Cited by 408Cognitive Functions and MemoryHistorical and Modern Theater StudiesNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

Executive Functioning: Overview, Assessment, and Research Issues for Non-Neuropsychologists

Suchy, Yana·2009·Annals of Behavioral Medicine

Abstract

Background Executive functioning (EF) is a multifaceted neuropsychological construct that can be defined as (1) forming, (2) maintaining, and (3) shifting mental sets, corresponding to the abilities to (1) reason and generate goals and plans, (2) maintain focus and motivation to follow through with goals and plans, and (3) flexibly alter goals and plans in response to changing contingencies. Purpose Research involving EF has become increasingly popular in a number of disciplines including behavioral medicine and personality research. Methods The present article outlines some of the challenges faced by EF researchers, as well as briefly reviews historical perspective and neuroanatomical underpinnings of EF to provide broader context. Results Clinical presentations of EF deficits, definitions and operationalization of the construct, as well as selection of appropriate assessment methods are provided. Conclusion The article concludes with general cautions and guidelines for researchers.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s12160-009-9097-4

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Executive functions are mental processes, mainly initiated from the prefrontal cortex, that allow humans to engage in purposeful, goal-directed, and future-oriented behavior.

    “scholars concur that they are mental processes, mainly initiated from the prefrontal cortex of the brain, that allow humans to “engage in purposeful, goal‐directed, and future‐oriented behavior” (Suchy 2009, 109).”
  • Executive functions affect people's ability to plan activities ahead of time, act on those plans, and stay on task despite impulses and temptations.

    “Executive functions affect people's ability to plan activities ahead of time, act on those plans, and stay on task despite impulses and temptations to do something else when things get frustrating (Diamond 2013; Suchy 2009).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Suchy, Y.
Affiliations
University of Utah (US)
Corresponding author
Suchy, Yana
Venue
Annals of Behavioral Medicine
Published
2009-04
Volume
37
Issue
2
Pages
106-116
ISSN
  • 0742-5554 (ISSN-L)
  • 0883-6612
  • 1532-4796
OpenAlex
W1981603681
Cited by
408
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 63 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 21
FWCI
2.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Annals of Behavioral Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Historical and Modern Theater Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
executive function, executive function assessment, mental set shifting, goal setting and planning, executive dysfunction, behavioral medicine, personality research
MeSH terms
Behavioral Medicine, Cerebral Cortex, Cognition, Humans, Neuropsychological Tests, Problem Solving, Set, Psychology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review