Valsartan/Amlodipine Compared to Nifedipine GITS in Patients with Hypertension Inadequately Controlled by Monotherapy
Abstract
Introduction Current hypertension guidelines recommend single-pill combinations because they not only improve convenience and compliance to therapy and thus blood pressure (BP) control, but also reduce health-care costs. This study compared the efficacy and safety of valsartan/amlodipine single-pill combination with nifedipine gastrointestinal therapeutic system (GITS) in Chinese patients with hypertension who were inadequately controlled with monotherapy. Methods In this multicenter, open-label, active-controlled, parallel-group study, 564 patients with hypertension not adequately controlled by prior monotherapy were randomized to receive valsartan/amlodipine 80/5 mg or nifedipine GITS 30 mg once daily for 12 weeks. Results In the intention-to-treat analysis (n = 540), valsartan/amlodipine (n = 272) showed a least-square mean reduction of -16.6 versus -10.8 mmHg by nifedipine GITS (n = 268; mean between-treatment difference: -5.8 mmHg; P < 0.0001) from baseline to week 12. The corresponding results for mean sitting diastolic BP were -8.6 and -4.6 mmHg, respectively (difference: -4.0 mmHg; P < 0.0001). The percentage of patients achieving the BP target (<140/90 or <130/80 mmHg in the absence or presence of diabetes mellitus, respectively) was significantly higher with valsartan/amlodipine (79.0%) versus nifedipine GITS (57.4%; P < 0.0001). The overall incidence rate of adverse events was lower with valsartan/amlodipine (19.2%) than with nifedipine GITS (29.4%; P = 0.004). Conclusion The valsartan/amlodipine 80/5 mg single-pill combination is well tolerated and more effective than nifedipine GITS 30 mg for BP control in Chinese patients with hypertension.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Exceptional early blood pressure control rates: The ACCOMPLISH trial
Jamerson, K., Bakris, G. L., Dahlöf, B., Pitt, B., Velazquez, E., Gupte, J., Lefkowitz, M., Hester, A., Shi, V., Kjeldsen, S. E., et al. (2007) · Blood Pressure · doi:10.1080/08037050701395571 · Cited by 125 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
- Authors
- for the EXAM Investigators, Wang, J.-G., Zeng, W.-F., He, Y.-S., Chen, L.-L., Wei, M., Li, Z.-P., Zhang, B.-W., & Li, Y.
- Affiliations
- Shanghai Jiao Tong University (CN)
- Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital (CN)
- Peking University First Hospital (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Wang, Ji-Guang
- Venue
- Advances in Therapy
- Published
- 2013-08
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 771-783
- ISSN
- 0741-238X (ISSN-L)
- 1865-8652
- OpenAlex
- W2074066553
- Cited by
- 17
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 1.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Advances in Therapy (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Sodium Intake and Health
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Hormonal Regulation and Hypertension
- Keywords
- hypertension, single-pill combination, blood pressure control, adverse events, Chinese patients, angiotensin receptor blockers, calcium channel blockers
- MeSH terms
- Amlodipine, Valsartan Drug Combination, Adult, Antihypertensive Agents, Delayed-Action Preparations, Drug Combinations, Female, Humans, Hypertension, Male, Middle Aged, Nifedipine, Tetrazoles, Treatment Outcome, Amlodipine, Asian People
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review