Cited by 22Cervical Cancer and HPV ResearchReproductive tract infections researchEndometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments

HR-HPV viral load quality detection provide more accurate prediction for residual lesions after treatment: a prospective cohort study in patients with high-grade squamous lesions or worse

Chen, Lihua, Dong, Binhua, Zhang, Qiaoyu, Mao, Xiaodan, Lin, Wenyu, Ruan, Guanyu, Kang, Yafang, Sun, Pengming·2020·Medical Oncology

Abstract

The relationship between high-risk-human-papillomavirus (HR-HPV) viral loads and residual/recurrence lesion is uncertain. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical value of HR-HPV viral loads to predict the residual/recurrence lesions among women with high-grade squamous lesions or worse (≥ HSIL) after surgery. Finally, 301 women who underwent primary screening of cervical cancer using polymerase-chain-reaction-(PCR)-reverse-dot-blot-(RDB) human papillomavirus (HPV) genotyping and cytology assays were enrolled. They received surgery and took HR-HPV viral loads with a BioPerfectus Multiplex Real-Time PCR assay. Colposcopy biopsies were performed in patients with HPV-16/18(+) and/or TCT ≥ ASCUS with HR-HPV(+). The risk of HR-HPV viral loads and potentials factors for residual/recurrence lesions were analyzed and the optimal cut-off values of HR-HPV viral loads were calculated. The significant differences were found in residual/recurrence lesions among patients with different ages, margin status, cytology and HR-HPV at 6 months (all P < 0.05). Interestingly, HPV viral loads were observed significant differences in the group of residual lesions, not recurrence group. Furthermore, except for HPV-31/33, the viral loads of HP-16/52/58 were significant differences in residual lesions. The cut-off level of HR-HPV viral loads was 5.22 copies/10,000 cells, providing viable triage for the risk of residual lesions. Compared with different follow-up methods, the HR-HPV viral loads ≥ 5.22co…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s12032-020-01363-z

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chen, L., Dong, B., Zhang, Q., Mao, X., Lin, W., Ruan, G., Kang, Y., & Sun, P.
Affiliations
Fujian Medical University (CN)
Corresponding author
Sun, Pengming
Venue
Medical Oncology
Published
2020-03-30
Volume
37
Issue
5
Pages
37-37
ISSN
  • 1357-0560 (ISSN-L)
  • 1559-131X
OpenAlex
W3013467394
Cited by
22
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 1
FWCI
1.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Medical Oncology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Fujian Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China (2017J01232)
  • Fujian Provincial Maternity and Children’s Hospital Technology Innovation Project (YCXM-19-01)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Reproductive tract infections research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments
Keywords
high-risk HPV, HPV viral load, residual lesions, recurrence, cervical cancer, HPV genotyping, HPV16, HPV52, HPV58, HPV 31, HPV 33, post-treatment follow-up, risk prediction, cut-off values, margin status
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Uterine Cervical Dysplasia, Uterine Cervical Neoplasms, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Neoplasm Recurrence, Local, Prospective Studies, Risk, Neoplasm, Residual, Viral Load, Papillomaviridae, Papillomavirus Infections, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review