Why Do States Commission the Truth? Political Considerations in the Establishment of African Truth and Reconciliation Commissions
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Diffusion mechanisms predict the implementation of postconflict justice.
“Based on the extant literature, the instruments appear to be valid as scholars argue that diffusion mechanisms predict the implementation of postconflict justice (for example, Dancy and Poe 2006;Pion-Berlin 1994;Roper and Barria 2009;Sikkink 2011).”
From Conflict Recurrence and Postconflict Justice: Addressing Motivations and Opportunities for Sustainable Peace (2017) · cites this paper as Roper and Barria 2009
Cites
What to do about missing values in time series cross- section data
Honaker, J., & King, G. (2010) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2010.00447.x · Cited by 966 · see citing works
Trials and Errors: Principle and Pragmatism in Strategies of International Justice
Snyder, J., & Vinjamuri, L. (2004) · International Security · doi:10.1162/016228803773100066 · Cited by 644 · see citing works
Mamdani, M. (2002) · Diacritics · doi:10.1353/dia.2005.0005 · Cited by 288 · see citing works
Overcoming apartheid: can truth reconcile a divided nation?
Gibson *, J. L. (2004) · Politikon · doi:10.1080/0258934042000280698 · Cited by 244 · see citing works
Truth as Justice: Investigatory Commissions in Latin America
Popkin, M., & Roht-Arriaza, N. (1995) · Law & Social Inquiry · doi:10.1111/j.1747-4469.1995.tb00683.x · Cited by 136 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Loyle, C. E., & Appel, B. J. (2017) · International Studies Quarterly · doi:10.1093/isq/sqx045 · Cited by 78 · see citing works
- Authors
- Roper, S. D., & Barria, L. A.
- Affiliations
- Eastern Illinois University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Roper, Steven D.
- ORCID
- Roper, Steven D.
- Venue
- Human Rights Review
- Published
- 2009-03-07
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 373-391
- ISSN
- 1524-8879 (ISSN-L)
- 1874-6306
- OpenAlex
- W2149922229
- Cited by
- 20
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 4.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Human Rights Review (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › War, Law, and Justice
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Political Conflict and Governance
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Memory, violence, and history
- Keywords
- Truth and Reconciliation Commission, sub-Saharan Africa, transitional justice, democratization, authoritarian regimes, political repression
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
