Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 9

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

Ensuring Product Safety: A Comprehensive Retrospective Study of USFDA Drug Recalls (2019–2023)

Nizam VP, Muhammad, Yerram, Sravani, Patnam, Jayasri Devi, CS, Ajmal, Aglave, Gayatri, Joga, Ramesh, Raghuvanshi, Rajeev Singh, Srivastava, Saurabh·2024·Journal of Pharmaceutical Innovation

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s12247-024-09869-z

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

Cited by 9

Research works printed but not linked: 12

  1. Dey M, et al. Recalls of foods due to microbiological contamination classified by the US Food and Drug Administration, fiscal years 2003 through 2011. J Food Prot. 2013;76(6):932–8. · doi:10.4315/0362-028x.jfp-12-464
  2. Sharma GM, Ma Y, Luccioli S. Recalls associated with food allergens and gluten in FDA-regulated foods from fiscal years 2013 to 2019. J Food Prot. 2023;86(4):100069. · doi:10.1016/j.jfp.2023.100069
  3. Blickem ER et al. An Analysis of Seafood Recalls in the United through 2022. J Food Prot, 2023: p. 100090. · doi:10.1016/j.jfp.2023.100090
  4. Bliznakov Z, Mitalas G, Pallikarakis N. Analysis and classification of medical device recalls. in World Congress on Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering 2006: August 27–September 1, 2006 COEX Seoul, Korea Imaging the Future Medicine. 2007. Springer.
  5. Zuckerman DM, Brown P, Nissen SE. Medical device recalls and the FDA approval process. Arch Intern Med. 2011;171(11):1006–11. · DOI · Paper page
  6. Connor MJ, et al. Medical device recalls in radiation oncology: analysis of US Food and Drug Administration data, 2002–2015. Int J Radiation Oncology* Biology* Phys. 2017;98(2):438–46. · doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2017.02.006
  7. Wong S, et al. Recalls of foods and cosmetics due to microbial contamination reported to the US Food and Drug Administration. J Food Prot. 2000;63(8):1113–6. · DOI
  8. Bhalodiya BL, et al. A study on Pharmaceutical Drug Recall. Asian J Pharm Res. 2023;13(2):99–104. · doi:10.52711/2231-5691.2023.00020
  9. Wang B, Gagne JJ, Choudhry NK. The epidemiology of drug recalls in the United States. Arch Intern Med. 2012;172(14):1110–1. · DOI
  10. Nagaich U, Sadhna D. Drug recall: an incubus for pharmaceutical companies and most serious drug recall of history. Int J Pharm Invest. 2015;5(1):13. · DOI
  11. Shader RI, Greenblatt DJ. Recent Recall of a Generic Form of Extended-Release Paliperidone. 2017, LWW. pp. 493–494. · doi:10.1097/jcp.0000000000000765
  12. Algabbani AM, et al. The inadvertent consequences of drug recalls: a case study of a recall of pantoprazole generics from the markets. Saudi Pharm J. 2023;31(7):1181–5. · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Nizam VP, M., Yerram, S., Patnam, J. D., CS, A., Aglave, G., Joga, R., Raghuvanshi, R. S., & Srivastava, S.
Venue
Journal of Pharmaceutical Innovation
Published
2024-09-28
Volume
19
Issue
5
ISSN
  • 1872-5120
  • 1939-8042
Cited by
9
Language
en
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ensuring Product Safety: A Comprehensive Retrospective Study of USFDA Drug Recalls (2019–2023). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s12247-024-09869-z
The paper
Nizam VP, M., Yerram, S., Patnam, J. D., CS, A., Aglave, G., Joga, R., Raghuvanshi, R. S., & Srivastava, S. (2024). Ensuring Product Safety: A Comprehensive Retrospective Study of USFDA Drug Recalls (2019–2023). Journal of Pharmaceutical Innovation. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12247-024-09869-z

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.