The DOI matches its Crossref record; 34 of the 34 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Impact of Social Robotics on L2 Learners’ Anxiety and Attitude in English Vocabulary Acquisition
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Students with reduced anxiety tend to develop their vocabulary more efficiently (Alemi et al., 2015).”
From Incidental vocabulary learning from digital games: the predictive role of game playing time, foreign language motivation, and anxiety (2026) · cites this paper as Alemi et al., 2015
Citations
Cites
Foreign Language Classroom Anxiety
HORWITZ, E. K., HORWITZ, M. B., & COPE, J. (1986) · The Modern Language Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1540-4781.1986.tb05256.x · Cited by 5,697 · cited 4×
“Thus Horwitz et al. [15] developed a scale foreign language classroom anxiety scale (FLCAS) made up of three major components affecting the anxiety levels of the students.”
BackgroundMethodInfluential(1985) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 3,037
Richardson, J. C., & Swan, K. P. (2003) · Online Learning · doi:10.24059/olj.v7i1.1864 · Cited by 1,725
Interactive Robots as Social Partners and Peer Tutors for Children: A Field Trial
Kanda, T., Hirano, T., Eaton, D., & Ishiguro, H. (2004) · Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1207/s15327051hci1901&2_4 · Cited by 1,013
Language Anxiety: Differentiating Writing and Speaking Components
Cheng, Y., Horwitz, E. K., & Schallert, D. L. (1999) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/0023-8333.00095 · Cited by 826
Effectiveness of vocabulary learning via mobile phone
Lü, M. (2008) · Journal of Computer Assisted Learning · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2729.2008.00289.x · Cited by 490
Anxiety and predictors of performance in the foreign language classroom
Matsuda, S., & Göbel, P. (2003) · System · doi:10.1016/j.system.2003.08.002 · Cited by 449
A two-month field trial in an elementary school for long-term human–robot interaction
Kanda, T., Sato, R., Saiwaki, N., & Ishiguro, H. (2007) · IEEE Transactions on Robotics · doi:10.1109/tro.2007.904904 · Cited by 397
Dynamic visualizations and learning: getting to the difficult questions
Hegarty, M. (2004) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2004.06.007 · Cited by 350
Xie, L., Antle, A. N., & Motamedi, N. (2008) · International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction (TEI) · doi:10.1145/1347390.1347433 · Cited by 295
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Meghdari A, Alemi M, Ghazisaedy M, Taheri AR, Karimian A, Zandvakili MZ (2013) Applying robots as teaching assistant in EFL classes at Iranian middle-schools. In: International conference on education and modern educational technologies, Venice, Italy. http://www.europement.com/library/2013/venice/bypaper/EMET/EMET-09.pdf . Accessed 14 Dec 2013
- Alemi M, Alipour M (2012) The effect of CALL on the vocabulary learning and reading comprehension of Iranian EFL learners. In: 10th International TELLSI Conference, Tehran, Iran
- Vetter EB (1983) TPR-Plus. In: Conference of the California association of teachers of English to speakers of other languages
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Social robots for education: a review.
Belpaeme, T., Kennedy, J., Ramachandran, A., Scassellati, B., & Tanaka, F. (2018) · Science Robotics · doi:10.1126/scirobotics.aat5954 · Cited by 1,558
Exploring students' perspectives on generative AI-assisted academic writing
Kim, J., Yu, S., Detrick, R., & Li, N. (2025) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-024-12878-7 · Cited by 438
Social Robots for Language Learning: A Review
van den Berghe, R., Verhagen, J., Oudgenoeg‐Paz, O., van der Ven, S. H. G., & Leseman, P. P. M. (2018) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/0034654318821286 · Cited by 418
Wang, X., Liu, Q., Pang, H., Tan, S. C., Lei, J., Wallace, M. P., & Li, L. (2022) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104703 · Cited by 303
Learning English with Augmented Reality: Do learning styles matter?
Hsu, T. (2016) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2016.12.007 · Cited by 338
Metadata
- Authors
- Alemi, M., Meghdari, A., & Ghazisaedy, M.
- Affiliations
- Islamic Azad University, Tehran (IR)
- Sharif University of Technology (IR)
- Corresponding author
- Meghdari, A.
- Venue
- International Journal of Social Robotics
- Published
- 2015-02-04
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 523-535
- ISSN
- 1875-4791 (ISSN-L)
- 1875-4805
- OpenAlex
- W2044099257
- Cited by
- 187
- References
- 34
- Citations by year
- 2026: 15 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 32 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 4
- FWCI
- 21.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- International Journal of Social Robotics (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Social Robot Interaction and HRI
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Second Language Acquisition and Learning
- Keywords
- social robotics, robot-assisted language learning, English as a foreign language, vocabulary acquisition, student anxiety, student attitudes, junior high school students, humanoid robots, educational technology, student motivation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
