jornal de Pediatria · doi:10.1016/j.jped.2017.07.009 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
- Authors
- Zeiler, F. A., Teitelbaum, J., West, M., & Gillman, L. M.
- Affiliations
- University of Manitoba (CA)
- Montreal Neurological Institute and Hospital (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Zeiler, F. A.
- Venue
- Neurocritical Care
- Published
- 2014-02-11
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 163-173
- ISSN
- 1541-6933 (ISSN-L)
- 1556-0961
- OpenAlex
- W2047273182
- Cited by
- 257
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 22 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 37 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 27 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 10.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Neurocritical Care (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Traumatic Brain Injury Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Anesthesia and Sedative Agents
- Keywords
- ketamine, traumatic brain injury, intracranial pressure, cerebral perfusion pressure, vasopressors, sedation, mechanical ventilation, adverse effects, pediatric traumatic brain injury
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Anesthetics, Dissociative, Brain Injuries, Child, Humans, Intracranial Pressure, Ketamine
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review