Cited by 67Behavioral Health and InterventionsObesity, Physical Activity, DietObesity and Health Practices

A Theoretically Grounded Systematic Review of Material Incentives for Weight Loss: Implications for Interventions

Burns, Rachel J., Donovan, Angela S., Ackermann, Ronald T., Finch, Emily A., Rothman, Alexander J., Jeffery, Robert W.·2012·Annals of Behavioral Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Providing material incentives for weight loss is a class of intervention strategies that has received considerable attention; however, the effectiveness of this class of strategies is uncertain. Attending to distinctions among incentive strategies may clarify our understanding of prior work and inform the design of future interventions. PURPOSE: A theoretical framework is proposed that distinguishes between four classes of incentive strategies and is used to organize randomized controlled trials of material incentives for weight loss. METHODS: A systematic literature review was conducted. RESULTS: Findings were mixed with regards to the overall efficacy of material incentives for weight loss. Three of the four proposed incentive categories are represented in the literature. Heterogeneous methods were used across studies rendering comparisons between studies difficult. CONCLUSIONS: Definitive conclusions about the usefulness of material incentives for weight loss could not be drawn. A theoretically grounded approach to designing and testing incentive strategies is encouraged.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s12160-012-9403-4

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Few health or other behavioral interventions have adapted interval reward schedules to facilitate habit formation.

    “Unfortunately, few health or other behavioral interventions have adapted interval reward schedules to facilitate habit formation (Burns et al. 2012).”

    From Psychology of Habit. (2016) · cites this paper as Burns et al. 2012

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Burns, R. J., Donovan, A. S., Ackermann, R. T., Finch, E. A., Rothman, A. J., & Jeffery, R. W.
Affiliations
  • University of Minnesota (US)
  • Indiana University Indianapolis (US)
  • Northwestern University (US)
Venue
Annals of Behavioral Medicine
Published
2012-08-21
Volume
44
Issue
3
Pages
375-388
ISSN
  • 0742-5554 (ISSN-L)
  • 0883-6612
  • 1532-4796
OpenAlex
W2059235001
Cited by
67
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 5
FWCI
1.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Annals of Behavioral Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Obesity and Health Practices
Keywords
material incentives, weight loss, incentive measures, theoretical framework, obesity intervention, intervention design, randomized controlled trials
MeSH terms
Humans, Motivation, Weight Loss, Exercise

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review