Cited by 11Infection Control in HealthcareSurgical site infection preventionBlood donation and transfusion practices

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 18 of the 19 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Impact of Donor Arm Cleaning with Different Aseptic Solutions for Prevention of Contamination in Blood Bags

Open access
Patel, Tanvi G., Shukla, Rinku V., Gupte, Snehalata C.·2013·Indian Journal of Hematology and Blood Transfusion

Abstract

Transfusion associated sepsis cases are encountered occasionally and bacterial transmission remains the major cause. The goal of our study was to compare the efficacy of disinfectants in phlebotomy site preparation. After selection of donor the antecubital fossa area of the arm was disinfected with different types of disinfectants namely sprit (70% isopropyl alcohol), povidone iodine (0.5% w/v available iodine in distilled water), savlon (1.5% v/v chlorhexidine gluconate solution and 3.0% cetrimide solution) and combination of sprit and povidone iodine. Swabs were collected from 20 donors using a sterile forceps, after cleaning with different antiseptic solutions. Swab was streaked on blood agar plate aseptically and the plate was incubated at 37°C for 24 h. Colonies were counted and a single colony was re-cultured by growing on nutrient and Mac-Conkey agar. The biochemical characteristics were determined by performing Gram staining, Motility, Catalase and Oxidase tests. The mean values of colonies were significantly higher with savlon compared to other three solutions. The difference was statistically significant by "t" test (t values 1.7-3.0; P < 0.05). Staphylococcus epidermidis, Staphylococcus sp., Streptococcus sp., Micrococcus sp., Bacillus megaterium and Bacillus cereus were the organisms identified. After completion of bleeding, samples from the bag were aseptically inoculated in aerobic and anaerobic culture bottles to be tested on BacT/Alert system. The bag containing donor's blood did not show any contamination when three cleanings were carried out using sprit, povidone iodine and spirit respectively.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s12288-011-0138-3

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 19 references

Cited by

See all 11

Metadata

Authors
Patel, T. G., Shukla, R. V., & Gupte, S. C.
Corresponding author
Gupte, Snehalata C.
Venue
Indian Journal of Hematology and Blood Transfusion
Published
2012-01-31
Volume
29
Issue
1
Pages
17-20
ISSN
  • 0971-4502 (ISSN-L)
  • 0974-0449
OpenAlex
W2050539385
Cited by
11
References
19
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Indian Journal of Hematology and Blood Transfusion (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Infection Control in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Surgical site infection prevention
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Blood donation and transfusion practices
Keywords
antiseptic solutions, transfusion-associated sepsis, bacterial transmission, isopropanol, povidone-iodine, chlorhexidine gluconate, cetrimide, Staphylococcus epidermidis, Bacillus cereus, Bacillus megaterium

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Impact of Donor Arm Cleaning with Different Aseptic Solutions for Prevention of Contamination in Blood Bags. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1007/s12288-011-0138-3
The paper
Patel, T. G., Shukla, R. V., & Gupte, S. C. (2013). Impact of Donor Arm Cleaning with Different Aseptic Solutions for Prevention of Contamination in Blood Bags. Indian Journal of Hematology and Blood Transfusion. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12288-011-0138-3