Cited by 2Diabetes Management and ResearchDiabetes Treatment and ManagementIntravenous Infusion Technology and Safety

Pharmacokinetics and Tolerability of Exenatide Delivered by 7-Day Continuous Subcutaneous Infusion in Healthy Volunteers

Vlasakakis, Georgios, Johnson, Susan L., Lin, Jiang, Yao, Xiaozhou, Gruenloh, Christopher J., Chism, John P., Nunez, Derek J.·2015·Advances in Therapy

Abstract

Introduction Small peptides are approved as treatments for type 2 diabetes mellitus and may have utility in metabolic diseases. These peptides often have short half-lives requiring delivery either as a sustained-release formulation or via a device. The opportunity to study their pharmacokinetics using simple solution formulations delivered by continuous subcutaneous infusion may facilitate the drug development process. Methods Here, we investigated the systemic exposure of an exemplar peptide (exenatide) when infused in healthy subjects using a Paradigm(®) Revel™ insulin infusion pump (Medtronic MiniMed). Four infusion regimens were tested: Constant 24-h infusion (16.5 μg/day), constant 7-day infusion (25.5 μg/day in Cohort 2), and two different 7-day escalation regimens (ranging from 7 to 58.5 μg/day in Cohort 1 and 25.5-58.5 μg/day in Cohort 3). Results While the overall exenatide pharmacokinetics were in line with those expected, the observed within-subject concentration variability was considerable. Conclusion Our work identifies sources of potential pharmacokinetic variability relating to the method of delivery and the drug's formulation that will be valuable to investigators contemplating the delivery of peptides via insulin infusion pumps. Funding GlaxoSmithKline. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01857895.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s12325-015-0222-4

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vlasakakis, G., Johnson, S. L., Lin, J., Yao, X., Gruenloh, C. J., Chism, J. P., & Nunez, D. J.
Affiliations
GlaxoSmithKline (United Kingdom) (GB)
Corresponding author
Vlasakakis, Georgios
Venue
Advances in Therapy
Published
2015-07
Volume
32
Issue
7
Pages
650-661
ISSN
  • 0741-238X (ISSN-L)
  • 1865-8652
OpenAlex
W795985692
Cited by
2
References
14
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2017: 1
FWCI
0.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Advances in Therapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
GlaxoSmithKline
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Intravenous Infusion Technology and Safety
Keywords
exenatide, pharmacokinetics, continuous subcutaneous infusion, insulin pump, peptide delivery, type 2 diabetes, systemic exposure, infusion regimen, drug tolerability
MeSH terms
Exenatide, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Female, Half-Life, Humans, Hypoglycemic Agents, Insulin Infusion Systems, Male, Peptides, Venoms, Infusions, Subcutaneous

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review