CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 28Motivation and Self-Concept in SportsEducation, Achievement, and GiftednessInnovative Teaching and Learning Methods

The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

An evaluation of the integrative model for learning and motivation in the college classroom

Levesque-Bristol, Chantal, Richards, K. Andrew R., Zissimopoulos, Angelika, Wang, Cong, Yu, Shi·2022·Current Psychology
DOI 10.1007/s12144-020-00671-x
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s12144-020-00671-x

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 52

  1. Alessio, H. (2004). Student perceptions about and performance in problem-based learning. Journal of Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 4, 23–24.
  2. Axtell, C., Maitlis, S., & Yearta, S. K. (1997). Predicting immediate and longer-term transfer of training. Personnel Review, 26, 201–213. · DOI
  3. Benware, L. M., & Deci, E. L. (1984). Quality of learning with an active verses passive motivational set. American Educational Research Journal, 21, 755–765. · DOI
  4. Bettencourt, B. A., & Sheldon, K. (2001). Social roles as mechanisms for psychological need satisfaction within social groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 1131–1143. · DOI
  5. Billing, D. (2007). Teaching for transfer of core/key skills in higher education: Cognitive skills. Higher Education, 53, 483–516. · DOI
  6. Black, A. E., & Deci, E. L. (2000). The effects of instructors' autonomy support and students' autonomous motivation on learning organic chemistry: A self-determination theory perspective. Science Education, 84, 740–756. · DOI
  7. Brooks, D. C., Marsh, K., Wilcox, K., & Cohen, B. (2011). Beyond satisfaction: Toward an outcomes based, procedural model of faculty development program evaluation. Journal of Faculty Development, 25(3), 1–8.
  8. Brown, T. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. New York: Guilford Press.
  9. Byrne, B. M. (1998). Structural equation modeling with LISREL, PRELIS, and SIMPLIS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Mahwah: Lawerence Erlbaum.
  10. De George-Walker, L., & Keeffe, M. (2010). Aelf-determined blended learning: A case study of blended learning design. Higher Education Research and Development, 29, 1–13. · DOI
  11. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum. · DOI · Paper page
  12. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, T. D. (1991). A motivational appropach to the self: Integration in personality. In R. Dienstbier (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation (Vol. 38). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
  13. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2008). Self-determination theory: A macrotheory of human motivation, development, and health. Canadian Psychology, 49, 182–185. · DOI · Paper page
  14. Deci, E. L., Ryan, R. M., & Williams, G. C. (1996). Need satisfaction and the self-regulation of learning. Learning and Individual Differences, 8, 165–183s. · DOI
  15. Diamantopoulos, A., & Siguaw, J. A. (2000). Introducing LISREL: A guide for the uninitiated. Thousand Oaks: Sage. · DOI
  16. Everett, D. R. (2010). Factors that influence transfer of learning from the online environment. Information Systems Education Journal, 8(4), 3–13.
  17. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 39–50. · DOI · Paper page
  18. Grolnick, W. S., & Ryan, R. M. (1989). Parent styles associated with children’s self-regulation and competence in school. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 143–145. · DOI · Paper page
  19. Haskell, R. E. (2000). Transfer of learning: Cognition, instruction, and reasoning. San Diego: Academic Press.
  20. Hatcher, L. (1994). A step-by-step approach to using the SAS system for factor analysis and structural equation modeling. Cary: SAS Institute, Inc..
  21. Hooper, T. (2009). The impact on career direction of a tertiary management programme for mid-career ICT professionals. Higher Education Research and Development, 28, 509–522. · DOI
  22. Kasser, T., Davey, J., & Ryan, R. M. (1992). Motivation, dependability, and employee-supervisor discrepancies in psychiatric vocational rehabilitation settings. Rehabilitation Psychology, 37, 175–187.
  23. Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practices of structural equation modeling: Modeling in the social sciences (3rd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.
  24. Kyndt, E., Dochy, P., Struyven, K., & Cascallar, E. (2011). The direct and indirect effect of motivation for learning on students' approaches to learning through the perceptions of workload and task complexity. Higher Education Research and Development, 30, 135–150. · DOI
  25. Lambert, A. D., & Miller, A. L. (2014). Lower response rates on alumni surveys might not mean lower response representitiveness. Educational Research Quarterly, 37(3), 38–51.
  26. Levesque, C. S., Zuehlke, N., Stanek, L., & Ryan, R. M. (2004). Autonomy and competence in German and U.S. university students: A comparative study based on self-determination theory. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(68-84). · DOI
  27. Levesque-Bristol, C., Sell, G. R., & Zimmerman, J. A. (2006). A theory-based integrative model for learning and motivation in higher education. In S. Chadwick-Blossey & D. R. Robertson (Eds.), To improve the academy (Vol. 24, pp. 86–103). Boston: Anker.
  28. Levesque-Bristol, C., Knapp, T. D., & Fisher, B. J. (2010). The effectiveness of service-learning: It's not always what you think. The Journal of Experimental Education, 33, 208–224.
  29. Levesque-Bristol, C., Flierl, M., Zywicki, C., Parker, L. C., Connor, C., Guberman, D., Nelson, D., Maybee, C., Bonem, E., FitzSimmons, J., & Lott, E. (2019). Creating student-centered learning environments and changing teaching culture: Purdue University’s IMPACT program (occasional paper 38). Urbana: University of Illinois and Indiana University, National Institute for Learning Outcomes Assessment (NILOA).
  30. Martin, A. J., & Dowson, M. (2009). Interpersonal relationships, motivation, engagement, and achievement: Yields for theory, current issues, and educational practice. Review of Educational Research, 79, 327–365. · DOI
  31. National Research Council. (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
  32. Nokes-Malach, T. J., & Belenky, D. M. (2011). Incorporating motivation into a theoretical framework for knowledge transfer. In J. P. M. B. H. Ross (Ed.), Cognition in education (Vol. 55, pp. 109–135). San Diego: Academic Press.
  33. Ntoumanis, N. (2001). A self-determination approach to the understanding of motivation in physical education. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 71(2), 225–242. · DOI · Paper page
  34. Rhodes, J., Lok, P., Hung, R. Y., & Fang, S. C. (2006). An integrative model of organizational learning and social capital on effective knowledge transfer and perceived organizational performance. Journal of Workplace Learning, 20, 245–258. · DOI
  35. Richards, K. A. R., & Levesque-Bristol, C. (2014). Student learning and motivation in physical education. Strategies: A Journal for Physical and Sport Educators, 27(2), 43–46. · DOI
  36. Richards, K. A. R., & Levesque-Bristol, C. (2016). The influence of self-efficacy and self-regulated motivation on civic learning in service-learning courses. Journal of College Student Development, 57, 827–843. · DOI
  37. Richards, K. A. R., & Velasquez, J. D. (2014). First year millennial students’ perceptions of instruction in large lectures: The top ten mistakes their instructors make. Journal on Excellence in College Teaching, 25(2), 25–55.
  38. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2013). Toward a social psychology of assimilation: Self-determination theory in cognitive development and education. In B. W. Sokol, F. M. E. Grouzet, & U. Muller (Eds.), Self-regulation and autonomy: Social and developmental dimensions of human conduct (pp. 191–207). Cambirdge: Cambridge University Press. · DOI
  39. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2017). Self-determination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness. New York: The Guilford Press. · DOI · Paper page
  40. Satorra, A., & Bentler, P. M. (1994). Corrections to test statistics and standard errors in covariance structure analysis. In A. von Eye & C. C. Clogg (Eds.), Latent variable analysis: Applications for developmental research (pp. 399–419). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
  41. Schreiber, J. A., Stage, F. K., King, J., Nora, A., & Barlow, E. A. (2006). Reporting structural equation modeling and confirmatory factor analysis results: A review. The Journal of Educational Research, 99, 323–337. · DOI · Paper page
  42. Svinicki, M. D. (2004). Learning and motivation in the postsecondary classroom. Boston: Anker.
  43. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2013). Using multivariate statistics (6th ed.). Boston: Pearson.
  44. Talley, A., Kocum, L., Schlegel, R. J., Molix, L., & Bettencourt, B. A. (2012). Social roles, basic psychological needs, and psychological health: The central role of competence. Personality and Psychology Bulletin, 38(2), 155–173. · DOI
  45. Teo, T., Lee, C. B., Chai, C. S., & Wong, S. L. (2009). Assessing the intention to use technology among pre-service teachers in Singapore and Malaysia: A multigroup invariance analysis of the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). Computers & Education, 53, 1000–1009. · DOI
  46. Thomas, E. J. (2007). Thoughtful planning fosters learning transfer. [reports - descriptive]. Adult Learning, 18(3–4), 4–8. · DOI
  47. Vallerand, R. J. (1997). Toward a hierarchical model of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 29, pp. 271–360). San Diego: Academic Press.
  48. Van den Broeck, A., & Rosen, C. C. (2016). A review of self-determination theory basic psychological needs at work. Journal of Management, 42, 1195–1229. · DOI · Paper page
  49. Wang, Y., & Haggerty, N. (2009). Knowledge transfer in virtual settings: The role of individual virtual competency. Information Systems Journal, 19(6), 571–593. · DOI
  50. Wang, H. H., Chen, H. T., Lin, H. S., & Hong, Z. R. (2017). The effects of college students’ positive thinking, learning motivation, abd self-regulation through a self-reflection intervention in Taiwan. Higher Education Research and Development, 36, 201–216. · DOI
  51. Williams, G. C., & Deci, E. L. (1996). Internalization of biopsychosocial values by medical students: A test of self-determination theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 767–779. · DOI
  52. Yu, S. (2019). A cross-classified path analysis of the general self-determination theory model on situational, individual, and classroom levels. PhD Dissertation. Purdue University. · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 28

Metadata

Authors
Levesque-Bristol, C., Richards, K. A. R., Zissimopoulos, A., Wang, C., & Yu, S.
Affiliations
  • University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
  • University of Chicago (US)
  • Yale University (US)
  • Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen (CN)
Corresponding author
Richards, K. Andrew R.
ORCID
Venue
Current Psychology
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2020-03-04
Volume
41
Issue
3
Pages
1447-1459
ISSN
  • 1046-1310 (ISSN-L)
  • 1936-4733
DOI
10.1007/s12144-020-00671-x
OpenAlex
W3009920968
Cited by
28
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 1
FWCI
4.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
Locations
Current Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
Keywords
self-determination theory, student motivation, classroom climate, psychological need satisfaction, autonomous motivation, student-centered learning environment, autonomy, competence, relatedness, university students

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review