The DOI matches its Crossref record; 85 of the 85 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Environmental governance under Bolsonaro: dismantling institutions, curtailing participation, delegitimising opposition
Open accessAbstract
Tensions concerning environmental governance have increased in Brazil since the far-right came to power in 2016. We offer insight into this process by analysing the first two years of Jair Bolsonaro's (2019-ongoing) environmental policies-namely, how Brazil's environmental protection arrangements are being dismantled. We find that the Bolsonaro administration centralises environmental governance in Brazil through complementary authoritarian and populist means. First in restricting participatory decision-making spaces such as the National Environmental Council (Conama) and the National Council of the Legal Amazon (CNAL), and, second, by attacking indigenous and traditional peoples, NGOs, scientists, and other environmental defenders. To illustrate the authoritarian dimension of Bolsonaro's environmental governance, we carry out a political-institutional analysis of contemporary Brazilian environmental politics and then exemplify the ways and extent to which attacks against environmental defenders is a constituent part of Bolsonaro's environmental populism. We hold that such attacks are not merely rhetorical but a political tactic to legitimise Bolsonaro's authoritarian environmental governance in the promotion of 'total extractivism' while maintaining a populist appeal.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“but similar dynamics shape Bolsonaro's Brazil, Fujimori's Peru, and contemporary Serbia, where bureaucratic continuity conceals deep politicization and patronage- driven governance (Bauer and Becker2020; Peters and Pierre 2022; Menezes and Barbosa 2021; Peci2021; Radeljić and Đorđević2020)”
From Authoritarian Drift, Variegated Paths: Mapping Administrative Transformation Strategies Under Illiberal Rule (2025) · cites this paper as Menezes and Barbosa 2021
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Polycentric systems for coping with collective action and global environmental change
Ostrom, E. (2010) · Global Environmental Change · doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.07.004 · Cited by 2,460
Sustainable development: mapping different approaches
Hopwood, B., Mellor, M., & O’Brien, G. (2005) · Sustainable Development · doi:10.1002/sd.244 · Cited by 2,318
The Oxford Handbook of the Radical Right
(2018) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190274559.001.0001 · Cited by 936
Right-wing populism and the climate change agenda: exploring the linkages
Lockwood, M. (2018) · Environmental Politics · doi:10.1080/09644016.2018.1458411 · Cited by 746
Populism in Place: The Economic Geography of the Globalization Backlash
Broz, J. L., Frieden, J., & Weymouth, S. J. (2019) · International Organization · doi:10.1017/s0020818320000314 · Cited by 413
Emancipatory rural politics: confronting authoritarian populism
Scoones, I., Edelman, M., Borras, S. M., Hall, R., Wolford, W., & White, B. (2021) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781003162353-1 · Cited by 406
Os sentidos do lulismo: reforma gradual e pacto conservador
Rocha, C. (2013) · Leviathan · doi:10.11606/issn.2237-4485.lev.2013.132328 · Cited by 350
The Transformation of the Workers' Party in Brazil, 1989–2009
Hunter, W. (2010) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511763304 · Cited by 343
A Savage Sorting of Winners and Losers: Contemporary Versions of Primitive Accumulation
Sassen, S. (2010) · Globalizations · doi:10.1080/14747731003593091 · Cited by 329
Research works printed but not linked: 17
- Acosta, Alberto. 2013. Extractivism and neoextractivism: two sides of the same curse. In Beyond development: alternative visions from latin America, ed. Imre Szűcs, 61–86. Quito, Amsterdam: Transnational Institute / Rosa Luxemburg Foundation.
- ASCEMA National. 2020. Chronology of an announced disaster: actions of the Bolsonaro government to dismantle environmental policies in Brazil. : Associação Nacional dos Servidores de Meio Ambiente.
- Bolsonaro, Jair. 2018. Plano de Governo: Brasil acima de tudo; Deus acima de todos. Brasília: TSE.
- Carneiro, Ricardo. 2002. Desenvolvimento em crise. São Paulo: Unesp/Unicamp.
- Fiori, José Luis. 2007. O Poder global e a nova geopolítica das nações. São Paulo: Boitempo.
- Gonçalves, Reinaldo. 2013. Desenvolvimento às avessas. Rio de Janeiro: LTC.
- Guajajara, Sônia. 2020. Governo Bolsonaro: o retrato da barbárie contra os povos indígenas e a vida. In Conflitos no campo: Brasil 2019, 182–189. Goiânia: CPT Nacional.
- Gudynas, Eduardo. 2015. Extractivismos en América del Sur y sus efectos derrame. Bulletin De La Société Suisse des Américanistes 76:13–23.
- Gudynas, Eduardo. 2020. Ecología política del fuego: ambiente y desarrollo en los incendios sudamericanos de 2019. In Informe Ambiental 2020: Lo ambiental debe ser política de Estado, Vol. 12, ed. Andrés Nápoli, Pía Marchegiani, 40–50. Buenos Aires: Fundación Ambiente y Recursos Naturales.
- INPE. 2020. Dados Abertos. : Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais.
- Policia Federal. 2020. Laudo de Perícia Criminal Federal: No 1242/2020. Brasília: INC/DITEC/PF.
- Sader, Emir. 2009. Postneoliberalism in Latin America. Development Dialogue 51:171–180.
- Santos, Boaventura Souza. 2002. Os processos de globalização. In Globalização e Ciências Sociais, ed. Boaventura Souza Santos, 25–102. São Paulo: Cortez.
- Singer, André. 2018. O lulismo em crise: um quebra-cabeça do período Dilma (2011–2016). São Paulo: Companhia das Letras.
- Vanaik, Achin. 2017. The rise of hindu authoritarianism: secular claims, communal realities. London: Verso.
- Ventura, Zuenir. 2003. Chico Mendes: crime e castigo. São Paulo: Companhia das Letras.
- Zhouri, Andréa. 2014. Mapeando desigualdades ambientais. Mineração e desregulação ambiental. In Formas de matar, de morrer e de resistir, ed. Andréa Zhouri, Norma Valencio, 111–141. Belo Horizonte: UFMG.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–103 of 103
Topçuoğlu, E. (2026) · Liberal Düşünce Dergisi · doi:10.36484/liberal.1866259
Corimanya-Yucra, E. M., & Moretto, E. M. (2026) · Land Use Policy · doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2026.108319
Defending ecology and evolution in an age of democratic backsliding and environmental crisis
Murray, D. L. (2026) · Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.3389/fevo.2026.1761637
Metadata
- Authors
- Menezes, R. G., & Barbosa, R.
- Affiliations
- Universidade de Brasília (BR)
- University of Calgary (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Barbosa, Ricardo
- Venue
- Zeitschrift für Vergleichende Politikwissenschaft
- Published
- 2021-06
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 229-247
- ISSN
- 1865-2646 (ISSN-L)
- 1865-2654
- PMC
- PMC8358914
- OpenAlex
- W3196233990
- Cited by
- 104
- References
- 85
- Citations by year
- 2026: 20 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 3
- FWCI
- 52.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Zeitschrift für Vergleichende Politikwissenschaft (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
- Fundação de Apoio à Pesquisa do Distrito Federal
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Politics and Society in Latin America
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Populism, Right-Wing Movements
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Extractivism and Socioeconomic Issues
- Keywords
- environmental governance, Bolsonaro government, authoritarianism, environmental defenders, indigenous peoples, participatory decision-making, far right, Brazil
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review