Assets and African Americans: Attempting to Capitalize on Hopes for Children Through College Savings Accounts
Abstract
Although some racial inequalities have lessened in the half-century since the passage of the first major civil rights legislation, the racial wealth gap remains and in recent years seems to be widening. Households with children are the least likely to be asset secure or have sufficient resources to enable investment in opportunities for mobility. Viewing inequality from this perspective indicates that what households are able to save and invest for the future might have a more lasting impact on the life chances of children than their current income and consumption. Summarizing data from the Saving for Education, Entrepreneurship, and Downpayment (SEED) Initiative, a quasi-experimental study that is part of a national demonstration of Child Development Accounts (CDAs) in the United States, this paper describes how African-American households engage with one important investment opportunity – college savings accounts for their pre-school children. Combining account monitoring, survey, interview and focus group data, we explore the reasons that many households chose not to open accounts or invest their own money. We offer suggestions for making asset development programs viable for low-income African-American families and their children.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In a Head Start intervention targeting low-income black and white parents to start a college education fund, only 62% of the black parents and 67% of the white parents enrolled in the program.
“However, only 62% of the black parents and 67% of the white parents enrolled in the program.”
From Reducing Racial Inequities in Health: Using What We Already Know to Take Action (2019) · cites this paper as [119]
An evaluation revealed that these parents had low levels of financial literacy, a history of negative experiences with financial institutions and more severe household financial constraints than was recognized by the designers of the intervention.
“An evaluation revealed that these parents had low levels of financial literacy, a history of negative experiences with financial institutions and more severe household financial constraints than was recognized by the designers of the intervention [119].”
From Reducing Racial Inequities in Health: Using What We Already Know to Take Action (2019) · cites this paper as [119]
Cites
The Framing of Decisions and the Psychology of Choice
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1981) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.7455683 · Cited by 17,604 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Finally, psychological barriers identified by behavioral economics, such as loss aversion and status-quo bias (Tversky and Kahneman 1981; Bertrand et al. 2006) can make it less likely for individuals to choose to participate in things that are complex or unfamiliar.”
Background
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Reducing Racial Inequities in Health: Using What We Already Know to Take Action
Williams, D. R., & Cooper, L. A. (2019) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph16040606 · Cited by 415 · see citing works
- Authors
- Shanks, T. R. W., Nicoll, K. L., & Johnson, T.
- Affiliations
- University of Michigan (US)
- University of Kansas (US)
- Corresponding author
- Shanks, Trina R. Williams
- Venue
- The Review of Black Political Economy
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2014-01
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 337-356
- ISSN
- 0034-6446 (ISSN-L)
- 1936-4814
- OpenAlex
- W2047273299
- Cited by
- 11
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 7.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Review of Black Political Economy (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Ford Foundation
- Charles Stewart Mott Foundation
- Charles and Helen Schwab Foundation
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Accounting › Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis
- Social Sciences › Education › Higher Education Research Studies
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Income, Poverty, and Inequality
- Keywords
- African American families, racial wealth gap, asset development, child development accounts, low-income households, intergenerational mobility, household savings, children's life chances, financial inclusion
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review