ChatGPT—a foe or an ally?
Open accessThe claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
RV University in Bangalore issued a strict ban prohibiting students from using ChatGPT to complete tasks, participate in exams, or laboratory tests.
“RV University in Bangalore, India, issued a strict ban that explicitly prohibits students from using Chat GPT to complete tasks, participate in exams, or laboratory tests (Yadava, 2023).”
From Reflection on whether Chat GPT should be banned by academia from the perspective of education and teaching (2023) · cites this paper as Yadava, 2023
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Kung, T. H., Cheatham, M., Medenilla, A., Sillos, C., De Leon, L., Elepaño, C., Madriaga, M., Aggabao, R., Diaz-Candido, G., Maningo, J., et al. (2023) · PLOS Digital Health · doi:10.1371/journal.pdig.0000198 · Cited by 4,115 · see citing works
ChatGPT is fun, but not an author
Thorp, H. H. (2023) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.adg7879 · Cited by 1,437 · see citing works
ChatGPT and other large language models are double-edged swords
Shen, Y., Heacock, L., Elias, J., Hentel, K. D., Reig, B., Shih, G., & Moy, L. (2023) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiol.230163 · Cited by 1,008 · see citing works
ChatGPT and the future of medical writing
Biswas, S. (2023) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiol.223312 · Cited by 571 · see citing works
Sarraju, A., Bruemmer, D., Iterson, E. H. V., Cho, L., Rodríguez, F., & Laffin, L. J. (2023) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2023.1044 · Cited by 455 · see citing works
ChatGPT is shaping the future of medical writing but still requires human judgment
Kitamura, F. C. (2023) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiol.230171 · Cited by 317 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Tolchin B. Are AI chatbots in healthcare ethical? -Their use must require informed consent and independent review. Medpage Today. 2023.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Yu, H. (2023) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1181712 · Cited by 409 · see citing works
“RV University in Bangalore, India, issued a strict ban that explicitly prohibits students from using Chat GPT to complete tasks, participate in exams, or laboratory tests (Yadava, 2023).”
BackgroundSalih, S., Husain, O., Hamdan, M., Abdelsalam, S., Elshafie, H., & Motwakel, A. (2025) · Results in Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.rineng.2024.103837 · Cited by 74 · see citing works
Cherrez-Ojeda, I., Gallardo-Bastidas, J. C., Robles-Velasco, K., Osorio, M. F., Velez Leon, E. M., Leon Velastegui, M., Pauletto, P., Aguilar-Díaz, F. C., Squassi, A., González Eras, S. P., et al. (2024) · JMIR Medical Education · doi:10.2196/51757 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
- Authors
- Yadava, O. P.
- Affiliations
- National Heart Institute (IN)
- Corresponding author
- Yadava, Om Prakash
- ORCID
- Yadava, Om Prakash
- Venue
- Indian Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
- Published
- 2023-03-28
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 217-221
- ISSN
- 0970-9134 (ISSN-L)
- 0973-7723
- PMC
- PMC10140247
- OpenAlex
- W4361205037
- Cited by
- 27
- References
- 6
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Indian Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Academic integrity and plagiarism
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Law, AI, and Intellectual Property
- Keywords
- ChatGPT, generative AI, academic plagiarism, AI-generated text, transfer learning, supervised learning, reinforcement learning, OpenAI
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
