The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A Systematic Review of the Burden of Pancreatic Cancer in Europe: Real-World Impact on Survival, Quality of Life and Costs
Open accessAbstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to assess the overall burden of pancreatic cancer in Europe, with a focus on survival time in a real-world setting, and the overall healthy life lost to the disease. Methods: Real-world data were retrieved from peer-reviewed, observational studies identified by an electronic search. We performed two de novo analyses: a proportional shortfall analysis to quantify the proportion of healthy life lost to pancreatic cancer and an estimation of the aggregate life-years lost annually in Europe. Results: Ninety-one studies were included. The median, age-standardised incidence of pancreatic cancer per 100,000 was 7.6 in men and 4.9 in women. Overall median survival from diagnosis was 4.6 months; median survival was 2.8–5.7 months in patients with metastatic disease. The proportional shortfall analysis showed that pancreatic cancer results in a 98 % loss of healthy life, with a life expectancy at diagnosis of 4.6 months compared to 15.1 years for an age-matched healthy population. Annually, 610,000–915,000 quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) are lost to pancreatic cancer in Europe. Patients had significantly lower scores on validated health-related quality of life instruments versus population norms. Conclusions: To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to systematically review real-world overall survival and patient outcomes of pancreatic cancer patients in Europe outside the context of clinical trials. Our findings confirm the poor prognosis and short survival reported by national studies. Pancreatic cancer is a substantial burden in Europe, with nearly a million aggregate life-years lost annually and almost complete loss of healthy life in affected individuals.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Epidemiology of Pancreatic Cancer: Global Trends, Etiology and Risk Factors
Rawla, P., Sunkara, T., & Gaduputi, V. (2019) · World Journal of Oncology · doi:10.14740/wjon1166 · Cited by 2,269
Wang-Gillam, A., Hubner, R. A., Siveke, J. T., Von Hoff, D. D., Belanger, B., de Jong, F. A., Mirakhur, B., & Chen, L.-T. (2019) · European Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2018.12.007 · Cited by 342
Dalgleish, A. G., Stebbing, J., Adamson, D. J., Arif, S. S., Bidoli, P., Chang, D., Cheeseman, S., Diaz-Beveridge, R., Fernandez-Martos, C., Glynne-Jones, R., et al. (2016) · British Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1038/bjc.2016.271 · Cited by 75
Malhotra, A., Rachet, B., Bonaventure, A., Pereira, S. P., & Woods, L. M. (2021) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0251876 · Cited by 56
Fang, C., Markuzon, N., Patel, N., & Rueda, J.-D. (2022) · Value in Health · doi:10.1016/j.jval.2022.06.004 · Cited by 36
Metadata
- Authors
- Carrato, A., Falcone, A., Ducreux, M., Valle, J. W., Parnaby, A., Djazouli, K., Alnwick-Allu, K., Hutchings, A., Palaska, C., & Parthenaki, I.
- Venue
- Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer
- Published
- 2015-05-14
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 201-211
- ISSN
- 1941-6628 (ISSN-L)
- 1941-6636
- OpenAlex
- W1563878414
- Cited by
- 270
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Systematic Review of the Burden of Pancreatic Cancer in Europe: Real-World Impact on Survival, Quality of Life and Costs. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s12029-015-9724-1
- The paper
- Carrato, A., Falcone, A., Ducreux, M., Valle, J. W., Parnaby, A., Djazouli, K., Alnwick-Allu, K., Hutchings, A., Palaska, C., & Parthenaki, I. (2015). A Systematic Review of the Burden of Pancreatic Cancer in Europe: Real-World Impact on Survival, Quality of Life and Costs. Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12029-015-9724-1
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.