Cited by 13Genetics and Neurodevelopmental DisordersNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchMemory and Neural Mechanisms

Increased Training Intensity Induces Proper Membrane Localization of Actin Remodeling Proteins in the Hippocampus Preventing Cognitive Deficits: Implications for Fragile X Syndrome

Martinez, L. A., Tejada-Simon, Maria Victoria·2018·Molecular Neurobiology

Abstract

Behavioral intervention therapy has proven beneficial in the treatment of autism and intellectual disabilities (ID), raising the possibility of certain changes in molecular mechanisms activated by these interventions that may promote learning. Fragile X syndrome (FXS) is a neurodevelopmental disorder characterized by autistic features and intellectual disability and can serve as a model to examine mechanisms that promote learning. FXS results from mutations in the fragile X mental retardation 1 gene (Fmr1) that prevents expression of the Fmr1 protein (FMRP), a messenger RNA (mRNA) translation regulator at synapses. Among many other functions, FMRP organizes a complex with the actin cytoskeleton-regulating small Rho GTPase Rac1. As in humans, Fmr1 KO mice lacking FMRP display autistic-like behaviors and deformities of actin-rich synaptic structures in addition to impaired hippocampal learning and synaptic plasticity. These features have been previously linked to proper function of actin remodeling proteins that includes Rac1. An important step in Rac1 activation and function is its translocation to the membrane, where it can influence synaptic actin cytoskeleton remodeling during hippocampus-dependent learning. Herein, we report that Fmr1 KO mouse hippocampus exhibits increased levels of membrane-bound Rac1, which may prevent proper learning-induced synaptic changes. We also determine that increasing training intensity during fear conditioning (FC) training restores contextual…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s12035-017-0666-4

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Martinez, L. A., & Tejada-Simon, M. V.
Affiliations
University of Houston (US)
Corresponding author
Tejada-Simon, Maria Victoria
Venue
Molecular Neurobiology
Published
2017-07-08
Volume
55
Issue
6
Pages
4529-4542
ISSN
  • 0893-7648 (ISSN-L)
  • 1559-1182
OpenAlex
W2725220212
Cited by
13
References
12
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1
FWCI
1.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Molecular Neurobiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • FRAXA Research Foundation
  • Fondation Jérôme Lejeune
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
Keywords
fragile X syndrome, FMRP, Fmr1 knockout mice, Rac1, actin cytoskeleton, membrane localization, hippocampus, fear conditioning, contextual memory, long-term potentiation, exercise intensity, synaptic plasticity, intellectual disability, autism spectrum disorder, cognitive impairment
MeSH terms
Actins, Animals, Cell Membrane, Conditioning, Psychological, Cytosol, Fear, Female, Fragile X Syndrome, Hippocampus, Humans, Male, Memory, Theta Rhythm, Long-Term Potentiation, Mice, Knockout, rac1 GTP-Binding Protein, Fragile X Messenger Ribonucleoprotein 1, p21-Activated Kinases, Cognitive Dysfunction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review