Cited by 16Radiation Dose and ImagingAdvanced Radiotherapy TechniquesDigital Radiography and Breast Imaging

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Considerations on the practical application of the size-specific dose estimation (SSDE) method of AAPM Report 204

Abstract

Computed tomography (CT) is responsible for much of the radiation exposure to the population for medical purposes. The technique requires high doses that vary widely from center to center, and for different scanners and radiologists as well. In order to monitor doses to patients, the American Association of Physicists in Medicine has developed the size-specific dose estimate (SSDE), which consists of the determination of patient size dependent coefficients for converting the standard dosimetric index, CTDIvol, into an estimate of the dose actually absorbed by the patient. The present work deals with issues concerning the use of SSDE in the clinical practice. First the issue regarding how much SSDE varies when, for a given CT protocol, the scan covers slightly different volumes is addressed. Then, the differences among SSDE values derived from different patient size descriptors are investigated. For these purposes, data from a clinical archive are analyzed by an automatic procedure specifically developed for SSDE.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s12194-014-0265-2

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 16

Metadata

Authors
Noferini, L., Fulcheri, C., Taddeucci, A., Bartolini, M., & Gori, C.
Affiliations
  • University of Florence (IT)
  • Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi (IT)
Corresponding author
Noferini, Linhsia
Venue
Radiological Physics and Technology
Published
2014-04-16
Volume
7
Issue
2
Pages
296-302
ISSN
  • 1865-0333 (ISSN-L)
  • 1865-0341
OpenAlex
W2029638159
Cited by
16
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1
FWCI
1.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Radiological Physics and Technology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • American Association of Physicists in Medicine
  • Università degli Studi di Firenze
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Radiation Dose and Imaging
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Radiation › Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Digital Radiography and Breast Imaging
Keywords
size-specific dose estimate, computed tomography, patient radiation dose, CTDIvol
MeSH terms
Humans, Models, Anatomic, Radiography, Abdominal, Radiometry, Societies, Scientific, Radiography, Thoracic, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Body Size, Precision Medicine, Research Report

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review