Cited by 12Intimate Partner and Family ViolenceSexual Assault and Victimization StudiesGender and Feminist Studies

Are the Paths to Victim-Blaming Paved with Hostile Sexism, Honor System Justification, and Fragile Masculinity? Evidence from Men in Turkey

Öztemür, Gizem, Toplu-Demirtaş, Ezgi·2024·Sexuality & Culture

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s12119-023-10109-8

Cites

68 of 68 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Öztemür, G., & Toplu-Demirtaş, E.
Affiliations
Middle East Technical University (TR)
Corresponding author
Öztemür, Gizem
Venue
Sexuality & Culture
Published
2023-06-24
Volume
28
Issue
1
Pages
168-186
ISSN
  • 1095-5143 (ISSN-L)
  • 1936-4822
OpenAlex
W4381856715
Cited by
10
References
68
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3
FWCI
2.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Sexuality & Culture (publishedVersion)
  • MEF University Institutional Repository (MEF University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender and Feminist Studies
Keywords
victim blaming, hostile sexism, honor system, intimate partner violence, male victims of violence, date rape, honor culture, mediation, help-seeking

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review