Cited by 74Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesBehavioral Health and InterventionsCognitive Functions and Memory

Executive Functioning and Health: Introduction to the Special Series

Williams, Paula G., Thayer, Julian F.·2009·Annals of Behavioral Medicine

Abstract

Advances in the fields of neuropsychology and neuroscience have fueled a renewed interest in the association between brain functioning and health. This burgeoning activity is clearly due in part to the development and refinement of cognitive assessment techniques and brain imaging technology. Of particular relevance to health psychology and behavioral medicine has been recent research on the set of brain functions collectively termed “executive” (alternately termed executive functioning, executive cognitive functioning, or executive functions). This issue of Annals of Behavioral Medicine presents a series of papers that illustrate how research on central topics in health psychology and behavioral medicine may be informed by considering the role of executive functioning (EF), including maintenance and change of health behavior, stress regulation, developmental trajectories of aging and mortality, and management of chronic illness. As described by Suchy [1], EF is a multifaceted construct that includes the constellation of higher order cognitive processes that involve reasoning and problem solving, as well as planning, organization, and successful execution of behavior. Importantly, a variety of psychological constructs/processes rely on EF, including self-regulation, self-control, emotion regulation, delay of gratification, attentional control, and self-monitoring. Suchy [1] provides a useful framework for considering the varying definitions of EF, the neurocognitive substrates underlying the subcomponents of EF, and the advantages and limitations of various methods of assessment. EF is assessed with both traditional neuropsychological tests (e.g., Wisconsin Card Sorting Task) [2] and with experimental cognitive tasks (see [3–5]). As Suchy [1] outlines, each of these tasks assesses particular aspects of EF; there is no global test of EF. For this reason, behavioral medicine researchers and practitioners who incorporate measures of EF in their research or practice should be cognizant of which aspects of EF they are capturing and the limitations of their assessment methods.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s12160-009-9091-x

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The lack of parallel skin conductance findings may reflect parasympathetic regulation of heart rate but not skin conductance, and mindfulness may be especially relevant to concordance involving parasympathetic regulation.

    “This may be attributable to the role of the parasympathetic nervous system in regulating HR but not SC (Diamond & Otter-Henderson, 2007) and it is possible the construct of mindfulness is particularly salient to concordance between subjective distress and physiological reactivity in which there is parasympathetic regulation (Brosschot, Verkuil & Thayer, 2010; Williams & Thayer, 2009).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Williams, P. G., & Thayer, J. F.
Affiliations
  • University of Utah (US)
  • The Ohio State University (US)
Corresponding author
Williams, Paula G.
Venue
Annals of Behavioral Medicine
Published
2009-04
Volume
37
Issue
2
Pages
101-105
ISSN
  • 0742-5554 (ISSN-L)
  • 0883-6612
  • 1532-4796
OpenAlex
W1998633469
Cited by
74
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 4
FWCI
2.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Annals of Behavioral Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
Keywords
executive function, health behavior change, stress regulation, aging, mortality, chronic disease management, self-regulation, self-control, emotion regulation, delay of gratification, attentional control, self-monitoring, neuropsychological assessment, cognitive assessment, neuroimaging
MeSH terms
Behavioral Medicine, Cerebral Cortex, Cognition, Health Status, Humans, Neuropsychology, Problem Solving, Health Behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review