The role of exercise interval training in treating cardiovascular disease risk factors
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
HIIT is an effective and time-efficient exercise option for improving cardiometabolic health.
“HIIT has recently been touted as an effective and time-efficient exercise option for improving cardiometabolic health [18, 37].”
From High-Intensity Interval Training as an Efficacious Alternative to Moderate-Intensity Continuous Training for Adults with Prediabetes (2015) · cites this paper as [37]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 39 · Cited by 16
- Authors
- Earnest, C.
- Affiliations
- Pennington Biomedical Research Center (US)
- Corresponding author
- Earnest, Conrad
- ORCID
- Earnest, Conrad
- Venue
- Current Cardiovascular Risk Reports
- Published
- 2009-07
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 296-301
- ISSN
- 1932-9520 (ISSN-L)
- 1932-9563
- OpenAlex
- W2047694551
- Cited by
- 16
- References
- 39
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 5 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 3.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Current Cardiovascular Risk Reports (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Effects of Exercise
- Keywords
- interval training, cardiovascular risk factors, exercise intensity, aerobic exercise, anaerobic metabolism, cardiorespiratory fitness, peripheral arterial disease, intermittent claudication, coronary artery disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, type 2 diabetes, older adults, exercise recommendations
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
