Cited by 89Cardiovascular Issues in PregnancyCardiac Arrhythmias and TreatmentsCardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias

Electrical cardioversion during pregnancy: safe or not?

Open access
Tromp, C. H. N., Nanne, A. C. M., Pernet, P. J. M., Tukkie, R., Bolte, A. C.·2011·Netherlands Heart Journal

Abstract

Two pregnant patients with a sustained symptomatic maternal supraventricular arrhythmia are presented. Both patients were treated with direct-current cardioversion. Electrical cardioversion during pregnancy is a rarely applied but highly effective procedure in the treatment of maternal cardiac arrhythmias and is assumed safe for both mother and child. However, once foetal viability is reached, monitoring of the foetal heart rate is advised and facilities for immediate caesarean section should be available.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s12471-011-0077-5

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 35 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tromp, C. H. N., Nanne, A. C. M., Pernet, P. J. M., Tukkie, R., & Bolte, A. C.
Affiliations
Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
Corresponding author
Tromp, C. H. N.
Venue
Netherlands Heart Journal
Published
2011-01-27
Volume
19
Issue
3
Pages
134-136
ISSN
  • 1568-5888 (ISSN-L)
  • 1876-6250
OpenAlex
W2042225678
Cited by
89
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 3
FWCI
3.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • Netherlands Heart Journal (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Amsterdam UMC (VU Amsterdam) - Institutional Repository (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Digital Academic REpository of VU University Amsterdam (Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam) (submittedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Issues in Pregnancy
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
Keywords
electrical cardioversion, pregnancy, supraventricular arrhythmias, fetal heart rate monitoring, cesarean section, maternal safety

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review