Cited by 8Impact of Technology on AdolescentsBody Image and Dysmorphia StudiesEating Disorders and Behaviors

Cross-Sectional Study on the Association Between Social Media Use and Body Image Dissatisfaction Among Adolescents

Baminiwatta, Anuradha, Herath, Namal Chathuranga, Chandradasa, Miyuru·2021·Indian Journal of Pediatrics

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s12098-021-03662-3

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Baminiwatta, A., Herath, N. C., & Chandradasa, M.
Affiliations
  • University of Kelaniya (LK)
  • Wayamba University of Sri Lanka (LK)
Corresponding author
Baminiwatta, Anuradha
Venue
Indian Journal of Pediatrics
Published
2021-01-14
Volume
88
Issue
5
Pages
499-500
ISSN
  • 0019-5456 (ISSN-L)
  • 0973-7693
OpenAlex
W3118360751
Cited by
8
References
5
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2
FWCI
2.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Indian Journal of Pediatrics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Body Image and Dysmorphia Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
Keywords
social media use, body dissatisfaction, adolescents, body image, self-esteem
MeSH terms
Body Dissatisfaction, Adolescent, Feeding and Eating Disorders, Body Image, Cross-Sectional Studies, Humans, Social Media

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review