Cited by 13Mobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsDigital Mental Health InterventionsCystic Fibrosis Research Advances

Is mHealth a useful therapy for improving physical or emotional health in adolescents with cystic fibrosis? A systematic review

Open access
Valero-Moreno, Selene, Lacomba-Trejo, Laura, Montoya-Castilla, Inmaculada, Pérez-Marín, Marian·2023·Current Psychology

Abstract

Cystic fibrosis (CF) is a rare disease that severely compromises health and interferes with the lives of those who suffer from it and is especially challenging in adolescence. The use of tools such as MHealth may benefit the physical and psychological health of adolescents with CF. Therefore, this study aims to examine the benefits of MHealth in adolescents with CF through a systematic review. A search of the scientific literature following the PRISMA guidelines was conducted in the ProQuest Central, PubMed, Web Of Science, Embase and ínDICE databases, resulting in 186 studies, of which seven were selected (based on inclusion and exclusion criteria). Two blinded evaluators conducted the searches, the selection and data extraction process and the quality evaluation of the studies. The agreement between evaluators was excellent in all cases (Kappa ranged from .78 to .96). 214 pediatric CF patients (61.71% female) participated in the final analysis. The mean age was 12.76 years. The studies evaluated different types of mHealth tools, with greater homogeneity in the independent and dependent variables. The quality of the studies analyzed was poor, since these had small samples selected for convenience, conducted non-experimental and low-quality designs, recorded few variables, and their statistical analyses were not sufficiently robust. Further research is needed in this field, improving research designs and considering physical and psychological adjustment variables, as well as patients and family members in the process of health improvement.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s12144-021-02452-6

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A 2021 systematic review investigating mHealth apps for CF emotional and physical health concluded that current available research was of low quality due to small sample sizes, limited to pilot studies, and homogeneity in data.

    “a systematic review in 2021 investigating mHealth apps for CF emotional and physical health concluded that current available research was of low quality due to small sample sizes, limited to pilot studies, and with homogeneity in data (28).”

    From Virtual monitoring in CF – the importance of continuous monitoring in a multi-organ chronic condition (2023) · cites this paper as [28]

    The Abstract and Results > Quality Assessment describe the included studies as generally poor quality, with small convenience samples and weak designs. The paper does not characterize the research as limited to pilot studies. It also attributes difficulty combining the data to heterogeneity of measures and results, not homogeneity (Discussion; Methods > Bibliography Search). (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Covidence. (2021). Covidence systematic review software. http://www.covidence.org. Accessed 7 Feb 2020
  2. Vilarinho T Floch J Stav E Bernhaupt R Dalvi G Joshi A Balkrishan DK O’Neill J Winckler M Co-designing a mHealth application for self-management of cystic fibrosis BT - human-computer interaction – INTERACT 2017 2017 Springer International Publishing 3 22

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Valero-Moreno, S., Lacomba-Trejo, L., Montoya-Castilla, I., & Pérez-Marín, M.
Venue
Current Psychology
Published
2021-11-24
Volume
42
Issue
22
Pages
19302-19315
ISSN
  • 1046-1310 (ISSN-L)
  • 1936-4733
OpenAlex
W3215152408
Cited by
13
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2
FWCI
0.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Current Psychology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Repository of Digital Objects for Teaching Research and Culture (University of Valencia) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Funders
Universitat de Valencia
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Cystic Fibrosis Research Advances
Keywords
mobile health, cystic fibrosis, adolescents, physical health, emotional well-being, psychological adjustment, mobile health intervention, pediatric patients

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review