The DOI matches its Crossref record; 164 of the 165 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Review and Meta-Analysis of Affective Judgments and Physical Activity in Adult Populations
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Popular theories of health behavior have often been criticized for neglecting an affective component to behavioral engagement. PURPOSE: This study reviewed affective judgment (AJ) constructs employed in physical activity research to assess the relationship with behavior. Studies were eligible if they included: (a) a measure of physical activity; (b) a distinct measure of AJ (e.g., affective attitude, enjoyment, intrinsic motivation); and (c) involved participants with a mean age of 18 years or older. METHODS: Literature searches were concluded in September, 2009 among five key search engines. This search yielded a total of 10,631 potentially relevant records; of these, 102 passed the eligibility criteria. Random effects meta-analysis procedures with correction for sampling and measurement bias were employed in the analysis. RESULTS: Articles were published between 1989 and 2009, with sample sizes ranging from 15 to 6,739. Of the studies included, 82 were correlational and 20 were experimental, yielding 114 independent samples. The majority of the correlational samples reported a significant positive correlation between AJ and physical activity (83 out of 85), with a summary r of 0.42 (95% CI 0.37 to 0.46) that was invariant across the measures employed, study quality, population sampled and cultural variables. Experimental studies demonstrated that persuasive, information-based, and self-regulatory interventions failed to change AJ; by contrast, environmental and experiential interventions showed promise in their capability to influence AJ. CONCLUSIONS: The results point to a medium-effect size relationship between AJ and physical activity. Interventions that change AJ are scarce despite their potential for changing physical activity. Future experimental work designed to evaluate the causal impact ofAJ on physical activity is required.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Meta-analyses have pointed to similar-sized correlations with behaviour for intention (0.47 [10]), control (0.37 [10]), and affect (0.42 [60]), and so habit may be as important a proximal determinant of action as these constructs.”
From A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Applications of the Self-Report Habit Index to Nutrition and Physical Activity Behaviours (2011) · cites this paper as [60]
Citations
Cites
The theory of planned behavior
Ajzen, I. (1991) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-t · Cited by 90,587
Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses
Higgins, J. P. T., Thompson, S. G., Deeks, J. J., & Altman, D. G. (2003) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557 · Cited by 63,139
Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change
Bandura, A. (1977) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.84.2.191 · Cited by 43,925
Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985) · doi:10.1007/978-1-4899-2271-7 · Cited by 26,772
Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions: Cochrane Book Series
(2008) · doi:10.1002/9780470712184 · Cited by 25,048
Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences
Cohen, P., Cohen, P., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. (2014) · Psychology Press eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781410606266 · Cited by 20,852
Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior
Miller, K. A. J., Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1988) · Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews · doi:10.2307/2070638 · Cited by 15,403
Cohen, J. (1992) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037//0033-2909.112.1.155 · Cited by 8,771
Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations
(2004) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.328.7454.1490 · Cited by 8,477
Downs, S. H., & Black, N. (1998) · Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health · doi:10.1136/jech.52.6.377 · Cited by 8,252
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Hillsdon M, Foster C, Naidoo B, Crombie H. The effectiveness of public health interventions for increasing physical activity among adults: a review of reviews. UK: Health Development Agency; 2004.
- Wankel LM. The importance of enjoyment to adherence and psychological benefits from physical activity. Int J Sport Psychol. 1993; 24: 151–169.
- Spence JC, Burgess JA, Cutumisu N, et al. Self-efficacy and physical activity: A quantitative review. J Sport Exerc Psychol. 2006; 28: S172.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Health benefits of physical activity: a systematic review of current systematic reviews
Warburton, D. E. R., & Bredin, S. S. D. (2017) · Current Opinion in Cardiology · doi:10.1097/hco.0000000000000437 · Cited by 2,410
Rhodes, R. E., & Kates, A. (2015) · Annals of Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1007/s12160-015-9704-5 · Cited by 847
Self-citationGardner, B., de Bruijn, G.-J., & Lally, P. (2011) · Annals of Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1007/s12160-011-9282-0 · Cited by 574
Parental correlates in child and adolescent physical activity: a meta-analysis
Yao, C. A., & Rhodes, R. E. (2015) · International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity · doi:10.1186/s12966-015-0163-y · Cited by 540
“The eligibility criteria and search strategy followed a protocol used in previously published metaanalyses and reviews [25,26].”
MethodSelf-citationSocial cognitive theory and physical activity: a systematic review and meta‐analysis
Young, M. D., Plotnikoff, R. C., Collins, C. E., Callister, R., & Morgan, P. J. (2014) · Obesity Reviews · doi:10.1111/obr.12225 · Cited by 505
Metadata
- Authors
- Rhodes, R. E., Fiala, B., & Conner, M.
- Affiliations
- University of Victoria (CA)
- University of Leeds (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Rhodes, Ryan E.
- Fiala, Bonnie
- Conner, Mark
- Venue
- Annals of Behavioral Medicine
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2009-12
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 180-204
- ISSN
- 0742-5554 (ISSN-L)
- 0883-6612
- 1532-4796
- OpenAlex
- W1974130180
- Cited by
- 429
- References
- 165
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 32 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 34 · 2020: 72 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 27 · 2017: 28 · 2016: 32 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 23 · 2012: 15
- FWCI
- 1.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Annals of Behavioral Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Physical Activity and Health
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
- Keywords
- affective judgment, physical activity, affective attitudes, enjoyment, intrinsic motivation, health behavior, persuasive interventions, environmental interventions, experiential interventions, adults
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Affect, Humans, Judgment, Motivation, Motor Activity
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review