The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A review of CO2 storage in geological formations emphasizing modeling, monitoring and capacity estimation approaches
Open accessAbstract
The merits of CO2 capture and storage to the environmental stability of our world should not be underestimated as emissions of greenhouse gases cause serious problems. It represents the only technology that might rid our atmosphere of the main anthropogenic gas while allowing for the continuous use of the fossil fuels which still power today’s world. Underground storage of CO2 involves the injection of CO2 into suitable geological formations and the monitoring of the injected plume over time, to ensure containment. Over the last two or three decades, attention has been paid to technology developments of carbon capture and sequestration. Therefore, it is high time to look at the research done so far. In this regard, a high-level review article is required to provide an overview of the status of carbon capture and sequestration research. This article presents a review of CO2 storage technologies which includes a background of essential concepts in storage, the physical processes involved, modeling procedures and simulators used, capacity estimation, measuring monitoring and verification techniques, risks and challenges involved and field-/pilot-scale projects. It is expected that the present review paper will help the researchers to gain a quick knowledge of CO2 sequestration for future research in this field.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Parkhurst, D. L., & Appelo, C. A. J. (2013) · Techniques and Methods · doi:10.3133/tm6a43 · Cited by 3,779
Carbon capture and storage: how green can black be
Haszeldine, R. S. (2009) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1172246 · Cited by 2,021
Lal, R. (2008) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2007.2185 · Cited by 1,413
Kim, S., & Hosseini, S. A. (2014) · Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/ghg.1388 · Cited by 69
Cited by
Underground hydrogen storage: a comprehensive review
Zivar, D., Kumar, S., & Foroozesh, J. (2021) · International Journal of Hydrogen Energy · doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.08.138 · Cited by 1,287
Progress in carbon capture technologies
Wilberforce, T., Olabi, A. G., Sayed, E. T., Elsaid, K., & Abdelkareem, M. A. (2021) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.143203 · Cited by 710
CO2 enhanced gas recovery and sequestration in depleted gas reservoirs: A review
Hamza, A., Hussein, I. A., Al-Marri, M. J., Mahmoud, M., Shawabkeh, R., & Aparicio, S. (2021) · Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.petrol.2020.107685 · Cited by 357
Metadata
- Authors
- Ajayi, T., Gomes, J. S., & Bera, A.
- Venue
- Petroleum Science
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-07-08
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1028-1063
- ISSN
- 1995-8226 (ISSN-L)
- 1672-5107
- OpenAlex
- W2958702840
- Cited by
- 684
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 15.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A review of CO2 storage in geological formations emphasizing modeling, monitoring and capacity estimation approaches. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s12182-019-0340-8
- The paper
- Ajayi, T., Gomes, J. S., & Bera, A. (2019). A review of CO2 storage in geological formations emphasizing modeling, monitoring and capacity estimation approaches. Petroleum Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12182-019-0340-8
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.