The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A carbon-based 3D current collector with surface protection for Li metal anode
Abstract
Lithium metal is considered the ideal anode material for Li-ion-based batteries because it exhibits the highest specific capacity and lowest redox potential for this type of cells. However, growth of Li dendrites, unstable solid electrolyte interphases, low Coulombic efficiencies, and safety hazards have significantly hindered the practical application of metallic Li anodes. Herein, we propose a three-dimensional (3D) carbon nanotube sponge (CNTS) as a Li deposition host. The high specific surface area of the CNTS enables homogenous charge distribution for Li nucleation and minimizes the effective current density to overcome dendrite growth. An additional conformal Al 2 O 3 layer on the CNTS coated by atomic layer deposition (ALD) robustly protects the Li metal electrode/electrolyte interface due to the good chemical stability and high mechanical strength of the layer. The Li@ALD-CNTS electrode exhibits stable voltage profiles with a small overpotential ranging from 16 to 30 mV over 100 h of cycling at 1.0 mA·cm–2. Moreover, the electrodes display a dendrite-free morphology after cycling and a Coulombic efficiency of 92.4% over 80 cycles at 1.0 mA·cm –2 in an organic carbonate electrolyte, thus demonstrating electrochemical stability superior to that of planar current collectors. Our results provide an important strategy for the rational design of current collectors to obtain stable Li metal anodes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Li-O2 and Li-S batteries with high energy storage
Bruce, P. G., Freunberger, S. A., Hardwick, L. J., & Tarascon, J.-M. (2012) · Nature Materials · doi:10.1038/nmat3191 · Cited by 9,479
Cited by
Perspectives for restraining harsh lithium dendrite growth: Towards robust lithium metal anodes
Wu, F., Yuan, Y.-X., Cheng, X.-B., Bai, Y., Li, Y., Wu, C., & Zhang, Q. (2018) · Energy Storage Materials · doi:10.1016/j.ensm.2018.03.024 · Cited by 319
Self-citationStitching h-BN by atomic layer deposition of LiF as a stable interface for lithium metal anode
Xie, J., Liao, L., Gong, Y., Li, Y., Shi, F., Pei, A., Sun, J., Zhang, R., Kong, B., Subbaraman, R., et al. (2017) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.aao3170 · Cited by 308
Self-citationStrategies towards enabling lithium metal in batteries: interphases and electrodes
Horstmann, B., Shi, J., Amine, R., Werres, M., He, X., Jia, H., Hausen, F., Cekic-Laskovic, I., Wiemers-Meyer, S., Lopez, J., et al. (2021) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/d1ee00767j · Cited by 298
Strategies to anode protection in lithium metal battery: A review
Li, J., Kong, Z., Liu, X., Zheng, B., Fan, Q. H., Garratt, E., Schuelke, T., Wang, K., Xu, H., & Jin, H. (2021) · InfoMat · doi:10.1002/inf2.12189 · Cited by 267
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhang, Y., Liu, B., Hitz, E., Luo, W., Yao, Y., Li, Y., Dai, J., Chen, C., Wang, Y., Yang, C., Li, H., & Hu, L.
- Venue
- Nano Research
- Publisher
- Tsinghua University Press
- Published
- 2017-03-01
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1356-1365
- ISSN
- 1998-0000 (ISSN-L)
- 1998-0124
- OpenAlex
- W2592478677
- Cited by
- 252
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 10.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A carbon-based 3D current collector with surface protection for Li metal anode. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s12274-017-1461-2
- The paper
- Zhang, Y., Liu, B., Hitz, E., Luo, W., Yao, Y., Li, Y., Dai, J., Chen, C., Wang, Y., Yang, C., Li, H., & Hu, L. (2017). A carbon-based 3D current collector with surface protection for Li metal anode. Nano Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12274-017-1461-2
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.