Cited by 266Income, Poverty, and InequalityPoverty, Education, and Child WelfareAdolescent Health and Behaviors

A new version of the HBSC Family Affluence Scale–FAS III: Scottish qualitative findings from the International FAS Development Study

Open access
Hartley, Jane E. K., Levin, Kate, Currie, Candace·2016·Child Indicators Research

Abstract

A critical review of the Family Affluence Scale (FAS) concluded that FAS II was no longer discriminatory within very rich or very poor countries, where a very high or a very low proportion of children were categorised as high FAS or low FAS respectively (Currie et al. 2008). The review concluded that a new version of FAS - FAS III - should be developed to take into account current trends in family consumption patterns across the European region, the US and Canada. In 2012, the FAS Development and Validation Study was conducted in eight countries - Denmark, Greenland, Italy, Norway, Poland, Romania, Slovakia and Scotland. This paper describes the Scottish qualitative findings from this study. The Scottish qualitative fieldwork comprising cognitive interviews and focus groups sampled from 11, 13 and 15 year-old participants from 18 of the most- and least- economically deprived schools. These qualitative results were used to inform the final FAS III recommendations.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s12187-015-9325-3

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • We used the six-item Family Affluence Scale-III, which assesses common material assets or activities, to estimate the relative socioeconomic position of respondents in society.

    “We used the six-item Family Affluence Scale-III,33 which assesses common material assets or activities, to estimate the relative socioeconomic position of respondents in society (appendix p 5).”

    From Psychological responses, mental health, and sense of agency for the dual challenges of climate change and the COVID-19 pandemic in young people in the UK: an online survey study (2022) · cites this paper as [33]

    The Introduction describes FAS as a measure of material resources, consumption and purchasing power, and the FAS III Development and Validation Study section says the revised scale was intended to compare relative inequalities between groups of children. The paper therefore supports using FAS III as a proxy for socioeconomic position, but the passages found do not establish that the version used was a six-item scale. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 18

  1. Anonymised for review (2013). FAS III Development Study Report, Report accessed on www.CAHRU.org.
  2. Bradshaw J Hoelscher P Richardson D An index of child well-being in the European union Social Indicators Research 2009 80 1 133 177 10.1007/s11205-006-9024-z · DOI
  3. Currie CE Elton RA Todd J Platt S Indicators of socio-economic status for adolescents: the WHO Health Behaviour in School-Aged Children Survey Health Education Research 1997 12 3 385 397 10.1093/her/12.3.385 10174221 · DOI
  4. Currie C Molcho M Boyce W Holstein BE Torsheim T Richter M Researching health inequalities in adolescents: the development of the Health Behaviour in School-aged Children (HBSC) Family Affluence Scale Social Science & Medicine 2008 66 6 1429 1436 10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.11.024 18179852 · DOI
  5. Elgar FJ De Clercq B Schnohr CW Bird P Pickett KE Torsheim T Hofmann F Currie C Absolute and relative family affluence and psychosomatic symptoms in adolescents Social Science and Medicine 2013 91 25 31 10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.04.030 23849235 · DOI
  6. Jakab Z Marmot M Social determinants of health in Europe The Lancet Online 2012 379 9811 103 105 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61511-0 22014679 · DOI
  7. Koivusilta LK Rimpela AH Kautiainen SM Health inequality in adolescence. Does stratification occur by familial social background, family affluence, or personal social position? BMC Public Health 2006 6 1 110 10.1186/1471-2458-6-110 16643660 PMC1479325 · DOI
  8. Levin KA Torsheim T Vollebergh W Richter M Davies CA Schnohr CW Currie C National income and income inequality, family affluence and life satisfaction among 13 year old boys and girls: a multilevel study in 35 countries Social Indicators Research 2011 104 2 179 194 10.1007/s11205-010-9747-8 21980216 PMC3183268 · DOI
  9. Levin KA Dallago L Currie C The association between adolescent life satisfaction, family structure, family affluence and gender differences in parent–child communication Social Indicators Research 2012 106 2 287 305 10.1007/s11205-011-9804-y · DOI
  10. Liu Y Wang M Villberg J Torsheim T Tynjälä J Lv Y Kannas L Reliability and validity of Family Affluence Scale (FAS II) among adolescents in Beijing, China Child Indicators Research 2012 5 2 235 251 10.1007/s12187-011-9131-5 · DOI
  11. Park HY Heo J Subramanian SV Kawachi I Oh J Socioeconomic inequalities in adolescent depression in South Korea: a multilevel analysis PLoS One 2012 7 10 e47025 10.1371/journal.pone.0047025 23077540 PMC3471941 · DOI
  12. Pickett W Molcho M Elgar FJ Brooks F De Looze M Rathmann K Bogt TMT Gabhainn SN Sigmundovà D De Matos MG Craig W Walsh SD Harel-Fisch Y Currie C Trends and socioeconomic correlates of adolescent physical fighting in 30 countries Pediatrics 2013 131 1 e18 e26 10.1542/peds.2012-1614 23209107 · DOI
  13. Sleskova M Salonna F Madarasova Geckova A Nagyova I Stewart RE Van Dijk JP Does parental unemployment affect adolescents’ health? Journal of Adolescent Health 2006 38 527 535 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2005.03.021 16635763 · DOI
  14. ter Bogt TFM de Looze M Molcho M Godeau E Hublet A Kokkevi A Kuntsche E Nic Gabhainn S Franelic IP Simons-Morton B Sznitman S Vieno A Vollebergh W Pickett W Do societal wealth, family affluence and gender account for trends in adolescent cannabis use? A 30 country cross-national study Addiction 2014 109 2 273 283 10.1111/add.12373 24261614 PMC3947129 · DOI
  15. Von Rueden U Gosch A Rajmil L Bissegger C Ravens-Sieberer U Group, t.E.K Socioeconomic determinants of health related quality of life in childhood and adolescence: results from a European study Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 2006 60 2 130 135 10.1136/jech.2005.039792 16415261 PMC2566139 · DOI
  16. West P Sweeting H Speed E We really do know what you do: a comparison of reports from 11 year olds and their parents in respect of parental economic status and occupation Sociology 2001 35 2 539 559 10.1177/S0038038501000268 · DOI
  17. WHO Review of social determinants and the health divide in the WHO European Region: final report 2013 Copenhagen WHO Regional Office for Europe
  18. Williams JM Currie CE Wright P Elton RA Beattie TF Socioeconomic status and adolescent injuries Social Science & Medicine 1997 44 12 1881 1891 10.1016/S0277-9536(96)00297-3 9194249 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hartley, J. E. K., Levin, K., & Currie, C.
Affiliations
  • Scottish Collaboration for Public Health Research and Policy (GB)
  • NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde (GB)
  • University of St Andrews (GB)
Corresponding author
Hartley, Jane E. K.
Venue
Child Indicators Research
Published
2015-08-02
Volume
9
Issue
1
Pages
233-245
ISSN
  • 1874-897X (ISSN-L)
  • 1874-8988
OpenAlex
W1878724724
Cited by
266
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 31 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 39 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 34 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 6
FWCI
41.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Child Indicators Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Edinburgh Research Explorer (University of Edinburgh) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • St Andrews Research Repository (St Andrews Research Repository) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • ResearchOnline (Glasgow Caledonian University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Medical Research Council (MR/K023209/1)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Income, Poverty, and Inequality
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Poverty, Education, and Child Welfare
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Adolescent Health and Behaviors
Keywords
Family Affluence Scale, family affluence, household consumption, economic hardship, cognitive interviewing, focus groups, scale development, Scotland

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review