The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year; 66 of the 68 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 1 of the 13 sources its claims cite were checked for support.
An investigation into the relationship between climate change anxiety and mental health among Gen Z Filipinos
Open accessAbstract
This predictive cross-sectional study investigated the link between climate change anxiety and mental health among 433 Filipinos.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
7 Sources not found · 7 Own method · 5 Own result · 4 No full text of the sources · 4 Own interpretation · 1 Partly supported · 1 Not checked yet · accuracy not yet measured
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Hence, we accepted our hypothesis that higher climate change anxiety predicts significantly lower mental health among our Gen Z Filipino participants.”
§ An investigation into the relationship between climate change anxiety and mental health among Gen Z Filipinos > Results
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Rests on an assumption: The COVID-19 pandemic context did not substantially confound the observed relationship between climate change anxiety and mental health.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“With the value of r2 = .135 of the MHI-Index, our result indicated that 13.5% of the mental health index variance could be explained by an individual’s level of climate change anxiety.”
§ An investigation into the relationship between climate change anxiety and mental health among Gen Z Filipinos > Results
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“we also found that climate change anxiety has a significant positive correlation with the MHI-38 global scale of Psychological Distress (r = .39, p < .001), but no correlation with the MHI-38 global scale of Psychological Wellbeing (r = −.05, p = .140).”
§ An investigation into the relationship between climate change anxiety and mental health among Gen Z Filipinos > Results
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“we also found that climate change anxiety has a significant positive correlation with the MHI-38 global scale of Psychological Distress (r = .39, p < .001), but no correlation with the MHI-38 global scale of Psychological Wellbeing (r = −.05, p = .140).”
§ An investigation into the relationship between climate change anxiety and mental health among Gen Z Filipinos > Results
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“the correlational analysis showed that climate change anxiety and mental health are significantly negatively correlated at the .001 level (r = −.37, p < .001).”
§ An investigation into the relationship between climate change anxiety and mental health among Gen Z Filipinos > Results
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“When cleaning, scrubbing, and fixing activities are also done after experiencing a typhoon, the participants’ anxieties decrease (Baticula et al., 2014).”
§ An investigation into the relationship between climate change anxiety and mental health among Gen Z Filipinos > Discussion
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Baticula et al., 2014
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Not matched
In the paper
“Thus, it was found that more religious people are less susceptible to having mental health problems (Castillo & Alino, 2020).”
§ An investigation into the relationship between climate change anxiety and mental health among Gen Z Filipinos > Discussion
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Castillo & Alino, 2020 source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Effects of climate change awareness on wellbeing will not be adverse if individuals are aware of the possible actions to mitigate climate change (Chukwuorji et al., 2017).”
§ An investigation into the relationship between climate change anxiety and mental health among Gen Z Filipinos > Discussion
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Chukwuorji et al., 2017
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Not matched
In the paper
“Bollettino et al. (2020) conducted a study on Filipino perception of climate change and discovered that Filipinos have an overall low public awareness about climate change. Only 12% of the respondents were found to be well-informed about the worsening climate.”
§ An investigation into the relationship between climate change anxiety and mental health among Gen Z Filipinos > Discussion
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Bollettino et al. (2020) source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“This study’s findings align with Clayton’s (2020) suggestion that climate anxiety is not inherently indicative of a mental health problem.”
§ An investigation into the relationship between climate change anxiety and mental health among Gen Z Filipinos > Discussion
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Clayton’s (2020)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Instead, various other factors can moderate the likelihood that climate anxiety has a negative effect on mental health.”
§ An investigation into the relationship between climate change anxiety and mental health among Gen Z Filipinos > Discussion
plainconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Moreover, coping strategies of people to climate change anxiety may have reduced its impact on mental health.”
§ An investigation into the relationship between climate change anxiety and mental health among Gen Z Filipinos > Discussion
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Rests on an assumption: Filipino culture is collectivist.
In the paper
“Furthermore, the study of Ortega and Klauth (2017) of UNICEF confirmed that Filipino knowledge regarding climate change adaptation is not enough.”
§ An investigation into the relationship between climate change anxiety and mental health among Gen Z Filipinos > Discussion
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Ortega and Klauth (2017)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Not matched
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Further, Kelly (2017) concluded that those enrolled in environment classes reported higher stress and anxiety levels than those who are not, implying that awareness about the environment contributes to their distress and negative emotional states.”
§ An investigation into the relationship between climate change anxiety and mental health among Gen Z Filipinos > Discussion
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Kelly (2017)
Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Not checked yet
- It may state two separate claims as one. 5
- Probably not a substantial claim. 10
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“This statement is consistent with Talik's (2013) report, where it was found that religious coping is associated with better adjustment and does not indicate psychological distress.”
§ An investigation into the relationship between climate change anxiety and mental health among Gen Z Filipinos > Discussion
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites Talik's (2013) sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Introduction (page not provided) says positive religious coping is related to better functioning and correlates negatively with indicators of psychological distress. But it also says negative religious coping is associated with poorer adjustment and can be associated with greater distress. The claim omits this distinction and overgeneralizes to religious coping as a whole. (LLM, conf=0.88)
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Partly supported
In the paper
“Lastly, it was concluded that Filipinos also use mitigating measures which save lives, livelihood, and household assets they find significant.”
§ An investigation into the relationship between climate change anxiety and mental health among Gen Z Filipinos > Discussion
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Baticula et al., 2014
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“A total of 487 Gen Z Filipinos were gathered, after which data were reviewed, and incomplete responses were excluded (n = 54); the final 433 data were then scored and statistically analyzed using the IBM Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS).”
§ An investigation into the relationship between climate change anxiety and mental health among Gen Z Filipinos > Method > Procedure
plainn = 433- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Ethical approval for this study was granted by the UST College of Science Ethics Review Committee.”
§ An investigation into the relationship between climate change anxiety and mental health among Gen Z Filipinos > Method > Procedure
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“In the meta-analysis of Soh et al. (2020), digital cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia (CBT-I) has shown significant efficacy in treating insomnia.”
§ An investigation into the relationship between climate change anxiety and mental health among Gen Z Filipinos > Discussion
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Soh et al. (2020) source
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The results indicate a significant but weak negative relationship between climate change anxiety and mental health among the Gen Z Filipino participants”
§ An investigation into the relationship between climate change anxiety and mental health among Gen Z Filipinos > Discussion
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: The convenience sample of 433 online Gen Z Filipinos is representative of the broader Gen Z Filipino population.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Participants voluntarily completed the two scales in randomized order (MHI-CCAS or CCAS-MHI) to control possible systematic order effects.”
§ An investigation into the relationship between climate change anxiety and mental health among Gen Z Filipinos > Method > Procedure
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“With that said, Baticula et al. (2014) reported that Filipinos cope with the effects of environmental disasters using preventive measures, receiving social support, and turning to faith.”
§ An investigation into the relationship between climate change anxiety and mental health among Gen Z Filipinos > Discussion
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites Baticula et al. (2014)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The MHI-38 in the present study obtained the following Cronbach’s alphas: Psychological Wellbeing (.92), Psychological Distress (.87), MHI-Index (.78).”
§ An investigation into the relationship between climate change anxiety and mental health among Gen Z Filipinos > Method > Measures
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“All the participants completed the Climate Change Anxiety Scale (Clayton & Karazsia, 2020) and the Mental Health Inventory (Veit & Ware, 1983) after giving their informed consent.”
§ An investigation into the relationship between climate change anxiety and mental health among Gen Z Filipinos > Method > Participants
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In the present study, the overall CCAS score and the Cognitive-Emotional Impairment and Functional Impairment subscale scores obtained Cronbach’s alpha reliabilities of .90, .86, and .83.”
§ An investigation into the relationship between climate change anxiety and mental health among Gen Z Filipinos > Method > Measures
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“On a positive note, climate change anxiety allows people to adapt and prepare for future events.”
§ An investigation into the relationship between climate change anxiety and mental health among Gen Z Filipinos > Discussion
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Hence, Filipinos highly use religious coping as this generates growth and encourages feelings of significance amidst stressful situations (as cited in Baticula et al., 2014).”
§ An investigation into the relationship between climate change anxiety and mental health among Gen Z Filipinos > Discussion
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites as cited in Baticula et al., 2014
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The data was subjected further to regression analysis while controlling the variables: age, sex, and severe calamities experienced to determine whether climate change anxiety can predict mental health.”
§ An investigation into the relationship between climate change anxiety and mental health among Gen Z Filipinos > Results
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
In the paper
“Internet-based cognitive behavioral therapy has demonstrated effectiveness in treating people with psychiatric and mental health disorders and people with medical conditions.”
§ An investigation into the relationship between climate change anxiety and mental health among Gen Z Filipinos > Discussion
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites Zhang & Ho, 2017 source
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper relies on this without support.
The convenience sample of 433 online Gen Z Filipinos is representative of the broader Gen Z Filipino population.
“The convenience sampling technique was used to gather Gen Z Filipinos residing in the Philippines who voluntarily participated online with no remuneration.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The COVID-19 pandemic context did not substantially confound the observed relationship between climate change anxiety and mental health.
“It is important to note that this study was conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Filipino culture is collectivist.
“The Philippines is known to have a collectivist culture.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“All nine studies investigating symptoms of psychological distress found significant small-to-large (r = .17 to 0.70) positive associations [41, 43–45, 51, 54, 55, 68, 70].”
Citations
Cites
Rumination reconsidered: a psychometric analysis.
Treynor, W., Gonzalez, R., & Nolen-Hoeksema, S. (2003) · Cognitive Therapy and Research · doi:10.1023/a:1023910315561 · Cited by 3,808
The structure of psychological distress and well-being in general populations.
Veit, C. T., & Ware, J. E. (1983) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-006x.51.5.730 · Cited by 2,094
Climate anxiety: Psychological responses to climate change
Clayton, S. (2020) · Journal of Anxiety Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.janxdis.2020.102263 · Cited by 1,409 · cited 2×
“While anxiety is certainly not the only negative emotion people feel in response to environmental problems, Clayton (2020) suggests that anxiety is particularly significant for capturing the sense of worry and concern people have about climate change.”
BackgroundThe Impact of Climate Change on Mental Health: A Systematic Descriptive Review
Cianconi, P., Betrò, S., & Janiri, L. (2020) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00074 · Cited by 1,320
Development and validation of a measure of climate change anxiety
Clayton, S., & Karazsia, B. T. (2020) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2020.101434 · Cited by 1,196
Synthesis of clathrate cerium superhydride CeH9 at 80-100 GPa with atomic hydrogen sublattice
Salke, N. P., Esfahani, M. M. D., Zhang, Y., Kruglov, I. A., Zhou, J., Wang, Y., Greenberg, E., Prakapenka, V. B., Liu, J., Оганов, А. Р., et al. (2019) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-019-12326-y · Cited by 1,020
Anxiety and the Ecological Crisis: An Analysis of Eco-Anxiety and Climate Anxiety
Pihkala, P. (2020) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su12197836 · Cited by 978
Emotion regulation strategies in depressive and anxiety symptoms in youth: A meta-analytic review
Schäfer, J. Ö., Naumann, E., Holmes, E. A., Tuschen-Caffier, B., & Samson, A. C. (2017) · Journal of Youth and Adolescence · doi:10.1007/s10964-016-0585-0 · Cited by 941
Change in Level of Positive Mental Health as a Predictor of Future Risk of Mental Illness
Keyes, C. L. M., Dhingra, S. S., & Simoes, E. J. (2010) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.2010.192245 · Cited by 778
Climate change and mental health: risks, impacts and priority actions
Hayes, K., Blashki, G., Wiseman, J., Burke, S., & Reifels, L. (2018) · International Journal of Mental Health Systems · doi:10.1186/s13033-018-0210-6 · Cited by 746
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- American Psychological Association. (2018). Stress in America Generation Z. Retrieved March 16, 2020, from https://www.apa.org/news/press/releases/stress/2018/stress-gen-z.pdf.
- Belli, G. (2008). Nonexperimental quantitative research. Lapan, 1, 59–77.
- Chukwuorji, J. C., Iorfa, S. K., Nzeadibe, T. C., & Ifeagwazi, C. M. (2017). Role of climate change awareness and pro-environmental behaviour in subjective wellbeing. Nigerian Journal of Social Sciences, 13(1), 39-48.
- Routledge, C., & Vess, M. (2019). Chapter 13 - terror management theory: A theory of psychological wellbeing. Handbook of Terror Management Theory (1st ed.) Academic Press.
- Sapir, D. (2018). 2018 review of disaster events: Supplementary information. Center for Research on the Epidemiology of Disasters. Retrieved April 4, 2020, from https://www.cred.be/2018-review-disaster-events
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Ogunbode, C. A., Doran, R., Hanss, D., Ojala, M., Salmela-Aro, K., van den Broek, K. L., Bhullar, N., Aquino, S. D., Marot, T., Schermer, J. A., et al. (2022) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2022.101887 · Cited by 549
Self-citationLawrance, E. L., Thompson, R., Newberry Le Vay, J., Page, L., & Jennings, N. (2022) · International Review of Psychiatry · doi:10.1080/09540261.2022.2128725 · Cited by 500
Climate change anxiety and mental health: Environmental activism as buffer
Schwartz, S. E. O., Benoit, L., Clayton, S., Parnes, M. F., Swenson, L., & Lowe, S. R. (2023) · Current Psychology · doi:10.1007/s12144-022-02735-6 · Cited by 421
Climate anxiety: What predicts it and how is it related to climate action?
Whitmarsh, L., Player, L., Jiongco, A., James, M., Williams, M., Marks, E., & Kennedy-Williams, P. (2022) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2022.101866 · Cited by 401
Fear for the future: Eco-anxiety and health implications, a systematic review
Boluda-Verdú, I., Senent-Valero, M., Casas-Escolano, M., Matijasevich, A., & Pastor-Valero, M. (2022) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2022.101904 · Cited by 306
Metadata
- Authors
- Reyes, M. E. S., Carmen, B. P. B., Luminarias, M. E. P., Mangulabnan, S. A. N. B., & Ogunbode, C. A.
- Affiliations
- University of Santo Tomas (PH)
- University of Nottingham (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Reyes, Marc Eric S.
- Venue
- Current Psychology
- Published
- 2021-07-15
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 7448-7456
- ISSN
- 1046-1310 (ISSN-L)
- 1936-4733
- PMC
- PMC8280276
- OpenAlex
- W3177597289
- Cited by
- 178
- References
- 68
- Citations by year
- 2026: 21 · 2025: 38 · 2024: 57 · 2023: 38 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 2
- FWCI
- 41.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Current Psychology (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Repository@Nottingham (University of Nottingham) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Climate Change Communication and Perception
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › COVID-19 and Mental Health
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Climate Change and Health Impacts
- Keywords
- climate anxiety, mental health, Generation Z, psychological distress, psychological well-being, climate change impacts, Filipino youth
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-09-28, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-09-28 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
